Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is this clickthrough agreement compatible with OSM?

2010-08-26 Thread Gregory Arenius
Replying to myself here but... The city sent me a prompt reply to my email. They're big fans of our work and would like to help. I will probably be meeting with one of them in the coming week to discuss ways that we can collaborate and what data sets we would like access to. I wanted to ask

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is this clickthrough agreement compatible with OSM?

2010-08-25 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com wrote: I've been considering bringing in some of the data available at http://www.datasf.org .  Most of it is behind this clickthrough agreement: http://gispub02.sfgov.org/website/sfshare/index2.asp . I think it would be okay

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is this clickthrough agreement compatible with OSM?

2010-08-25 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
On 25/08/2010 13:29, Richard Weait wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Gregory Areniusgreg...@arenius.com wrote: http://gispub02.sfgov.org/website/sfshare/index2.asp That license looks pretty bad to me, from an including the data in OSM point of view. Nonetheless, it's not one of the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is this clickthrough agreement compatible with OSM?

2010-08-25 Thread Gregory Arenius
I must have missed that particular section somehow. I sent off an email to ask the city if we could get the data under a license we could use. We'll see what happens. As to how many OSMers are in the city its hard to say exactly. There are a few people working on the map pretty frequently and