doc help: \layout

2005-06-04 Thread Graham Percival
On 2-Jun-05, at 3:47 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: (Graham, or someone else, we should really try to make sure that all commands and reserved words available in LilyPond are listed in the Index. \layout is one of those missing. Doing such an exercise would also help identifying what information is

Re: Bad link in documentation

2005-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Graham Percival wrote: It seems that the waterloo server is missing the program reference pages. It has the menu pages for program reference, but it gives a 404 for any details. The non-mirror site works ok: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/The-

Re: white-dot / white-text

2005-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Carl Sorensen wrote: Are you viewing the file with your own Ghostscript/GSView combo? If yes, note that you have to use the -dNOSAFER option for GhostScript with these files. Otherwise, you should be able to use the PDF produced by Lily with Acrobat reader or similar. I'm using the

Re: Building 2.5.27 on Fedora Core 3 -- make all fails at mftrace

2005-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: Carl Sorensen wrote: I finally got all the dependencies installed in such a way that I don't think they're broken. potrace.sf.net Does mftrace not depend on potrace? No, it can also work with autotrace. Maybe I should just drop

Re: Building 2.5.27 on Fedora Core 3 -- make all fails at mftrace

2005-06-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: Does mftrace not depend on potrace? No, it can also work with autotrace. Yes, that's what I meant, of course. Let me rephrase: mftrace does depend on having some trace program installed, right? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music

Re: Building 2.5.27 on Fedora Core 3 -- make all fails at mftrace

2005-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: Does mftrace not depend on potrace? No, it can also work with autotrace. Yes, that's what I meant, of course. Let me rephrase: mftrace does depend on having some trace program installed, right? Yes. I've elaborated the error message.

Re: white-dot / white-text

2005-06-04 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 12:59 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I'm still confused: are the PDF files created by your own installed Ghostscript, or with the GS bundled with LilyPond? I assume they're created with the GS bundled with LilyPond. When I open up a command prompt window, there is no gs

Re: white-dot / white-text

2005-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Carl Sorensen wrote: I then opened up a graphical GS window (from my Windows installation) and got the error information I was reporting earlier. BTW, I'm now running again on Fedora Core 3. I get a very similar error when I run lilypond on this system with input/test/fret-diagram.ly. [EMAIL

Re:Lilypond poppler pdf rendering error

2005-06-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Initial Header --- From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : lilypond-devel@gnu.org Cc : Date : Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:39:11 +0200 Subject : Lilypond poppler pdf rendering error Hi all, Many of you must have seen this bug in the rendering of Lilypond-generated

Lilypond 2.5 for windows - command window and PS files

2005-06-04 Thread Paul Hamelinck
Hi! Congratulations with your new MS windows release! I installed it today; I am impressed, that you got the point and click to work in Acrobat! However, I think Ive got a small problem: Each time I open lilypond, it comes up with this welcome to lilypond textfile. Apart from that I

3.5.1 Ancient notation template broken

2005-06-04 Thread Graham Percival
The ancient notation template seems to be using a percussion staff. I can't see anything obviously wrong in the template; could somebody familiar with ancient notation look at it? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/ Ancient-notation-templates.html Cheers, -

Re: 3.5.1 Ancient notation template broken

2005-06-04 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Graham Percival wrote: The ancient notation template seems to be using a percussion staff. I can't see anything obviously wrong in the template; could somebody familiar with ancient notation look at it? Indeed, the result looks quite broken. AFAICS, the template looks