sward wrote:
By having a closed development process, and publishing drafts
for review, OSMF have forced the process to involve rounds
of consultation.
It's not OSMF's licence. It is a third-party licence which OSM is
considering and on which OSMF has sponsored some work. To my knowledge
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:00:58AM -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
sward wrote:
By having a closed development process, and publishing drafts
for review, OSMF have forced the process to involve rounds
of consultation.
It's not OSMF's licence. It is a third-party licence which OSM is
sward wrote:
Communications with Jordan have apparently broken down.
Mikel's e-mail of 15th Jan, which post-dates the minutes you're quoting
from, said Jordan had been involved in a meeting with them the previous day,
and was currently in discussion with Wilson Semprini (/monty_python).
cheers
Simon Ward wrote:
I can’t help but think it would be more with the spirit of the project
to have open development of the licence, and that it would have been
beneficial if this had been an open development much earlier.
I've submitted comments on previous drafts of the licence via the blog
it
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:00, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
sward wrote:
By having a closed development process, and publishing drafts
for review, OSMF have forced the process to involve rounds
of consultation.
It's not OSMF's licence. It is a third-party licence which OSM is
considering and on
Please don't post personal emails when discussing trustworthiness. :-(
- Rob.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Peter Miller wrote:
If that is news to you as well Richard, then I am really confused.
I think that must have been a slip of the tongue on his part - I stepped
down from OSMF last summer and have had no official involvement with this
process since then.
Certainly when I was involved, the
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 04:07:38PM +, Rob Myers wrote:
By having a closed development process, and publishing drafts for
review,
I don't understand what an open development process for a legal document
would look like if not iterated drafting and comment.
There should be another
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:41:41AM -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
sward wrote:
Communications with Jordan have apparently broken down.
Mikel's e-mail of 15th Jan, which post-dates the minutes you're quoting
from, said Jordan had been involved in a meeting with them the previous day,
