Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 23:05 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Anthony W.
Youngman:
Hi Anthony,
I think that's a pretty usual setup (most people I know have a 32bit
version
of Linux installed on their laptop even though their CPU is actually
64bit).
Sometimes it makes sense to do what
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
Windows machines, not from the actual machines themselves)
As I understand it, people with Windows can:
- run GUB
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op vrijdag 05-06-2009 om 11:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
Branch is not helpful, a separate repo has the advantage of
allowing a simple
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people *with*
Windows machines, not from the actual machines
I tried to answer a question on -user but hit a brick wall.
\unfoldRepeats failed to work when the music block was funneled from 2
separate expressions. Can someone explain this to me? Why does the
following code work for voiceA but not for voiceB?
Thanks.
- Mark
2009/6/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Err... by run GUB, I mean generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe.
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
names.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
Translators *do* need to get all of lily. At least, they need to
get the docs (they translate this after the webpages, right?).
That's a good point. I was thinking, translation of docs is
an exception, but that's
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
What is it that bothers you tracking an additional repo?
To be up-to-date, I need to do a git pull origin
You should only need
git
I've been present for some months now on #lilypond at freenode.net,
so I've decided to mention the presence of this channel at
http://lilypond.org/web/about/index.html
The channel is owned by Simon Plante [cc], I've just asked him
for OPER so that we can make it a bit more official :-)
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 05:08 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
That would have been very useful to know six months ago, when I
wrote the first draft of the CG and asked everybody to check it.
..didn't know about this then, I'm not much of a git guru.
What should we do for
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Mark Poleskymarkpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
I tried to answer a question on -user but hit a brick wall.
\unfoldRepeats failed to work when the music block was funneled from 2
separate expressions. Can someone explain this to me? Why does the
following code work
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
- does anybody feel like making cygwin packages for the missing
software?
Well, for some time I used to be the cygwin maintainer of lilypond.
Was quite nightmare.
- does anybody have VMware (commercial version) and feel like
making a small Linux
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:18 AM
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:03:58AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, June 05, 2009 11:19 AM
There's a surprising amount of interest in contributing to
LilyPond from Windows machines. (err, I mean, from people
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 05:08 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
The actual experiments would be done on a separate branch -- but
only the initial experiments. Basically, I want to:
- merge web/ and master/
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:34:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op zaterdag 06-06-2009 om 03:14 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
What is it that bothers you tracking an additional repo?
To be up-to-date, I need to do a git pull origin
You should only
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.cawrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:46:10PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I read the diff for CG when it came in this morning and the LSR stuff
looks good to me. If you want, we could also include the script I wrote
for
Continuing the thread from November 2007:
(see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg32740.html )
Here is a Python hack that can add numbered notation (Chinese jianpu) to a line
of music. The numbered notation is added as ^\markup commands that include
appropriate EPS files.
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:54:46PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Graham, here's a patch with the script for running and checking
all of the lsr snippets.
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a lilypond shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special
path-to-binary
Does anybody remember which commit was used for 2.13.1? We should
tag that.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 6/5/09 12:18 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
I thought that the previous discussion was actually to separate the web from
the source, i.e., more,
Does anybody remember which commit was used for 2.13.1? We should
tag that.
Isn't it this one?
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=e49c69e6d1e507f60348fa168332175ec6d42b0a
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:54:46PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Graham, here's a patch with the script for running and checking
all of the lsr snippets.
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a lilypond shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need
I've done
make -f lilypond.make bootstrap
without problems, and
make lilypond
builds all the arches. The test output tarball is created, but it
fails the rsync test (?)
- (output from make lilypond)
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/lilypond/gub'
Hi guys,
Graham Percival a écrit :
Eventually, I'd like to have
docs/
docs/web/
docs/learning/
docs/reference/
docs/devel/
docs/snippets/
docs/examples/ (maybe)
with the approporiate translation files in each subdir.
John, if you're reading this: don't worry, I'm going to do
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Err... by run GUB, I mean generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe.
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
In a patch I submitted some days ago...
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Mark Poleskymarkpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
I tried to answer a question on -user but hit a brick wall.
\unfoldRepeats failed to work when the music block was funneled from 2
separate expressions. Can someone explain this to me? Why does the
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Mark Poleskymarkpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does anybody remember which commit was used for 2.13.1? We should
tag that.
Isn't it this one?
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=e49c69e6d1e507f60348fa168332175ec6d42b0a
That is the
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Err... by run GUB, I mean generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe.
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:18:41AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
fortunately, the involved changes in makefiles should not be
too tricky... except for modifying dist target: it is
problematic to release Lily sources with the website, so
docs/web/ should be excluded from this target.
What's
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:41:21PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
So, I'm sorry for the misstep, but I don't see why this happens.
By comparison, I grepped for @code{\a and found this example in
user/vocal.itely, line 168:
Can someone explain why it works in one file but not in the other?
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Paul Scottpsl...@ultrasw.com wrote:
Which is kind of ridiculous if you're writing an ensemble piece with many
(even more than one) voices/parts. How can a midi of a multi-voice work
with any repeats be done?
I was working on a large score and originally kept
I made this change in music-functions-init.ly:
-...@var{\addinstrumentdefinition}.)
+...@code{\addinstrumentdefinition}.)
However, the \a is still showing up as a control character 0x07,
[...]
Can someone explain why it works in one file but not in the other?
Documentation in .ly
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Silas Brownss...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Continuing the thread from November 2007:
(see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg32740.html )
Here is a Python hack that can add numbered notation (Chinese jianpu) to a
line
of music. The numbered notation
Patrick McCarty wrote:
That is the commit that bumped the VERSION file.
Graham wants to know which commit 2.13.1 is based on.
For example, 2.13.0 was based on this commit:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=37a38d4a18943041e4d3623fb3996279f40df290
Ah, I see. Well,
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Err... by run GUB, I mean generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe.
2009/6/7 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Err... GUB stands for Grand Unified Binary. It was a play on
the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUBsubmit=Search!idxname=lilypond-develmax=10result=normalsort=date%3Aearly
Cheers,
2009/6/7 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com:
Interesting. So did the name evolve over time? Now it appears to be
called the Grand Unified Builder:
http://lilypond.org/gub/
-Patrick
see also
http://github.com/janneke/gub
or
http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/gub.git/
--
Francisco
38 matches
Mail list logo
