Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Christopher Soghoian
An entire article's worth of lip service? “I’m agnostic about this,” he says, “I don’t really care if Silent Circle captures this market, just as long as somebody does.” I spent the entire interview with the Verge writer complaining about the crappy security delivered by the wireless carriers,

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 micah anderson: I can't wait for the day when Google accidentally pushes an update out that actually bricks their devices, because when that happens, there is no way to simply reinstall the OS from scratch. -- Unsubscribe, change to digest,

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/07/2013 04:42 AM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: Actual headline. http://www.extremetech.com/mobile/147714-cryptography-super-group-creates-unbreakable-encryption-designed-for-mass-market NK Notionally there is no unbreakable encryption. Practically there is a unbreakable encryption (AES,

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Jens Christian Hillerup
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: Notionally there is no unbreakable encryption. Practically there is a unbreakable encryption (AES, SHA-3); our standarts are more than adequate. The risk with encryptions is more the possibility of a hardware hack.

Re: [liberationtech] EU NIS cybersecurity directive

2013-02-07 Thread André Rebentisch
Am 07.02.2013 00:30, schrieb André Rebentisch: Hi, Tomorrow, Thursday, a proposal for an EU Cyber Directive is supposed to get released. To be known as a proposed NIS (network and information security) Directive. Here is the fish:

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/07/2013 11:58 AM, Jens Christian Hillerup wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: Notionally there is no unbreakable encryption. Practically there is a unbreakable encryption (AES, SHA-3); our standarts are more than adequate. The risk with

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
Ali-Reza Anghaie a...@packetknife.com wrote: A VZW employee was nice enough to reach out off list - wanted to remain anonymous - says that the international SIMs they send for you to put in overseas Nexus devices won't tether. Ever. No matter what I'm told otherwise. Anyhow.. enough of

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
Small follow-up: Maybe it's true I look like my goal here is just to foam at the mouth at Silent Circle. Maybe it looks like I'm just here to annoy Chris, and I'm truly sorry. These are not my goals, even if my method seems forced. I've tried writing multiple blog posts about Silent Circle,

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Julien Rabier
Hello all, I'm no sec expert but to me, it's so obvious that Nadim is right on this. Perhaps the form is not perfect, but if he's the only one fighting for our own sanity here, as he says, that's no surprise. We should all be asking Silent Circle to commit to their statement and show us the

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Nadim Kobeissi na...@nadim.cc wrote: I've tried writing multiple blog posts about Silent Circle, contacting Silent Circle, asking journalists to *please* mention the importance of free, open source in cryptography, and so on. All of this has failed. It has

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Nadim Kobeissi: Small follow-up: Maybe it's true I look like my goal here is just to foam at the mouth at Silent Circle. Maybe it looks like I'm just here to annoy Chris, and I'm truly sorry. These are not my goals, even if my method seems

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Brian Conley: Micah, Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications indefinitely? Stop supporting the use of non-free software? We're all part of the

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
T N: The word Linux doesn't refer to anything, other than maybe the kernel. Chrome OS is linux. But it's a massively stripped down distribution that has a radical design, including the fact that it will ONLY run if all of the cryptographic checks are verified from the root of trust. That

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: Most of arguments I've heard here boil down to privileged wealthy people complaining that learning and mutual aid or solidarity is simply too hard. The worst is when people who train people in risky situations make

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jens Christian Hillerup: Hear-hear. They don't need to open-source their software to convince me, as long as they are open about their protocol at least. And what if there's a second set of decryption master keys? You're willing to trust them

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: This is hilarious. I would *never* use a laptop that lacks a way to protect all your traffic (eg: VPN/Tor/SSH tunnel/etc) in a place with serious surveillance as an at risk person. Not only because the remote

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Douglas Lucas
Can Silent Circle promoters explain why Zimmerman is excused from Kerckhoffs's principle? Is it because something unverifiable is allegedly better than nothing? Even if we had divine knowledge to tell us Silent Circle is secure, isn't it an overriding problem to encourage lock-in of closed source

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Douglas Lucas: Is it because something unverifiable is allegedly better than nothing? Even if we had divine knowledge to tell us Silent Circle is secure, isn't it an overriding problem to encourage lock-in of closed source being acceptable for

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.netwrote: A persistent backdoor on your Chromebook is not actually impossible. As Nate (?) pointed out, hardware backdoors wouldn't be all that difficult to implement, especially for someone who travels a lot. A ten minute delay

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Douglas Lucas d...@riseup.net wrote: Can Silent Circle promoters explain why Zimmerman is excused from Kerckhoffs's principle? Is it because something unverifiable is allegedly better than nothing? Even if we had divine knowledge to tell us Silent Circle is

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
Jake, you absolutely cannot equivocate your situation with most at-risk people for several reasons. Er, correction, I meant that you cannot treat the situations equally. And by jettison software, I meant jettison Hardware. Sorry, I can't brain today, I have the dumb. best, Griffin --

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Christopher Soghoian
Chris, You have repeatedly stood up asking VoIP software to be more transparent about their encryption. You have repeatedly stood up when the media overblew coverage into hype. I've never asked Skype to release the source code to their products, nor have I berated Apple, Facebook or

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 scarp: Douglas Lucas: Is it because something unverifiable is allegedly better than nothing? Even if we had divine knowledge to tell us Silent Circle is secure, isn't it an overriding problem to encourage lock-in of closed source being

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Christopher Soghoian ch...@soghoian.net wrote: My area of research is the intersection of law, policy and technology. As such, I am most interested in companies' surveillance policies, their commitment to transparency, and their stated willingness to tell the

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Christopher Soghoian ch...@soghoian.netwrote: What I resent though, is Nadim's repeated, malicious attempts to drag my name through the mud, simply because I will not join his witch hunt against Silent Circle. Since he cannot find a single example of me saying

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Rich Kulawiec
Alchemy is to chemistry, astrology is to astronomy, as closed-source is to open source. Closed-source is intellectual fraud. It is the equivalent of an academic paper which has a synopsis and conclusions -- but nothing else. No honest reviewer would ever approve such tripe for publication in a

[liberationtech] CfP: Special issue on ICT and Development in Africa

2013-02-07 Thread Yosem Companys
*Call for papers: Special issue on ICT and Development in Africa* (Information Technology for Development) *Deadline:* March 1, 2013 *More:* Submission

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
Inline below.. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, scarp sc...@tormail.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jens Christian Hillerup: Hear-hear. They don't need to open-source their software to convince me, as long as they are open about their protocol at least.

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
Douglas, I'm not sure many people are disagreeing with the end-goals and even Zimmerman acknolwedges the window for verifiable source proof is closing fast (longer than many would have liked as-is). My comments to Nadim are coming from a tact perspective - if the goal is to gain wider adoption

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Nadim Kobeissi: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: This is hilarious. I would *never* use a laptop that lacks a way to protect all your traffic (eg: VPN/Tor/SSH tunnel/etc) in a place with serious surveillance as an at risk person. Not only because

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Griffin Boyce: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.netwrote: A persistent backdoor on your Chromebook is not actually impossible. As Nate (?) pointed out, hardware backdoors wouldn't be all that difficult to implement, especially for someone who travels a

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Yosem Companys
Just as a reminder, please let's all try to refrain from engaging in any personal attacks. We're all build and use liberationtech to make a difference in various ways, and we're bound to have disagreements. But let's not forget that we're all working toward the same broad goal of making people's

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
And even the proponents already have. Here, elsewhere, .. Nobody is happy at technically ignorant gee-whiz journalism. The discussion has been, a few times now, how we tend to speak out about it. And what busses people on the same side seem willing to throw each other under. Gods know why. -Ali

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Jens Christian Hillerup
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:34 PM, scarp sc...@tormail.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jens Christian Hillerup: Hear-hear. They don't need to open-source their software to convince me, as long as they are open about their protocol at least. And what if there's a

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
The latest unbreakable even by a supercomputer article includes artistic, black and white photographs of Phil Zimmermann and John Callas:

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
“I tell them go ahead and use Skype — I don’t even want to talk to you. This is for serious people interested in serious cryptography,” Zimmermann said. “We are not Facebook. We are the opposite of Facebook.”

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
I do have to wonder why they've twice mentioned embargoes countries they couldn't sell to legally anyway. Is there something I'm missing about ~selling~ dissidents solutions in Iran and NK? US Government have an exception for that? -Ali On Feb 7, 2013 4:38 PM, Nadim Kobeissi na...@nadim.cc wrote:

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread T N
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: It runs software that is in Debian, the GNU/Linux operating system. I know, I've written some of it (eg: tlsdate). They do a good job of locking things down but it is basically just another distribution of Linux. I

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread T N
The other things I meant to add: Most Linux distro's are not running with their executable code on a readonly filesystem, and it takes some effort to convert to a RO configuration. Also you can not login to a stock Chrome OS device as root. That account has logins disabled. You have to flip to

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Collin Anderson
Is there something I'm missing about ~selling~ dissidents solutions in Iran and NK? US Government have an exception for that? -Ali There is a Favorable Licensing Policy for Iran on Internet Freedom that specifically mentions Fee-Based Internet Communication Services, although since published in

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Katrin Verclas
UAE - Etisalat, nexus 4 - tethering was easy once the data plan was procured. That, however, ain't simple - took time and some significant documentation. Only thing they did not ask for was my first-born son. On Feb 6, 2013, at 15:31, Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv wrote: What

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
T N: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: It runs software that is in Debian, the GNU/Linux operating system. I know, I've written some of it (eg: tlsdate). They do a good job of locking things down but it is basically just another distribution of Linux.

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
T N: The other things I meant to add: Most Linux distro's are not running with their executable code on a readonly filesystem, and it takes some effort to convert to a RO configuration. If someone has root on the machine or physical access, I guess that it won't matter as much as we'd

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Christopher Soghoian
See Inline On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote: Silent Circle may be an excellent privacy app. It might not have any significant security problems. It might even do a good job of mitigating important platform-based attacks and supporting important new

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
Christopher Soghoian ch...@soghoian.net wrote: Twitter's official client and server code are not open source Much of Google's code, including all of the Gmail backend code is not open source That's a bit of a false equivalency, don't you think? Silent Circle's whole premise is

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread micah anderson
Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv writes: Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications indefinitely? I never suggested that all family members

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Robert Guerra
Chris, Nicely put. Agree with your comments 100% Robert -- On 2013-02-07, at 8:14 PM, Christopher Soghoian wrote: See Inline On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote: Silent Circle may be an excellent privacy app. It might not have any significant

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ali-Reza Anghaie: Inline below.. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, scarp sc...@tormail.org wrote: The fact you can't buy into this service anonymously, so at least payment credentials will be available. Even if Phil says he won't be bad

Re: [liberationtech] Cryptography super-group creates unbreakable encryption

2013-02-07 Thread Brian Conley
+1. I wish I could say otherwise, but now after a few years working as a journalism trainer and in the journalism field I've been led to recognize that, whether I like it or not, and whether it is ethical or not: 1. headlines are used to grab readers and generate buzz. I'd not read the article

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Brian Conley
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: Brian Conley: Micah, Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Brian Conley
snip My point was for something off the shelf, I know of nothing better and as far as it goes... I'd say it's a step up for a lot people who should be using more secure IT technologies and methods than they are (such as some journalists), and they can take that step with minimal