https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102946
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|102946 |
--- Comment #25
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #24 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #22)
> (In reply to Telesto from comment #21)
>
> Given what you've said, why did you mark this WONTFIX?
Unintentionally. The status was WONTFIX at the point
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #23 from jan d ---
The usecase for turning specific pages that I can think of are usually
specifically the cases where this basic assumption does not apply, i.e.
specific inset regions with e.g. a large diagram or image.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Allow direct formatting of |Allow direct formatting for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #16 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #13)
> We rather should drop all DF than adding more.
>
> => NAB/WF
Now, wait a minute, Heiko. If I opened a new bug today, asking to remove the
ability to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #11)
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> > While I fully agree with Mike's comments
> Then please read my last comment and I'm sure you'll change
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #9)
> Apart from your arguments, "making use of styles easy/promoting the use of
> styles" is a good principle in our work.
Unfortunately - it isn't; and this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> While I fully agree with Mike's comments
Then please read my last comment and I'm sure you'll change your mind.
> it might be worth to think about
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4)
> ... it is not impossible... but what would be the upside of this[?]
The opposite of the problems with which I described the current situation:
*
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #9 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6)
> I disagree that a "consistency" argument is applicable / fair in this
> context.
Apart from your arguments, "making use of styles easy/promoting the use of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
While I fully agree with Mike's comments it might be worth to think about from
another angle (actually as bugs should be reported). Something like: "I insert
a graphic on page 5 and want to make this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski ---
And let me also provide a "philosophical" view on this.
The proposal argues that since we allow DF for other entities, we should do the
same for pages. But this is like this:
1. There is a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
Additionally, the page styles are *actually* not the problem that users
struggle with. The largest user problem with page management in Writer is the
concept that page sequences are *properties of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> But what is your opinion, Mike, on DF of page _sequences_?
IIUC, the suggestion is to create a way to allow a *paragraph* (the entity that
defines the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2)
> No. It is legitimate as long as there is no "page as a primary object" in
> Writer (which is the case), unlike characters, paragraphs, and other primary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> If you were to say "such a modification is no longer, in fact, the original
> style; and should have its own style name" - that is a legitimate view,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108576, 102946
26 matches
Mail list logo
