On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:22:26PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
On 2012-06-20 05:51, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs
We have a list of non-free ones on the easier editing page
- e.g.
Noteworthy and my converter. However, it seems daft to me to remove
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:31:52PM +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 19/06/12 13:32, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs, nor require a non-free program to
build 13 I’d better check the licenses of the “Easier editing”
programs.
If you mean
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:39:18AM +0100, @tiredpixel wrote:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/References.html
Do you happen to know the GNU stance on 'recommending' software
licensed under a 'free' license (as defined by
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html), but not GNU?
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:40:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
The version from github.com/gperciva/git-cl.git ships without
the readline module. It is not required for Unixes as it is
included with Unix python, I believe.
Hmm. If it's as simple as including a bunch of extra .py files,
then
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 04:50:13PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Good luck.
My personal take on this is not to bother but disable use of the
readline module if unavailable. git cl does not ask for interactive
input often enough to make
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:26:18PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Description empty; aborting.
That just means that git-cl called what it considered an editor, and the
file for editing did not change, so git-cl aborted.
Another option would be to
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:21:31PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Il giorno dom, 01/07/2012 alle 23.29 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Could we get a clear note about which commit(s) were reverted and
are presumably in limbo?
The only patch that has been reverted so far
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 08:55:31PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
While TablEdit certainly looks impressive, I think we couldn't list
it on our website, as it is commercial software. Being a GNU
project, Lilypond is free as in beer and free as in speech, so we
really can only recommend the same
I'm not certain where we stand. Over the weekend, some patches
were pushed (by accident?) to master. One (or more?) of those
commits broke compiling, and were reverted. This fix was (or will
be?) pushed to staging, and people can (or can not?) now compile
git master without problems.
Could we
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:38:17PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
I performed these steps:
- creating a new file, naming it: page-headers-and-footers.ly
- pasting it into /input/regression
- Pressing the Ammend previous commit of the LilyDev-GUI to prepare
a new patch set
But I can't create a
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 03:32:50PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
One tiny thing.
The terminal returns as last message:
WARNING: could not change issue labels;
please email lilypond-devel with the issue number: 2626
Tracker issue done
Don't know what that means.
It means that your gmail
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 05:13:04PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
commit e6a5019c531bbc6663e0eebc645409148dbd8931
Author: John Mandereau - LilyPond development john.mander...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Jun 28 18:32:18 2012 +0200
Clean fonts and docs makefiles, trying to fix 'make -j' race
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 04:39:08PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
I suggest reverting recent build commits until git master can
compile ok,
NB: I'm making this suggestion as a normal developer, not as
project manager. If anybody really likes build scripts, sees the
problem, and can fix
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
in the call to lilypond-book. However, on Mike's machine,
build/Doc/snippets/out does not exist - so the makesnippets script
hasn't run (or hasn't completed properly). Do we have a missing
dependency or something?
makesnippets
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:41:49PM +0200, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
Once the most recent critical issues are squashed, are people up
for forking off a stable branch from 2.15? Administratively we'd
go into cherrypick mode like we did for 2.13 where we institute
a moratorium on pushing to the
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:32:53AM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
2012/6/28 d...@gnu.org:
A feature should be documented, or it will not be discoverable.
Well, they should be documented, but I propose to open a new issue to do so.
That sounds sensible. In the past we've said that new
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 03:56:03PM +, philehol...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6352053/diff/1/scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py#newcode79
scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py:79: default=out/bin,
...
it would be better if the default was the build/out directory, and if
convert-ly
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:05 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I can be there for those dates (24th to 28th). Perhaps not all as I am
moving apartments around the 28th but definitely for 2 or 3 days!
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:32:45PM +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
Of course I'm an absolutly newbie with this sort of work. It would be
nice if some could explain the next steps how to handle this patch (or
point me to the relevant CG-Chapter).
Section 1.3 Summary for experienced developers
or
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:39:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
It must be possible to check that the snippets extracted from the
tarball do not contain new snippets which contain dangerous commands
- for example #'(system rm -rf /). It would be possible to use
git/gitk to check for changes, but
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:46:09PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
i see that some very interesting things are happening.
I was inactive in the last days because i've contracted pneumonia, argh...
:-[
I hope to participate a bit in the discussions, but not as much as i'd like
to.
Get well
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 05:33:47AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
Graham Percival graham at percival-music.ca writes:
-any regression test which fails to compile or shows incorrect
output.
For any changed test then, it is probably worth reading the header, to
see if a subtle change
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:13:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Düsseldorf -- Dortmund -- 45 minutes hourly
Sounds good. Ok, I'm in as long as we have at least 3 developers
other than myself. So far there's David and Werner.
Mike, are you completely unavailable for that period? I recall
that
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:23:38PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I agree. I do not believe that saying it's too hard is a good
solution. I am more than willing to help people this way - I am
officially naming myself as New Contributor Czar and will
propose a patch in an hour that
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:41:51PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
Well, I do not count myself as developer,
You've got git push access. Feel like using that to add yourself
to Documentation/authors.itexi ? :)
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:05:40PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
As to not counting oneself as developer: I think it would make sense to
try workshops on programming topics, also with the aim of putting
people's wishes into code and giving them a hang of how to continue.
Yes, I'm hoping to have
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:07:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
The release policies demand 2 weeks without critical regression after a
development release. So far, we have rarely lasted a single week. The
policies are slated for rediscussion at the end of summer. By that
time, we'll not be
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:31:45PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: LSR updates and translations
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:01:20AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
201-06-27 GOP2-2 - Stable releases and roadmap (radical change)
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/
[empty document]
That's a pretty radical change, already ;-)
My parents were visiting
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:33:12AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
My proposal was just about a release addressing bit rot, namely just
making sure that the equivalent of the existing release 2.14.2 can be
compiled (with no regressions due to the recompilation) on current
systems that insist on
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:07:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
The release blocking issues could be fixed with minor reverts.
The usual release blockers are not revertible. Even if the current set
is get cleared out, history tells us that the time window of two weeks
after unstable release
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:30:12AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Assuming that this is a 10-minute job, put stuff in the
stable/2.14 git branch, just in case somebody grabs the source
from git tarball.
It's more than 10 minutes since I
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:59:14AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Le mardi 26 juin 2012 à 10:17 +0100, Phil Holmes a écrit :
2) Use a script to update $LILYPOND_GIT/Documentation/snippets. This
deletes all the old snippets except /new; reads all the snippets in the
tarball; adds the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:39:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
A
script is run (makesnippets.py?) which iterates over all the
directories in the extracted tarball and all the files in each
directory. It adds a line:
lsrtags = dir-1, dir-2
to each snippet, where dir-n is the directory name
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:21:43PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:39:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
lsrtags = dir-1, dir-2
*** HTML-formatted version:
lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_1.html
*** Summary
We’re not in terrible shape, but we’re not in good shape either.
*** Details
Survey sent:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-06/msg00192.html
There were 11 responses:
devA
devB
devC
devD
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:44:19PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:26:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Decent communication in electronic media
is one of the things I am spectacularly bad at. One thing that has
turned out to be effective at times is meeting people in
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:19:28PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 26/06/2012 09:24, Graham Percival disait :
Well, we had at least a week when the only release-critical bug
was the po-replace translation thing. It's a bit silly that we
couldn't have a release due to a 5-line texinfo
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:26:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
So the core data would be Dortmund Germany (about 10 miles from there)
and the proposal for a date would Friday August 17th to Tuesday August
21st, or one week later.
Any idea about the connectivity with nearby airports? Flying to
Not quite up to the ideal standard of GOP proposals, but there's a
lot of interest and this should be enough to see what way the wind
is blowing.
html-formatted version:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_3.html
*** Summary
Let’s drop the “any unintended change” thing, and go totally with
the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:58:13AM +, julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I just did a git am using his patch, but I'll amend the commit before
pushing. Do we need some license statement from Rodolfo?
No; lilypond is not FSF-copyright-assigned, so nothing is needed.
But thanks for checking!
-
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09:14AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I have posted all the responses to the survey.
Thanks so much for your help, Colin! I suggest that we spend a
few days to think about the responses and how we view the project,
then start discussing them on Monday.
- Graham
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:52:52PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
find . -name makelsr.py
./scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
./build/input/regression/musicxml/out-test/share/lilypond/current/scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
What happened to the formatting of this email? It looks like section
numbers are in wrong places and generally i'm getting lost while
reading. If you have it in a text file or something, could you send
it as an attachment?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:22:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Here's the first main policy point in GOP 2. For those
unfamiliar with GOP, here's a quick summary:
make a diff between releases 11.2let’s not bother; interested
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:59:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Hmm, I may have misunderstood your comment. If my response about
tags doesn't actually answer your concern, please elaborate.
A source tarball is not the same as a snapshot
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:18:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
So there was considerable and non-trivial difference between a vcs diff
and a release tarball diff. And the instructions reflect that.
I am not really all too sure how to apply this to our situation. At
present, I think most
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
My web space runs windows IIS. We have the .iso and occasional
tools (e.g. the regtest rater) running on this. Do you think this
is a problem?
Ouch, I'd forgotten about the regtest rater. That's C#, right?
or is it .NET ? I
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 08:13:52PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'm replying directly as I have nothing to say in secret.
...
I suspect those that have truly left will simply not bother
replying to Graham's request.
Thanks for the replies, Trevor and Jonathan.
Other developers: even if you
I've taken the unusual step of CCing lilypond developers directly
instead of merely sending this to -devel. If you consider
yourself an ex-lilypond developer, please read.
LOSS OF DEVELOPERS
We've lost a number of developers over the years due to policies
or personalities -- some publicly,
I've taken the unusual step of CCing lilypond developers directly
instead of merely sending this to -devel. If you consider
yourself an ex-lilypond developer, please read.
LOSS OF DEVELOPERS
We've lost a number of developers over the years due to policies
or personalities -- some publicly,
Who thinks they should have git push ability? I usually tell
people not to ask unless prompted, so now I'm prompting.
General rule of thumb is that you should have a bunch of patches
accepted, and generally be a trustworthy character. Or something
like that.
- Graham
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:01:16AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
1.) Replace lex-bison based parser with handwritten parser in gcalctool
...
I have the suspicion that the student will learn more than the
project.
The official response would probably be that's a feature, not a
bug.
Now
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:19:31PM +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
After update, it comes with g++ 4.7.0-5 and lilypon 2.15.39.
Please find attached the output which looks good to me.
Any idea why it does not come with a stable release (i.e. 2.14)?
Because the fedora mainter(s) for lilypond think
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:55:30PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I've been fairly clear: every release says either
It is strongly recommended that normal users do not use this
release, and instead use
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.40/Documentation/fr/texidocs/broken-crescendo-hairpin.ly
rm -rf /tmp/tmpEc298t
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test-lily/dist-check.py, line 137, in module
main ()
File test-lily/dist-check.py, line 132, in main
check_files (tarball,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/6/5 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
It looks like an error in the French translation's file name - it's there as
broken-crescendo-hairpin.ly whereas in es/texidocs/ (for example) it's
broken-crescendo-hairpin.texidoc
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:47:28PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I'm aware that libmpfr is a listed requirement for GUB and I have
apt-get installed it.
However, I see that libmpfr is also built by GUB. Not sure if it is
host or cross.
The history here is a bit vague, but in case you haven't
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:15:34AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I'm attempting GUB on 64-bit VM runing Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS
Progress so far attached. Advice welcome.
sorry, one-handed typing while eating.
see gub README for list of requirements. much less than lilypond
build requirements.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:56:58PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:15:33AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I'm attempting GUB on 64-bit VM runing Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS
Build failed on odcctools
that sounds normal, see lilypond-devel list of previous failures.
(with
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
sentence ending punctuation.
I missed something; why not keep . for the thick one? as in the
current |. ?
= cound be
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:39:05AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi David (et al.),
Well, we have two separate complete sentences, and joined with a comma
the reader is easily confused into reading attempts as a verb, even
though admittedly it would be singular and thus not a complete
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Tail of target/darwin-ppc/log/lilypond.log
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/build/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-master/po'
make: *** [all]
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:03:04AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I've done a little more work, see attached.
Any suggestions on how to debug the netpbm script would be welcome.
right. Oops, I'd forgotten about this until just now:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2184
That's
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:30:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you suggested
uploading these to create an unofficial release.
Still of interest?
As a general note, yes. Right at the moment with 2.16 hopefully
in three days, I think
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:07:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
That GUB build just finished, including the docs, and I saw a slew of rsync
invocations near the end of the build:
Er, did that just update the main website by any chance?
no, you don't have a login. But I thought that stuff
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:59:19PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com writes:
On 2012/06/02 09:56:57, dak wrote:
Can you point to a coding standard or rationale for LilyPond
regarding only using @ref?
Yes.
CG 5.4.2: To create links, use @ref{} if the link
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:13:12PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
http://lilypond.org/test/v2.15.39-1/compare-v2.15.38-1/index.html
Good, I'd expect them to be identical.
The only difference is that the Lilypond website says:
1045 below threshold
2027 unchanged
whereas my GUB output says:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:55:20PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:44:53PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:30:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you suggested
uploading these to create
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:50:03PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Hmm. I get no previous results to compare with. Could you let me
know exactly what you've got in your gub/regtests directory, please?
gperciva@gperciva-desktop:~/src/gub (master)$ pwd
/home/gperciva/src/gub
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
See:
http://www.charltonhall.eclipse.co.uk/
That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might
be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere
more robust/cheaper.
Ok. Alternately, you could
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:37:48PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Ok. Alternately, you could only put up a few binaries (say,
darwin-x86, mingw, linux-x86, and linux-64). Also, advertizing it
on lilypond-user as unofficial binaries will probably get you
between 10 and 100 downloads in
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Lilypond Dev lilypond-devel@gnu.org
If anybody else wants to chime in and offer hosting, of course
that would be quite appreciated.
I'm personally
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:14:37PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:24:20PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Alternately, you may want to take a look at improving GUB
yourself, especially since that's how this started. :)
+1
Do you
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:56:33PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
In the hope that it might help others, see attached diary of my
work building a Lilypond release with GUB, making a trivial
edit, pushing the changes to github, and submitting a pull
request to Graham.
Wow! I only gave it a quick
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:56:33PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
In the hope that it might help others, see attached diary of my work building
a Lilypond release with GUB, making a trivial edit, pushing the changes to
github, and submitting a pull request to Graham.
Ok, some more detailed
I'm floating two possibilities for face-to-face lilypond meetings
in the next few months.
UK: I'll be in the Birmingham area on 26 June. Depending on
interest and availability, there could be a short meeting that
day, or a longer meeting including a stay at a BB or something
like that. If
It would be useful if there were a few people interested in
helping prepare discussions for GOP and GLISS. This would involve
a number of 1-3 hour research+writing tasks.
Typical examples of this work are:
- read this 3000-word document and summarize the 10 bullet points
that apply to us,
-
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:37:48PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 29/05/2012 23:11, Graham Percival disait :
Friendly reminder -- since there are no Type-Critical issues
either open or in the issues to verify, 2.15.39 is aimed to
become 2.16.0 in one week.
Do you plan to build
Friendly reminder -- since there are no Type-Critical issues
either open or in the issues to verify, 2.15.39 is aimed to
become 2.16.0 in one week.
If you do not think that this is appropriate, then take
appropriate action in the issue tracker. Do not tell me about it
because I don't want to
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:06:56PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Is there some way I can check the integrity of these installers?
Not a generic way. You could install the ones native to your own
systems (darwin-x86 and linux-x86 inside lilydev, I guess?). If
you have a web server, you could upload
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
Five rounds of guesswork from several developers for a single sentence
would not seem like the most efficient use of manpower for proceeding on
this item.
Agreed; just go ahead and push whatever you have right now.
Regardless of
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:30:50AM +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
Since I don't have a Google account to sign in to
http://codereview.appspot.com/, I attached the patch for 2546.
Don't hesitate to tell me if it's ok or not. (I attached a link to
why prefix is better).
Unfortunately we do not
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:53:32AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Yes. I followed this documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor-big-page#lilydev
http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/LilyDev/ubuntu-LilyDev-remix-2.6.iso
Great! Could I convince you to send a merge
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
I did not see a reaction to this question, so I try again. What
happened with this musicxml2ly bug ? First chords were printed below
the staff, then I think it was fixed, and now the chords are below
the staff again.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30:36PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
Running download_url
('http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2',
'/home/colin/gub/downloads/linux-headers')
{}
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
Is this a surprise?
I'm slightly surprised,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:56:14PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Il giorno lun, 14/05/2012 alle 15.46 +0200, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Either is fine with me. A sensible default value could be
patchy %s % (os.hostname())
assuming there's a command like that in os.
On second thought
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:51:30PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
On 15 May 2012 16:35, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
IIRC the git-cl on my github account adds a URL which allows us to
search for lilypond patches (which would further reduce the chance
of lost patches
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 07:18:58PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
It's nice, but i'd go farther: what about adding an
editorial property to objects? User could mark some items as
editorial and LilyPond would take care of the rest: she would put the
editorial dynamics in brackets, make editorial
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:07:23PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Ok, this time I got
$ cat /home/lilydev/lilypond-auto-compile-results/log-2012-05-14-14.txt
Begin LilyPond compile, commit: c597a126f11943be74a98efee056ab54ae729315
Merged staging, now at:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:51:42PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 14/05/12 11:47, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
This is very hard because of the butterfly effect - an A-flat in an
already-crammed line could lead to new line breaking, which means new
vertical spacing etc..
I don't
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:52:32AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 14/05/12 07:37, Graham Percival wrote:
No. LilyPond is a command-line compiler. That's something that
would happen in an alternate program.
I'm not disputing that, or suggesting that you go into GUI/IDE
territory
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:25:29PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Hi Graham,
Il giorno dom, 13/05/2012 alle 19.24 +0200, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Agreed. I think the most we'd use it for would be LSR. I don't
think we should give ssh logins to developers for testing patches;
that should
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:38:33PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
IIUC the From: field is not read from a config file but is hardcoded
in compile_lilypond_test.py:55, can we set up to a sensible default
value, or should it be made configurable?
Either is fine with me. A sensible default value
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:48:54PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 14/05/12 11:41, David Kastrup wrote:
Before saying anything more, I'm sorry if my earlier email was
offensive or intemperate; it wasn't meant to be.
Ditto.
I was writing out of concern for the ease of
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:28:47PM +0200, Benkő Pál wrote:
dear team and Project Manager,
I'd like to get commit access.
Make an account at savannah, and send a request via the savannah
project page. I'll act on it within 48 hours (wifi connection at
this hotel isn't the greatest).
- Graham
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
I think it's about the big picture stuff and general design. At the
moment, i don't see any vision that we - The LilyPond Development Team
- have about how the future of the project should look like,
oh, I definitely have a vision
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:38:54AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Here you go. :-) Let me know if it needs tweaking or might be
better in another section of the guide.
Please see the summary for experienced developers in the CG.
- Graham
___
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote:
LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line compiler. So this
question can be split into two separate ones:
- what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescobaldi
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 01:56:33PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/05/12 13:37, David Kastrup wrote:
and that does not quite work. It would appear that the error handling
for a missing texi2html script is totally awful. I'd install texi2html
and rerun configure.
Texi2html was
401 - 500 of 5586 matches
Mail list logo
