Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Simon Poole
Hi Paul Has anybody from the TR community tried to get permission from HGK (with a pointer that the data is freely available elsewhere and that removing it would add up to deleting and re-adding exactly the same data)? Having such permission would seem to be the best solution right now. 2nd

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Paul Norman
From: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 11:58 PM To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey Hi Paul Has anybody from the TR community tried to get permission from HGK (with a pointer that the data is

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Simon Poole
Am 29.04.2013 10:18, schrieb Paul Norman: From: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 11:58 PM To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey Hi Paul Has anybody from the TR community tried to get permission

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Simon Poole
Am 29.04.2013 11:14, schrieb Henning Scholland: Am 29.04.2013 10:42, schrieb Simon Poole: However in the current case I doubt that there is actually something useful for OSM left once the names are gone. If the information There is a village stays in OSM, it would be useful at all. If you

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Henning Scholland
Am 29.04.2013 11:27, schrieb Simon Poole: Am 29.04.2013 11:14, schrieb Henning Scholland: Am 29.04.2013 10:42, schrieb Simon Poole: However in the current case I doubt that there is actually something useful for OSM left once the names are gone. If the information There is a village stays in

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Paul Norman
Clarification on numbers: Assuming every node has been moved, we'd be talking about 26k place or mountain peak nodes I can definitely keep, about 3k I can restore from the existing redactions, and about 3k that I'm not sure about. Now, it's entirely possible a bunch of nodes haven't been

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Simon Poole
Paul I was basing my thoughts on this statement There a total of 31k objects, of which 28k are version 1. Version 1 would seem to imply not moved, or am I mixing something up? Simon / / Am 29.04.2013 11:40, schrieb Paul Norman: Clarification on numbers: Assuming every node has been

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: OSM place name data from Turkey

2013-04-29 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
Version 1 would seem to imply not moved, or am I mixing something up? I understood it so that the version 1s might well be already moved as part of the import process. This is at least what has been done in Haiti when importing place names and peaks and other objects from the US military topo