Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

It turns out that this clone issue was discussed several years ago and I had completely forgotten about it, maybe because I haven't used *@auto-xxx* nodes or *@presistence* nodes. See https://groups.google.com/g/leo-editor/c/oKGhRhUVTXA/m/xqUHMJzWAQAJ (thank you LewisNeal). But perhaps this

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

This is an interesting account of someone doing real programming - refactoring and simplifying version 1 - with the help of not one but two LLM bots. He wanted to compare how the two differed and how useful each would be - When the rubber duck talks back

Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

The GitHub issue is 3355 . On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote: > The loss of clones is specific to *@auto-md* trees (although I have not > tested other *@auto-xx* trees): > > In an outline with both *@clean*

Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

The loss of clones is specific to *@auto-md* trees (although I have not tested other *@auto-xx* trees): In an outline with both *@clean* and an *@auto-md* trees, when the outline is closed and re-opened, the clone nodes of the *@clean* tree remained but the clone nodes of the *@auto-md* tree

Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

I see where the problem is - or at least *a* problem - is, and it's serious. The problem I see is that when an outline with clones is re-opened, the clones are no longer clones. This did not happen when I created some clones in my Workbook, so there are some conditions yet to be determined.

Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

@Edward recently re-worked some of the importers. If you can use the current version of the devel branch (in GitHub) it would be worth trying. Can you share a tree that suffers from the problem? Or a minimal version that does? On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 5:12:30 AM UTC-4 p.os...@datec.at

Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

Sorry, it's Leo 6.6.4 on Arch Linux. On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 8:17:44 PM UTC+2 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote: > I tried out what you wrote and didn't get an error with an *@auto-md* > file. It is only a tiny, simple file so maybe it's not enough of a test. > Here is what I did: > > 1. Created

Re: @auto-ms does not get along with Leo's clones

@clean (and @file likely so) is not an option, because then the tree of nodes is note converted into markdown sections with the respective headings and their level. On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 7:58:13 PM UTC+2 tbp1...@gmail.com wrote: > Maybe @clean or even @file would work for you (not that