Thanks for the feedback; I was away on a trip.
I think I'll wait to see what falls out of the current
license discussions before taking action on this.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
David,
Unless I missed out, I don't think you got any replies to your message below?
Let me stick my neck out and give a few hints on how to proceed. I am sure it
could be improved and others might like to comment on suitability. A
boilerplate has been suggested before and it would be good
Mike Collinson wrote:
A good general method is to flip things around, explain what you are
going to do with the data and ask them to contact you by, say, the
end of the month if the use does NOT meet their terms of use.
I think that is both politically and legally extremely unwise. You can't
At 06:06 PM 6/10/2008, Gervase Markham wrote:
Mike Collinson wrote:
A good general method is to flip things around, explain what you are
going to do with the data and ask them to contact you by, say, the
end of the month if the use does NOT meet their terms of use.
I think that is both
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:57:08PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I had the same thoughts when reading the text, but later it says that
the data can be used by anyone for any purpose as long as they comply
with attribution and sharing requirements, and with that proviso I think
it is ok (and
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
OSM might be considered non‐commercial
OSM *is not* a commercial enterprise. Not might be considered.
but what about companies who use
OSM? A licence to use data in a non‐commercial project is not
necessarily one that allows distribution to others (commercial or not).
