Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 2:57 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 10:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
In order to not have the override/revert stack get into unexpected
interactions, I want to change
Werner LEMBERG wrote Sunday, August 21, 2011 6:13 AM
Well, it helps in situations like this
This is a paragraph with some text to
demonstrate that a path name like
/usr/local/share/lilypond/foo.bar
should be split after backslashes.
which looks better with a break
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Sunday, August 21, 2011 6:13 AM
Well, it helps in situations like this
This is a paragraph with some text to
demonstrate that a path name like
/usr/local/share/lilypond/foo.bar
should be split after
On 8/21/11 1:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 2:57 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/19/11 10:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
With this architecture, I don't think
On So., 21. Aug. 2011 02:33:06 CEST, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
My thought for the architecture is to have two sets of properties -- the
context set and the \once set.
That's exactly what I was about to propose, too. override basically sets the
default, vbut a once always always
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/21/11 1:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
My suggestion
would be
\set x = 4 ; setting the default
\override x = 5 ; context set has 5
\override x = 2 ; context set has 5 2, result 5
\once\override x = 3 ; context
Hey all,
I just realized that in this patch, the Span_bar_stub_engraver could be
bumped down a level to the Lyric context to avoid the Grob_info
rerouting. Lemme know if this seems like a good idea.
Another solution as well would be to create multiple SpanBars for the
same timestep in the same
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
* Type-ugly: replaces Type-collision, and it will include
things like bad slurs in addition to actual collision.
Think we need to change the description of this on the tracker to make it
clear it's not just
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
On So., 21. Aug. 2011 02:33:06 CEST, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
My thought for the architecture is to have two sets of properties -- the
context set and the \once set.
That's exactly what I was about to propose, too. override
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, August 21, 2011 9:33 AM
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
changing and/or to and/@/or is bad (one you
changed recently.) Splitting such short strings
will make little difference to the
layout, and I would argue that placing
the /or at the start of a
Well, it helps in situations like this
This is a paragraph with some text to
demonstrate that a path name like
/usr/local/share/lilypond/foo.bar
should be split after backslashes.
which looks better with a break after the backslash:
This is sensible, and I agree
- Original Message -
From: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Make doc is broken
Hi Phil,
Am Saturday, 20. August 2011, 16:26:48 schrieb Phil Holmes:
I think Reinhold's commit
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 05:01:38 schrieb Dan Eble:
On 2011-08-20, at 16:00 , Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Hmm, do you have any example file where this appears (even if it's not
minimal, for now it's just important that we can reproduce it somehow).
I wonder if this has anything to do
On 8/21/11 3:01 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/21/11 1:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
My suggestion
would be
\set x = 4 ; setting the default
\override x = 5 ; context set has 5
\override x = 2 ;
Am Friday, 19. August 2011, 05:11:30 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:21:03AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Am Friday 19 August 2011, 02:29:22 schrieb percival.music...@gmail.com:
On 2011/08/18 11:42:13, Reinhold wrote:
Why did you change all dsa to rsa?
It's not only
Hi,
I made a mistake when pushing 0fa2313ae40ae4419b635193bce21dd2c17c02f4
As you can see, I pushed some other patches by error.
Sorry for that, they are reverted. I didn't tried to make a git push -f
origin [previous HEAD]:master. This could have done worse...
Bertrand
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:30 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/diff/13002/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc#newcode669
lily/tuplet-bracket.cc:669: // have to re_run numbers to check for
number-on-number collisions
This is getting a bit complicated. Do you think it's
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 8/21/11 3:01 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
\override -- pushes a value on the stack to remain until reverted
\once \override -- pushes a value on the stack to last only for this time
step. Should be marked as special since it is a \once
Pushed as 9c319db89ecc46cbf6c9c35e759eba973e412bb0.
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
http://codereview.appspot.com/4893044/diff/1/scripts/build/output-distance.py
File scripts/build/output-distance.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4893044/diff/1/scripts/build/output-distance.py#newcode481
scripts/build/output-distance.py:481: print Replacing old filename
That didn't take too long - I scrapped the previous try and went at it
from a different angle. This should do the trick!
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
LGTM.
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188051/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi all,
As a nice inauguration of me having git push ability, i broke my
repository :) git pull seems not to work properly.
Here's what i did:
- in step 6 from here
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/commit-access
i mistakenly called
config remote.origin.url \
On 2011/08/18 11:42:06, Reinhold wrote:
On 2011/08/18 11:21:22, PhilEHolmes wrote:
LGTM too. My suggestion would be to add some instructions about
actually
pushing. It took me a while to convince myself that all that
appears to be
needed is to have an unpushed commit and type git push.
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 20:30:09 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
As a nice inauguration of me having git push ability, i broke my
repository :) git pull seems not to work properly.
Here's what i did:
- in step 6 from here
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/commit-access
i
Janek Warchoł janek.lilypond at gmail.com writes:
As a nice inauguration of me having git push ability, i broke my
repository :) git pull seems not to work properly.
Your commit looks fine on the repository, so nothing to worry about there.
I would expect another line in your
On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
commit 9c319db89ecc46cbf6c9c35e759eba973e412bb0
Merge: 49ef4f0 fb47959
Author: Mike Solomon m...@apollinemike.com
Date: Sun Aug 21 17:19:28 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond
For the record, I
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 20:39:05 schrieb m...@apollinemike.com:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
commit 9c319db89ecc46cbf6c9c35e759eba973e412bb0
Merge: 49ef4f0 fb47959
Author: Mike Solomon m...@apollinemike.com
Date: Sun Aug 21 17:19:28 2011 +0200
Merge
2011/8/21 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 20:30:09 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
As a nice inauguration of me having git push ability, i broke my
repository :) git pull seems not to work properly.
Here's what i did:
- in step 6 from here
I pushed the patches for issues 1779 and 1785, the ones that made small changes
to *lots* of regression tests.
Probably you want to absorb these changes in new `make test-baseline`
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Janek Warchoł janek.lilypond at gmail.com writes:
I would expect another line in your configuration, added below:
[remote origin]
url = ssh://janekw at git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
fetch = +refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master
Probably you want to go
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 21:26:38 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Did the git pull give any messages?
I don't remember what it said the first time, but now it says
From ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond
* branchmaster - FETCH_HEAD
Current branch master is up to date.
The
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This should do the trick.
The regtests don't really help as they show tons of fake changes. I'll
try Han Wen's suggestion for hacking output-distance.py in the next week
if I am still having trouble.
The only thing that currently seems broken is
2011/8/21 Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com:
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 21:26:38 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Did the git pull give any messages?
I don't remember what it said the first time, but now it says
From ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond
* branch master -
Hi,
I don't understand what happens (and why) when i try to update one of
my local branches.
Here's the background: i made a branch and applied a patch done by
Keith to it. Later a modified version of Keith's patch was pushed to
origin/master (i guess). Now I try to pull and rebase and a
Am Sunday, 21. August 2011, 23:43:21 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
janek@janek-lilydev5:~/lilypond-git$ git status
##now this looks strange - shouldn't it say something like modified:
this, this and this?
Nope, after you manually resolved all conflicts of the rebase, the conflicting
patch does not
Il giorno ven, 12/08/2011 alle 09.07 -0700, Graham Percival ha scritto:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:27:53PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/8/12 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
Il giorno ven, 12/08/2011 alle 16.49 +0200, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
Processing web site: [it]
Regarding the addition of instructions on how to push, I'd like to do
that in a separate patch, unless an experienced developer cares to send
me a rough sketch, point form perhaps, which I could then repackage in
documentation format.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4898058/
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
Given that Cmake has a large following (examples include KDE and
LLVM), I'd be comfortable with switching to that.
Interesting; have you ever used Cmake?
Lately I've been doing tweaks to
quick remarks
- Why are the flags called maybeflags in the engraver?
- Currently, the stem already does width/2 X-offset, can't you
piggyback on that?
- You're copying me and jan's name in the header. If anythingn, you
should probably put your own.
(we could consider just using The lilypond
40 matches
Mail list logo
