LGTM too.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2275042/diff/18001/lily/stencil-scheme.cc
File lily/stencil-scheme.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/2275042/diff/18001/lily/stencil-scheme.cc#newcode398
lily/stencil-scheme.cc:398: {
Don't say @co...@var{...}} but @var{...}.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
We're about 10-20 hours of work away from having 0 Critical
issues. On one hand, that sounds great; we're almost there! On
the other hand, we've been in this state for the past month. I'm
not seeing a lot of
On 2010/10/24 10:50:52, Carl wrote:
LGTM.
Thanks, pushed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2642041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
It's not _the_ charm, but it's certainly much more charming. Calm down,
take your time, and make it beautiful. I'm not going to start the 2.14
release candidate without this patch, so there's no rush.
Expect to do 1-3 more candidate patches before it's finally accepted.
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Policy highlights:
- convert-ly will be the responsibility of the programmer, not the
doc+translation people. (however, translators are still on the hook for
the current round of updates, as per issue 1358)
- easy copypaste lines to run convert-ly
Description:
Doc: CG:
Congratulations, Valentin, you're on to a winner now!
I've no comments to add to those already made.
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/2699041/diff/9001/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 05:17:26PM -0700, Joe Neeman wrote:
Ok, I get the hint.
Actually, that wasn't my hint -- don't feel that you have to work
on any of this. This is a volunteer project, and you have your
own life. We really appreciate any programming and patch
reviewing that you do,
LGTM.
I'll make a script and put it in my ~/bin that will do the convert-ly.
Do we want to put it in scripts/auxiliar?
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/2687043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 2010/10/25 12:45:38, Carl wrote:
I'll make a script and put it in my ~/bin that will do the convert-ly.
Do we
want to put it in scripts/auxiliar?
Hmm. Initially I was just expecting people to copypaste the relevant
commands... but a shell script is even easier (and more reliable!). The
2010/10/25 v.villen...@gmail.com:
Third time's a charm
Congrats!
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
the link 'usage' to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/index.nl.html
doesn't work on page
http://lilypond.org/manuals.nl.html
greets,
Tom
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
2010/10/25 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
2010/10/23 Tom Eykens i...@muziekzetter.be:
the link 'usage' to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/index.nl.html
doesn't work on page
http://lilypond.org/manuals.nl.html
You are right. That manual is not
Hello. Given this URL, a meesage from March Hohl on september
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-09/msg00329.html
Linked from
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1344
I can not extract the patch from lists.gnu.org, Gmane or Nabble.
Either texinfo @commands are
There you go.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
Date: 2010/9/26
Subject: [Patch:] Corrections in notation/spacing.itely
To: Lily-Devel List lilypond-devel@gnu.org
While working with the new spacing settings, I think I found
some typos.
In general, the
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 15.24 +0200, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
I can not extract the patch from lists.gnu.org, Gmane or Nabble.
Either texinfo @commands are handled as hidden email addresses, or
utf-8 codes mix with latin-1 ones, or both.
Does anyone keep a copy of the message and/or
On 2010/10/25 06:03:36, lemzwerg wrote:
Don't say @co...@var{...}} but @var{...}.
Hmm, have I misinterpreted Mark's post here?:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-09/msg00285.html
http://codereview.appspot.com/2275042/
___
Hi Valentin,
I think this a great improvement on the last patch. Once you've sorted
out the nitpicks, it should be good to go.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/2699041/diff/9001/input/regression/note-names.ly
File input/regression/note-names.ly (right):
Unless anything blows up, I'll announce the first beta test later this
week. The requirements are:
1) 1288 convert-ly policy finished. I'll be sending another patch
in an hour, but I still need an advanced user (or developer) to
manually check the syntax of two files. Details in comments 9 and
This is directed at people saying I can't do anything to help...
As per my comment #4 in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1290
, we could really use an advanced user (or developer) to help with
tweaking the default values for the new spacing code.
REQUIRED
- desire to get
Don't say @co...@var{...}} but @var{...}.
Hmm, have I misinterpreted Mark's post here?:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-09/msg00285.html
Well, have a look at section A.17 (Scheme functions) and see how
function names and arguments are formatted. Mark is referring to
20 matches
Mail list logo
