This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project GNU Libtool.
The branch, master has been updated
via 830f33846e796d5094e9f055f48877a0e35ea9bd (commit)
from
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:44:41AM CEST:
With those addressed, and another successful distcheck, okay to push?
Sure.
Thanks,
Ralf
On 21 Sep 2010, at 12:07, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks again for the review.
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:05:46AM CEST:
Well, it does at least show that the script interacts correctly with
an error for make to help catch the case where someone
Hi!
I know it's late for the release, but I'd like to squeeze this one in
too, if at all possible. After all, it doesn't affect anything but MSVC.
With the patch, I get
sys_lib_search_path_spec=/c/PROGRA~1/MID05A~1/VC/ATLMFC/LIB
/c/PROGRA~1/MID05A~1/VC/LIB /c/PROGRA~1/MID05A~1/VC/PLATFO~1/lib
Den 2010-09-21 09:37 skrev Peter Rosin:
I know it's late for the release, but I'd like to squeeze this one in
too, if at all possible. After all, it doesn't affect anything but MSVC.
With the patch, I get
sys_lib_search_path_spec=/c/PROGRA~1/MID05A~1/VC/ATLMFC/LIB
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:37:16AM CEST:
I know it's late for the release, but I'd like to squeeze this one in
too, if at all possible. After all, it doesn't affect anything but MSVC.
I have questions:
What does Charles have to say to this?
What is $LIB? Is
Hello Rainer,
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:15:47AM CEST:
after this patch all tests from the old test suite are OK.
Great!
The new test suite still shows some problems but its getting much better:
Yeah. They pass fully with LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl. But the failures without
On 9/21/2010 1:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:37:16AM CEST:
I know it's late for the release, but I'd like to squeeze this one in
too, if at all possible. After all, it doesn't affect anything but MSVC.
I have questions:
What does
Den 2010-09-21 19:33 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:37:16AM CEST:
I know it's late for the release, but I'd like to squeeze this one in
too, if at all possible. After all, it doesn't affect anything but MSVC.
I have questions:
What does
Den 2010-09-21 20:08 skrev Charles Wilson:
On 9/21/2010 1:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:37:16AM CEST:
+ do
+IFS=$lt_save_ifs
+# Let DOS variable expansion print the short 8.3 style file name.
+lt_path=`cd $lt_path
Den 2010-09-21 20:08 skrev Charles Wilson:
On 9/21/2010 1:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:37:16AM CEST:
I know it's late for the release, but I'd like to squeeze this one in
too, if at all possible. After all, it doesn't affect anything
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-09-19 06:03 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
the release if it's not too much to ask for.
On 9/20/2010 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild
server...
Here's what I use, more or less, to create the logs:
( ../libtool/configure [OPTIONS] \
make \
make -k check
cat test-suite.log
Hi Chuck, Peter, Automakers,
On 22 Sep 2010, at 05:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
Peter Rosin wrote:
Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
the release if it's not too much to ask for. Thanks!
Errr...is
On 9/21/2010 9:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I don't recall having done so in a while but, according to bootstrap:
# It is okay for the bootstrap process to require unreleased autoconf
# or automake, as long as any released libtool will work with at least
# the newest stable versions of
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:21:55AM CEST:
On 22 Sep 2010, at 05:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
Peter Rosin wrote:
Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the
'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in
the release if it's not too
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:10:39AM CEST:
On 9/20/2010 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild
server...
Here's what I use, more or less, to create the logs:
See, that's what was missing. You had asked
On 22 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
You should not need to use git Automake for this, and please don't,
because it currently carries a small regression over 1.11.1.
Ah, okay. If it was taken care of by fetch already, then there was
no need for Peter to ping me :)
Thanks for the
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:42:53AM CEST:
On 22 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
You should not need to use git Automake for this, and please don't,
because it currently carries a small regression over 1.11.1.
Ah, okay. If it was taken care of by fetch
19 matches
Mail list logo
