Hi Charles, Bruno,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:34:56AM CEST:
Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
with identical results.
Thank you for patching and testing, and thanks to Bruno for
[ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/7314/focus=7498 ]
Thanks Charles for all your work on this. I installed this path into
Libtool HEAD, and pulled the changes over to gnulib. Here's what the
gnulib patch looks like.
Cheers,
Ralf
2007-04-25 Charles Wilson [EMAIL
Charles Wilson wrote:
I'll generate and
test an additional patch addressing Bruno's concerns.
Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
with identical results.
I did not bump the argz.m4 serial again (I'm not
Hi Charles,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:02:08AM CEST:
This is because the test is just too ugly for words, not to mention
brittle. Trying to tease out malloc issues outside of a dedicated malloc
testsuite is just plain silly.
I think the biggest problem with the
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Charles Wilson wrote:
This is because the test is just too ugly for words, not to mention
brittle. Trying to tease out malloc issues outside of a dedicated malloc
testsuite is just plain silly.
I think the biggest problem with the previous patch was that it was
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:08:41PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
It's a good choice of testing, and should be done again with the final
patch. Plus one test on Solaris with its /bin/sh. (Just noting this,
I can probably do these tests then.)
will do for linux
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:08:41PM CEST:
--- libltdl/m4/argz.m4 25 Mar 2006 11:05:02 - 1.3
+++ libltdl/m4/argz.m4 17 Mar 2007 06:09:50 -
[...]
+os_ver=$(uname -r | $SED -e 's,^\([[0123456789\.]]*\).*,\1,')
+
Hopefully the attached patch addresses all comments...Recapping:
The argz functions (specifically, argz_insert) supplied by cygwin are
buggy, in wierd use-dependent malloc-related ways. I've already
submitted a patch to newlib to fix that error which has been accepted
Charles Wilson wrote:
Under case (1), currently running the new-style testsuite. Will report
that later in a follow-up message. I expect the following:
14: Java convenience archives FAILED (convenience.at:273)
16: Link order of deplibs. FAILED (link-order2.at:129)
49: Run
Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
I'll whip up a patch and post it to the newlib list.
So, I posted the following:
http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00271.html
However, there's no telling how long it'll be before a new cygwin
kernel is released that
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
[snip long description of ugly runtime test]
See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-03/msg00030.html
After discussion with Bob F, I've reimplemented this fix without the actual
runtime test. Instead, if $host_os is cygwin, and
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
[snip long description of ugly runtime test]
See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-03/msg00030.html
After discussion with Bob F, I've reimplemented this fix without the
actual runtime test. Instead, if
On 16 March 2007 15:35, Charles Wilson wrote:
Well, it's failing all the time for me, but I'm not sure it's a
segfault. What does Hangup mean, when reported by the shell after
executing the app: Good question, I don't know.
It means SIGHUP.
I've (almost) tracked down the error: it is
Well, once I got the cygwin1.dbg stuff worked out, it was pretty easy to
track down: it is a bug in newlib's argz_insert:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Here's the code from newlib's argz_insert:
error_t
_DEFUN (argz_insert, (argz, argz_len, before, entry),
char **argz _AND
size_t
A (very small) progress report.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:02:01PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:42:50AM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The only thing that's then still worrying me is that on Cygwin, the
mdemo and mdemo_static programs
15 matches
Mail list logo
