Dear all
One of the things that's resulted from getting help with the license
process is that it's been noticed we don't have a lot of the legal
furniture, and thus protection and clarity, found frequently
elsewhere. We've been offered some fairly standard privacy and terms
of use
On 24/06/09 06:56, SteveC wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy_-_Discussion_Draft
The Mozilla project has a privacy policy which I would suggest is rather
friendlier, while still being lawyer-approved - at least, US lawyers.
I'm sure I could arrange for you to be able
Hi,
Gervase Markham wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use_-_Discussion_Draft
These seem very long indeed. What risks are we mitigating here? If they
are significant, why does every website in the world not have to have
one of these?
Yes, I'm also very tempted to
On Jun 24, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I could probably find something idiotic in every paragraph if I put my
mind to it but I'd rather do something else.
Some of the stuff is there simply by virtue of having any terms of use
at all, e.g. Assignment, Survival, or Claims.
Some of
2009/6/25 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Yeah, sure, and if I leave the house a brick might fall on my head and
I'd be dead.
I'm almost sure you wanted to write tile ;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/6/25 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
For example, if we build strong national chapters that, legally, are
separate from OSMF, these could easily between themselves set up all the
servers required to replace everything OSMF operates. With such a
healthy backup network, it would not
2009/6/25 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Hallo Frederik
oops, sorry, not for the list.
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
