2009/6/5 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuyshanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
can someone fix this? This currently hangs the website update.
mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/
msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po
2009/6/4 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
could try translating it into English, sooner or later.
I can help you with the translation, but I don't have a
2009/6/4 Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk:
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg00833.html
and follow-ups for the previous discussion on the topic. As far as I can
see, an implementation proposal is already available, just to commit.
I know Marek Klein did a lot of work
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 10:46 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony
W. Youngman:
I think that's a pretty usual setup (most people I know have a 32bit version
of Linux installed on their laptop even though their CPU is actually a
64bit).
Sometimes it makes sense to do what most people do,
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 11:31 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Valentin
Villenave:
2009/6/4 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have freshened the Spanish wikipedia LilyPond page a little bit.
This is the most time-consuming task you can face. After a rest I
could try translating it into
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
Windows machines, not from the actual machines themselves)
As I understand it, people with Windows can:
- run GUB
- get the sources with git
- compile the docs without
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
Did the original spanish page look at good examples of
other softwares? I don't read spanish, but it looks
real different from, say
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibelius_(software)
For example, the Sibelius
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond. Was
quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux installation which has all the required
2009/6/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
Just some thoughts...
I'll take this all into account, just give me some time.
With your permission, I'll write it into Spanish page first, then will
take it as
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl:
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 12:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
Just some thoughts...
I'll take this all into account, just give me some time.
With your permission, I'll write it into Spanish page
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:26:41PM +0200, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux installation which has all the required
software? Potential contributors would be able to run this
in the free VMware
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would recommend
this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional tools, and share the resulting virtual disk.
Bert
Graham
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would recommend
this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional tools, and share the
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then install
the additional
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
VirtualBox is Open Source and runs on Linux hosts, so I would
recommend this.
Creating an OS that can be used is a matter of creating a disk image.
One approach is to install ubuntu on the virtual machine, then
install the additional
BTW, having said all of this, I actually have an .iso of my own remix
of xubuntu that has all of the Lilypond build tools installed already.
It's kind of big, about 1.1GB, so it either has to go on a DVD or it
can be used as an .iso to install it in a virtual machine. I used a
tool called
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:44:27AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Can't all of the tools be installed from inside the virtual machine?
Yes, but since window users will already be faced with an
unfamiliar environment, we might as well set up the build system
for them.
**IF**
2009/6/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff
looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote
for checking all the snippets at once.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:17:01PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/6/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Yeah, but there are differences --
input/new/revised/rest-styles.ly doesn't contain tiny rests for
the mensural and neomensural. The version in LSR contains those
rests in the
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:44:27AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Can't all of the tools be installed from inside the virtual machine?
Yes, but since window users will already be faced with an
unfamiliar environment, we might as well set up the build
As we are looking for windows-experienced developers I really think that
the ubuntu way would be better, it is easier for us windowsers.
If you guys think it would be useful then I'll have a go at it. I
think I can remaster xubuntu with all the Lilypond build tools and get
it under 700MB to
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
under 700MB to fit on a CD. I would go with Debian but the tool
remastersys is specifically made for doing Ubuntu remixes and I'm not
sure it would work with straight Debian.
I was wrong about this. It's for Debian or Ubuntu. I can do Debian
if you think it's
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Paul Scottpsl...@ultrasw.com wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.comwrote:
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
When I
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.comwrote:
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run test.ly
with the latest stable binary on XP.
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run test.ly
with the latest stable binary on XP.
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
No error message and the PDF is fine now.
Thanks,
Paul
With 2.13.1 on Debian sid I get:
Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'...
`gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00
Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this?
thanks,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:53 PM, -Eluzeelu...@gmail.com wrote:
don't know if it is helpful, but in another score i get the same message with
a different number (line?)
(lilypond.exe:560): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to
I've done a fresh Ubuntu install on my 2nd partition so I can create this
lily-dev remix. Lilypond built successfully but the user documentation is
failing very early in the process. The CG built correctly, but none of the
stuff in user/ is building. Can anyone see what the problem is from this
Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
PRO:
+ one less branch/repo to track
+ easier to fix typos in the web pages
+ we can direct everybody to look at the CG (no more README in the
newweb/ branch)
+ allows better
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:11:35PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Reading music-glossary.tely...
Dissecting...
lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ../../scripts/lilypond-book.py, line 2108, in module
main ()
File
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Francisco Vila wrote:
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox.
Jon
I also have Windows inside VirtualBox.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
2009/6/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
That's a bit surprising because IIRC it has been told to separate it
completely into another place.
CON:
- adds 30 megs to
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this?
seems ok now!
i get an additional line (compared to former releases) in the log, which i
don't know if it is really useful (or maybe i don't understand fully what it
means):
GNU LilyPond 2.13.1
»__temp__.ly« wird verarbeitet
Is the Hungarian-language news item on the lilypond.org hopmepage
supposed to be there? It seems a little odd. Better if it were
translated to English, I think.
- Mark
A LilyPond weboldala magyaru - May 22, 2009
Elkészült a lilypond.org nagy részének magyar fordítása a LilyPond
honosítási
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.cawrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:11:35PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Reading music-glossary.tely...
Dissecting...
lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
In message 1244195981.25811.178.ca...@heerbeest, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
janneke-l...@xs4all.nl writes
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 10:46 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony
W. Youngman:
I think that's a pretty usual setup (most people I know have a 32bit version
of Linux installed on their laptop
Mark Polesky a écrit :
Is the Hungarian-language news item on the lilypond.org hopmepage
supposed to be there? It seems a little odd. Better if it were
translated to English, I think.
It is lilypond.org news tradition to announce translation events in the
translated language.
Maybe the
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
What I don't understand is how the permissions got jacked up in the
first place. I didn't do anything different this time than I usually
do. I've never had the permissions problem before. Maybe I put a
sudo in there inadvertently but I don't recall doing any sudos
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:12:59AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
Works great here. Thanks, Han-Wen.
-Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Graham
Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
PRO:
+ one less branch/repo to track
+ easier to fix typos in the web pages
+ we can direct
43 matches
Mail list logo
