Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

2012-10-05 Thread James
Hello, On 5 October 2012 00:19, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote: This is a proposal to move the triplet/tuplet discussion forward. There will be new commands to supplement (or eventually replace) the current \times command. 1. \tuplet n/m {music expression} % does what \times does, but

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

2012-10-05 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Hello James, Ian and list, On 05.10.2012 09:10, James wrote: Hello, On 5 October 2012 00:19, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote: This is a proposal to move the triplet/tuplet discussion forward. There will be new commands to supplement (or eventually replace) the current \times command. 1.

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

2012-10-05 Thread Keith OHara
Ian Hulin ian at hulin.org.uk writes: Questions: 1. Should the new \tuplet [...] \tuplet 3/2 {c8 c c} because that reflects better the three notes in the time of two definition of a triplet. It is easier to keep the order straight if you write a 5:4 tuplet as \tuplet 5/4 {} We have to

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk writes: 1. Should the new \tuplet retain the \times meaning of the fraction, i.e. \tuplet 2/3 {c8 c c} uses 2/3 because that's what you'd use if you were just using durations: c8*2/3 c c , or invert it as \tuplet 3/2 {c8 c c} because that reflects better the three

Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - was [talk] easy tuplets

2012-10-05 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
On 2012-10-05 09:10, James wrote: Hello, On 5 October 2012 00:19, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote: This is a proposal to move the triplet/tuplet discussion forward. There will be new commands to supplement (or eventually replace) the current \times command. 1. \tuplet n/m {music

Re: allowing \f and \F

2012-10-05 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:26 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: It's likely a more important consideration to divide the Guile and LilyPond namespace rather than the LilyPond and user space. To wit, convert xxx = \something into #(define $xxx $something) I assume that this would mean

Re: allowing \f and \F

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:26 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: It's likely a more important consideration to divide the Guile and LilyPond namespace rather than the LilyPond and user space. To wit, convert xxx = \something into #(define

Re: allowing \f and \F

2012-10-05 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:26 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: I assume that this would mean having to use #(define ) every time we wanted to define a variable/command (e.g. notes = { c d e } and red = \twear #'color #red). Huh? Why? I

Provide an \un function for turning overrides and sets into reverts and unsets (issue 6588067)

2012-10-05 Thread janek . lilypond
please provide usage example(s). I suppose i like this idea, but without examples i don't know what exactly will be possible, and what won't be possible. thanks, Janek http://codereview.appspot.com/6588067/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

lilypond-book: treat iffalse sections in latex as block comments (issue 6584073)

2012-10-05 Thread janek . lilypond
Hmm. Somehow the commit message doesn't seem self-explanatory enough to me, but i fail to formulate why i have this feeling. http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: [GLISS] syntax features nobody ever heard of.

2012-10-05 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: xxx #'j #'k #'l = 7 #(format #t xxx = ~a\n xxx) xxx = #'() xxx #'j #'k #'l = 7 #(format #t xxx = ~a\n xxx) this is really weird indeed. Janek ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread phileholmes
Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92 Merged staging, now at: c9d806f28ab690c3f210e14153c6bd31d506588e Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure Success:../configure --disable-optimising Success:

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: philehol...@googlemail.com To: gra...@percival-music.ca Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:11 PM Subject: Patchy email from PhilH Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92 Merged staging, now at:

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From: philehol...@googlemail.com To: gra...@percival-music.ca Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:11 PM Subject: Patchy email from PhilH Begin LilyPond compile, commit:

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:55 PM Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From: philehol...@googlemail.com To:

unofficial GOP proposal organization of GLISS discussions

2012-10-05 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi all, i find it hard to keep up with our GLISS discussions. I've also heard that the amount of technical details, digressions and multithreadedness stops some people from participating, as they don't have enough time to read long conversations carefully. Therefore i suggest to visibly

Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052)

2012-10-05 Thread janek . lilypond
Marc wrote: (define-bar-line ...) or \defineBarLine allows for new definitions. These functions have four arguments, namely the bar line itself, the bar line used at the end of line, the bar line used at the begin of a new line and the span bar line. It just occured to me: is there any way to

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:55 PM Subject: Re: Patchy email from PhilH Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: - Original Message - From:

Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052)

2012-10-05 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/5 janek.lilyp...@gmail.com: Marc wrote: (define-bar-line ...) or \defineBarLine allows for new definitions. These functions have four arguments, namely the bar line itself, the bar line used at the end of line, the bar line used at the begin of a new line and the span bar line.

Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread Thomas Morley
Hi, I wasn't aware that the following works: \layout { \context { \Score \time 3/4 } \context { \Staff %\key cis\major \clef bass } } \relative c' { c2. \break d } Interesting. \key

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: Hi, I wasn't aware that the following works: \layout { \context { \Score \time 3/4 } \context { \Staff %\key cis\major \clef bass

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: \shape Slur #'((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) /media/IntelSSD/patchybuild/autobuild/build/out/lybook-db/61/lily-1564b6f0.ly:144:12: error: wrong type for argument 2. Expecting string or music, found ((-0.5 . 1.5) (-3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: Hi, I wasn't aware that the following works: \layout { \context { \Score \time 3/4 } \context { \Staff %\key

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: 2012/10/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2358 Patch: Allow music with layout instructions in output definitions. Seems to be another one of your patches hardly reviewed. Actually, Janek

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread Thomas Morley
2012/10/6 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: 2012/10/5 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2358 Patch: Allow music with layout instructions in output definitions. Seems to be another one of your

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:27 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: \key ... doesn't work this way. What a pity! Doesn't work by set/override. would it be feasible to make it work this way? (you don't have to write a full explanation - i'm

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread Thomas Morley
Sorry, sent an empty mail, clicking wrongly. 2012/10/6 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com: 2012/10/6 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: [...] If my comments are above even your level, then it is not really surprising that I get little to no reviews. That does not leave much of an audience.

convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-05 Thread julien . rioux
Reviewers: , Message: For review: Description: convert-ly: - Exit with error status when errors occur. - Use unicode strings for file names printing. - Don't update \version when no rule is applied. This fixes issue 2670. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/

Re: lilypond-book: treat iffalse sections in latex as block comments (issue 6584073)

2012-10-05 Thread julien . rioux
Try to add a regression test example with a valid lilypond block inbetween two multiline comments. http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/diff/1/python/book_latex.py File python/book_latex.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/diff/1/python/book_latex.py#newcode88

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

2012-10-05 Thread John Mandereau
Il giorno ven, 05/10/2012 alle 08.11 -0700, philehol...@googlemail.com ha scritto: Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 4ed5d7710416aff0a9e68f0d751b4e15c30fdf92 Merged staging, now at: c9d806f28ab690c3f210e14153c6bd31d506588e Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure

Re: lilypond-book: treat iffalse sections in latex as block comments (issue 6584073)

2012-10-05 Thread lemzwerg
http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/diff/1/python/book_latex.py File python/book_latex.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6584073/diff/1/python/book_latex.py#newcode88 python/book_latex.py:88: \\iffalse.*\\fi))''', On 2012/10/06 02:12:41, Julien Rioux wrote: .* should be replaced by

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-05 Thread lemzwerg
http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/2001/scripts/convert-ly.py File scripts/convert-ly.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/2001/scripts/convert-ly.py#newcode357 scripts/convert-ly.py:357: sys.exit(errors) Are you going to report the number of errors using the `errors'

Re: Nice layout-feature

2012-10-05 Thread David Kastrup
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:27 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes: \key ... doesn't work this way. What a pity! Doesn't work by set/override. would it be feasible to make it work this way?