Seems like the good mr. Bubbles is at least partially putting his money
where his mouth is.
http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/02/01/kim-dotcom-puts-up-13500-bounty-for-first-person-to-break-megas-security-system/
Have a go, everyone!
Best
/P
On 23 January, 2013 - Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb
Mega needs an optional Chrome and Firefox plugin -- what Crypto.cat did,
but it could be optional.
They also need a desktop client like Dropbox so I can encrypt my files
automatically prior to uploading.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jerzy Łogiewa jerz...@interia.eu wrote:
More danger with
Randolph D.:
*www.cloudfogger.com*
or: http://retroshare.sf.net
2013/1/27 Brad Beckett bradbeck...@gmail.com
Mega needs
They also need a desktop client like Dropbox so I can encrypt my files
automatically prior to uploading.
I believe Cyphertite will encrypt your files prior to
Yes exactly what I was thinking, but MegaUpload needs to come up with Mac,
PC, and Linuxdesktop clients -- stat.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:20 AM, scarp sc...@tormail.org wrote:
Randolph D.:
*www.cloudfogger.com*
or: http://retroshare.sf.net
2013/1/27 Brad Beckett bradbeck...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
I'm not clear on most of the Retroshare design. Is there a threat model?
I share this lack of clarity. One of the things that I perceive as
a significant threat to software like this is full compromise of
a trusted party's system
On 01/23/2013 03:41 AM, Alex Comninos wrote:
Cracking tool milks weakness to reveal some Mega passwords
Dotcom's Mega aids crackers by sending password hashes in plain-text
e-mail. Really!
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/01/cracking-tool-milks-weakness-to-reveal-some-mega-passwords/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:40:13AM -0500, bbrewer wrote:
Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote:
Mega seems also to have an exploitable bug for email spaming.
A lot of bloggers report this.
All the money in the world, and still, so many listed problems on this new
service.
Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
You don't seem to know Kim dotcom Schmitz well.
I remember seeing him on the gum ball (3000) rallies (in video, not lucky
enough to partake) , I believe before he was 'dotcom'' and realizing how
arrogant he is/was/etc.
I just think it'd be a way better
On 01/23/2013 01:40 PM, bbrewer wrote:
Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote:
Mega seems also to have an exploitable bug for email spaming.
A lot of bloggers report this.
All the money in the world, and still, so many listed problems on this new
service. Malicious intent, or just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Jan 2013, at 12:45, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:40:13AM -0500, bbrewer wrote:
All the money in the world, and still, so many listed problems on this new
service. Malicious intent, or just complete rush to give the
It would be nice if it actually worked. I cannot successfully upload nor
can anybody I know. It appears almost no better then OwnCloud.
Big disappointment as of now, but I'm going to wait and see what is later
developed.
Brad Beckett
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Sam de Silva
From what I've seen, it uses insecure means of encryption -- using
Math.random and mouse input to encrypt documents.
~Griffin
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:02 AM, SAM ANDERSON blackeduca...@mac.com wrote:
From what I have read, Mega is still being built. It's supposed to be
ready for the public a
Mega is using server-side Javascript for crypto, so you're trusting them
just like you'd trust Dropbox.
Other people have reported issues with their implementation, including
using weak randomness. I skimmed through their implementation and found
some portions that indicate they don't know what
Hasn't Retroshare also been under criticism for a lack of audit?
NK
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Randolph D. rdohm...@gmail.com wrote:
the secure alternative is htp://retroshare.sf.net
without payment, without google chrome sponsoring, without central
servers. a full alternative.
micah anderson:
Nadim Kobeissi na...@nadim.cc writes:
Hasn't Retroshare also been under criticism for a lack of audit?
I've always wondered why something like Mega gets a lot of attention and
people audit it pretty much immediately, but something like Retroshare,
which has been around for
On 01/21/2013 08:42 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
the secure alternative is htp://retroshare.sf.net
http://retroshare.sf.net
without payment, without google chrome sponsoring, without central
servers. a full alternative.
2013/1/21 Sam de Silva s...@media.com.au mailto:s...@media.com.au
Hi
16 matches
Mail list logo
