Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 07:00:27PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
However, even for HTML we need some kind of line width so that we can
line-break all lilypond snippets.
That line width
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:02:51AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
IOError: (0, 'Error')
Lilypond-book returned code 1
Thanks, working on fixes.
As a cheap experiment, could you add this:
### EXPERIMENTAL HACK: see if this makes mingw behave better?
time.sleep(1)
immediately between the
Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5539052/diff/1/Documentation/es/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely
File Documentation/es/extending/scheme-tutorial.itely (right):
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:41:14AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
I don't expect it to work, so I'm writing a more intrusive hack to
hopefully avoid this... but I'd be delighted to junk the larger
hack if that can make it work.
sorry, ignore that. I'm building a new binary with a better fix,
I believe that this should work out of the box on any windows
computer which does **NOT** have texi2pdf or texi2dvi installed.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/lilypond-2.15.25-3.mingw.exe
Trevor, if you have latex set up, you may wish to test it with a
different user account (if you didn't install
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5535047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, please push directly to staging.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5543044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I had tried this very approach a while ago, but there were some
problems. Unfortunately, I can't remember which problems I encountered.
One issue might be that all links to one particular snippet will be
broken with that patch.
If you don't encounter any problems with broken links etc., then
Pavel,
This patch has been approved and pushed.
committer James Lowe pkx1...@gmail.com
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:54:08 + (11:54 +)
commit 427bb2b004227f3afc7de10dfd896fc375cbc320
Please can you close this Rietveld issue?
Thank you for your patch.
James
On 13 January 2012 08:42, paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.
can I kiss someone?
Hey perhaps we need a Kissmeister... any takers? Janek?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Graham, you wrote Friday, January 13, 2012 8:41 AM
As a cheap experiment, could you add this:
### EXPERIMENTAL HACK: see if this makes mingw behave better?
time.sleep(1)
immediately between the
proc = ...
and
(parameter_string, error_string) = proc.communicate ()
lines?
oh, and
I don't think I can close this. I see gray Can't Edit over
Publish+Mail Comments. I tried adding my gnu.org address as an alias
in gmail but it changed nothing. Sorry for not being able to
participate more in the discussion!
http://codereview.appspot.com/5530043/
On 2012/01/13 16:56:54, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I don't think I can close this.
That is quite correct -- James Lowe owns this issue, so only he can
close it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5530043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
2012/1/13 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
On 13 January 2012 08:42, paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.
can I kiss someone?
Hey perhaps we need a Kissmeister... any takers? Janek?
I'm not pretty, so i guess no :P
Thanks for your work,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:02:21AM +, Graham Percival wrote:
I believe that this should work out of the box on any windows
computer which does **NOT** have texi2pdf or texi2dvi installed.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/lilypond-2.15.25-3.mingw.exe
Colin has tested this and found a problem,
Sorry for the late response - my mail provider lost one of
his RAID drives this morning, so I had no mail for some
hours.
Graham, you wrote Friday, January 13, 2012 9:02 AM
I believe that this should work out of the box on any windows
computer which does **NOT** have texi2pdf or texi2dvi
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:36:41 +0100
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Good point, your concerns are valid. However, the difference between
current Lily default beam thickness and average calculated from
samples is so big (almost 0.1 staffspace), that i think we don't have
to worry
On 2012/01/13 16:59:47, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2012/01/13 16:56:54, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I don't think I can close this.
That is quite correct -- James Lowe owns this issue, so only he can
close it.
Sorry, I didn't realise I had the Rietveld as well.
Closed.
18 matches
Mail list logo
