On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does
On 04/07/2014 08:03 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 09:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was
baho utot wrote:
On 04/07/2014 08:03 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Do you want to submit a patch?
Attached is the patch
LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
I'll see what I can do.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
I'll see what I can do.
I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
remove an executable is a bad idea in a system that might not always
have package
William Immendorf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
I'll see what I can do.
I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
remove an executable is a bad idea in a system that
On 04/07/2014 06:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
William Immendorf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL. That's html. The book is in xml docbook.
I'll see what I can do.
I've looked at the patch briefly. I'm pretty sure that using rm to
remove an
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
desired because util-linux ships a better nologin binary.
Coreutils will
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
desired because
baho utot wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:33 PM, William Harrington wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 7:20 PM, baho utot wrote:
the configure should be:
./configure --disable-nologin
as nologin was previously installed by shadow
Does util-linux nologin binary overwrite shadow's? If so, that is
10 matches
Mail list logo
