On 23 Feb 2010, at 02:15, Graham Percival wrote:
You have the law here:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/C-42/page-3.html#anchorbo-ga:l_III-
gb:s_29
...
How seriously have you read the act?
So I have at least checked the relevant section.
Unless the government of Canada webservers are
On 23 Feb 2010, at 03:08, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Sorry, guys, but isn't this discussion drifting into the wrong
direction? The
original post was about the GERMAN wikipedia example, so I don't see
where
Canadian copyright law comes into play.
He is worrying about what happens when he
I think the behavior to use a normalized pitch will be a somewhat
dubious escape route.
For example, it would likely replace deseses by ais when bes would fit
much better with the transposed key.
I consider it likely a better idea to just move the notename in the
direction of the
RMS says he thinks it is better using artificial examples, not risking
a lawsuit when it is so easy to avoid and still have good results.
Hans
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Hans Aberg hab...@math.su.se wrote:
RMS says he thinks it is better using artificial examples, not risking a
lawsuit when it is so easy to avoid and still have good results.
1) I don't care what RMS says.
2) We were *never* going to use a Stockhausen example
3) This whole thread is stupid and pointless and stupid.
Ah... but was it also pointless?
um... the second time...
;)
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Lilyponds marketing-strategy is It looks better than any other
computergenerated notation so people want to see this in the examples.
Whatever the examples are, artifical, public domain or latest hollywood
soundtrack, the way these examples get meaning is to show them between Finale,
Sibelius,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 January 2010 19:44, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I could reproduce this too, so I must have flubbed something in the
process of running `make check'.
Minor update: I also flubbed something while
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
/home/neil/lilypond/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily-library.scm:709:25:
In procedure ly:font-name in expression (ly:font-name font):
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:46 PM, James Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 02:18, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:31:37PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
As I understand it, the critical problems previously had with lilypond on
10.5 (and now 10.6) have
On 23.02.2010, at 21:57, Patrick McCarty wrote:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/
heads/web;hb=web
I would rather spend my LilyPond time on other issues, or else I would
fix it myself.
I don't know how to fix this, or any other issues, otherwise I would
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, James Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 21:57, Patrick McCarty wrote:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/web;hb=web
I would rather spend my LilyPond time on other issues, or else I would
fix it
On 24.02.2010, at 00:25, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:05 PM, James Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 21:57, Patrick McCarty wrote:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;h=refs/
heads/web;hb=web
I would rather spend my
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
1) I don't care what RMS says.
You know you do :)
2) We were *never* going to use a Stockhausen example in the lilypond
docs anyway.
Certainly not. Even Debussy got banned from our docs, for GNU's sake!
3)
Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Hans Aberg hab...@math.su.se wrote:
RMS says he thinks it is better using artificial examples, not risking a
lawsuit when it is so easy to avoid and still have good results.
1) I don't care what RMS says.
Though in this case his
Reinhold,
I see you've been active with Figured Bass fixes to LilyPond. I think
that's great!
Have any of your fixes created a need for changes in the documentation, i.e.
are there things that now work properly but that we talked about workarounds
previously?
Thanks,
Carl
On 2010-02-24, James Bailey wrote:
For the 2.12 file:
197-215
Could be removed
238 MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs)
Could be changed to Mac OS X PPC
For the 2.13 one:
165 -184
could be removed
209 MacOS X (G3, G4, G5 Macs)
Could be changed to MacOSX PPC
I don't know
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Joseph Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
Oh Gawd. Really? Where on earth is he still in copyright?
US-printed scores where still illegal in France when I was a student
(that means less than a decade ago). Our teachers had to smuggle these
when they
18 matches
Mail list logo
