Am 05.01.2011 10:32, schrieb James:
Hello,
On 05/01/2011 05:44, Graham Percival wrote:
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
It helps the 'beginners' (I find) that I play with
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a 'logotype' or
colophon.
tagline = \markup {
On 2011-01-05 11:09, James wrote:
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
Dito.
It
Am 05.01.2011 11:09, schrieb James:
Marc,
On 05/01/2011 09:50, Marc Hohl wrote:
My contribution to fonts was the rotation of the G clef and the varsegno
sign
(which nobody seems to use, anyway ;-)
Au contraire mon amis!
I use the varsegno glyph at the slightest opportunity!
It helps the
On 2011-01-05 11:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body of text. I suppose some would call it a
It looks like we're getting close to the first release candidate.
- could any new contributors check:
http://lilypond.org/authors.html
to make sure they're there? if you have git access, you should
be in development team, and choose your own title. If not,
you should be listed in current
Hello
On 05/01/2011 10:36, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2011-01-05 11:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a
On 2011-01-05 12:11, James wrote:
No this isn't what I was referring to. [...]
I was thinking more of a 'lilypond' in some
cursive-cum-signature-cum-all-joined-up script,
but something 'created' as a glyph than just put together.
If you think of J S Bach's signature then that could be used
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:11:26AM +, James wrote:
Hello
On 05/01/2011 10:36, Alexander Kobel wrote:
I've mused about trying to create a logo using the markup
commands. If you think about all the graphical ones, plus music
glyphs, there's a lot of options. The d could be a rotated
2011/1/5 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:09:27AM +, James wrote:
Marc,
What I think we need actually - slightly off topic - is a nice
LilyPond-glyph similar in essence to when you see the word 'Latex'
in a body of text. I suppose some would call it
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
together, just for the sake of quoting musical symbols.
You mean something like this?
On 2011-01-05 12:58, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
together, just for the sake of quoting
I've included before and after photos.Cheers,MS
0001-Potential-fix-for-issue-39.patch
Description: Binary data
inline: issue39after.pnginline: issue39before.png___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
together,
Am 05.01.2011 13:33, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Brunifedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end up too clumsy IMHO;
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:20:06 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
Yup, that's what I meant. I know a couple of amateur musicians who
copied some musical symbols to replace single characters of their names
for their letterheads. I can't think of a single one which doesn't look
ugly. Sizes
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
they end
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:17:51PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, um 13:33:26 schrieb Graham Percival:
That looks quite busy to my taste. My latest 5-minute hack is
something like this:
Attached is a small modification (created in inkscape rather than
Colin,
On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
You should probably move me from Documentation to Bug Squad, James. At
the moment, I don't think I can manage both, but perhaps I can return to
the fold later in the year!
No problem.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:30:29PM +, James wrote:
Colin,
On 05/01/2011 13:33, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 +, James wrote:
You should probably move me from Documentation to Bug Squad, James. At
the moment, I don't think I can manage both, but perhaps I can
Greetings List,
I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described
as using an outdated version Lilypond.
I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is
(still) valid.
Denemo works with 2.12 and 2.13 just well and emits that version
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:49:03PM +0100, Nils Gey wrote:
I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described
as using an outdated version Lilypond.
I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is
(still) valid.
We have asked for
Hello,
I want to create a score follower, that is a software which shows the scores and
the current position I am playing on my keyboard. I tried some rendering engines
(Guidolib, Musescore, ...), but Lilypond has the best graphical output. Now I
need informations about the scores like pitch,
Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box? A dedicated webmaster
(maybe in personal union with other tasks) is a good thing because people like
to have one person as contact if they have problems with the webpage. I
strongly recommend to
Hello
On 05/01/2011 12:27, Konstantin wrote:
Hello,
I want to create a score follower, that is a software which shows the scores and
the current position I am playing on my keyboard. I tried some rendering engines
(Guidolib, Musescore, ...), but Lilypond has the best graphical output. Now I
Nils
On 05/01/2011 15:22, Nils Gey wrote:
Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box?
The website is generated in the same way we generate all of our
'documentation' (there are some differences but essentially it is the same).
That is
James james.lowe at datacore.com writes:
[snip]
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=965
I have tried this - I don't really use Linux but I managed to get this
working sort (as my Linux machine is in a VM I used similar tools on a
Mac), however I am not sure this is what you
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Issue 879
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
\remove Hara_kiri_engraver
\consists Hara_kiri_engraver
I know I don't properly
Hello
On 05/01/2011 15:44, Konstantin wrote:
Jamesjames.loweat datacore.com writes:
[snip]
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=965
I have tried this - I don't really use Linux but I managed to get this
working sort (as my Linux machine is in a VM I used similar tools on a
On 1/5/11 8:44 AM, Konstantin kammerm...@gmx.de wrote:
James james.lowe at datacore.com writes:
[snip]
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=965
I have tried this - I don't really use Linux but I managed to get this
working sort (as my Linux machine is in a VM I used
Konstantin,
I have a metadata patch floating around that can help you kludge your way
through this. It is not too hard, but will require some work:
1) Create a sort of metadata property for whatever grob you wanna trace.
2) for those grobs, create an override for the print method that first
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: Can't compile docs
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:06:56PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I've been creating
Reviewers: ,
Message:
here is the patch set I hinted at several times:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-11/msg00212.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-01/msg00097.html
some changes are just very slightly related:
mf/parmesan-custodes.mf just makes
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I think
it would be appropriate to remove my name from the Current development team
list.
Mine too, please. I don't think I've done anything in this release.
Nicolas
2011/1/5 James james.l...@datacore.com:
Nils
On 05/01/2011 15:22, Nils Gey wrote:
Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box?
The website is generated in the same way we generate all of our
'documentation' (there are some differences but
2011/1/5 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
The attached patch removes the box.
Sorry! use this instead, the other removes a @divEnd and it shouldn't.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
From 0ebb81d9a8f278cd1c9211936100b13419def84b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:59:58PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 11:37, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
Since I haven't been very active on the LilyPond lists the last year, I
think it would be appropriate to remove my name from the Current
development team list.
Mine too,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:43:47PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:38 +, Graham Percival wrote:
I think you should be listed in both places; I certainly don't
think you should removed from the Documentation list. If somebody
has worked in multiples areas, they
Mike Solomon mikesol at ufl.edu writes:
I've included before and after photos.
Hi Mike.
The hemidemisemiquaver(*) and the minim are supposed to be simultaneous, so I
do not like the horizontal shift.
There is no mention in issue 39 of the desired output. The only thing I can
imagine wanting
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/5 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
The attached patch removes the box.
Sorry! use this instead, the other removes a @divEnd and it shouldn't.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
None of these warnings happen in the other languages, so I think
they're all problems in the german source, rather than in our build
system.
make website
...
Initializing settings for web site: [de]
** closing warning (1 braces missing) (l. 319)
*** Undefined node `Development' in @ref (in
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:30:09PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
pdfTeX warning (dest): name{Invoking abc2ly} has been referenced but does not
e
xist, replaced by a fixed one
pdfTeX warning (dest): name{Invoking musicxml2ly} has been
referenced but does not exist, replaced by a fixed one
These
43 matches
Mail list logo
