http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode3961
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode4087
Werner LEMBERG wl at gnu.org writes:
I lean towards letting numbers in function arguments just evaluate
to themselves, never mind units.
Sensible.
+1. However, it should be documented, together with the work-around.
It was only a couple months ago that David allowed 3\cm to be used as
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Werner LEMBERG wl at gnu.org writes:
I lean towards letting numbers in function arguments just evaluate
to themselves, never mind units.
Sensible.
+1. However, it should be documented, together with the work-around.
It was only a couple months
On 10/08/2012 01:03 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Actually, thinking of it, it would actually be quite simple to calculate the
displayed fraction with durations from the given durations and the tuplet
fraction (except that there is no way to distinguish 3:2 and 4:6).
(m*dur1):(n*dur2) = tuplet
2012/10/8 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Werner LEMBERG wl at gnu.org writes:
I lean towards letting numbers in function arguments just evaluate
to themselves, never mind units.
Sensible.
+1. However, it should be documented, together with the
Ian,
On 6 October 2012 16:40, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
On 05/10/12 08:10, James wrote:
Hello,
On 5 October 2012 00:19, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
This is a proposal to move the triplet/tuplet discussion forward.
There will be new commands to supplement (or eventually
David Kastrup writes:
Negative connotation. But reversed (see below) it is not actually that
bad.
it is strongly recommended that only experienced users try working with
this release. Everyone else is encouraged to use the stable 2.16
version instead.
Something like that.
Why not
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/10/8 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Werner LEMBERG wl at gnu.org writes:
I lean towards letting numbers in function arguments just evaluate
to themselves, never mind units.
Sensible.
+1.
On 10/07/2012 01:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
I'd rephrase the first two sentences as
This version contains work in progress. Only users who are prepared to
deal with crashes or unexpected ...
+1
I think this is the best way to characterize it. You might want to rephrase it
slightly to
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
-
This version contains work in progress. You will have access to the very
latest features, but some may be incomplete, and you may encounter bugs and
crashes. If you
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup writes:
Negative connotation. But reversed (see below) it is not actually that
bad.
it is strongly recommended that only experienced users try working with
this release. Everyone else is encouraged to use the stable 2.16
version
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
-
This version contains work in progress. You will have access to the very
latest features, but some may be incomplete,
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
I have no problem with having more commands in that while 'musos'
might have their terms, I have the good fortune to play with
semi-professionals and also teachers who when I queried said [I
paraphrase], well sure I guess you could technically call them that,
On 10/08/2012 01:29 PM, James wrote:
I have the good fortune to play with
semi-professionals and also teachers who when I queried said [I
paraphrase], well sure I guess you could technically call them that,
but 'no one really does' and besides when do you stop calling them
their numerically
Hello,
On 8 October 2012 14:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 10/08/2012 01:29 PM, James wrote:
I have the good fortune to play with
semi-professionals and also teachers who when I queried said [I
paraphrase], well sure I guess you could technically call them
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote Monday, October 08, 2012 1:19 PM
I think this is the best way to characterize it. You might want to rephrase
it
slightly to make it more personal to the reader:
-
This version contains work in progress. You will have access to
On 2012/10/08 07:46:09, Keith wrote:
Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely:4087: -\tweak
#'control-points
#'((-2 . 3) (-1 . 3.1) (0 . 3.2) (1 . 2.4)) ( )
g2( ) f is the same as g2( f)
so any implication that the does something different might mislead.
They are, of course,
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond 2.17.4 released
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode3901
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Speaking as a user:
I never used 3\cm (don't like it), but I know others did (in \paper ).
So no objection from me, and there will be the workaround.
Wait, does David suggest to change things so that we won't
The changelog says
Don't update \version when no rule is applied.
That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does. If this
is intended to be the default behaviour now, then the command-line
option should be removed. I would rather keep convert-ly as-is (in
terms of this
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode3961
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:08 PM, gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The changelog says
Don't update \version when no rule is applied.
That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does. If this
is intended to be the default behaviour now, then the command-line
option should be
On 2012/10/08 20:08:20, Graham Percival wrote:
The changelog says
Don't update \version when no rule is applied.
That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does.
No, that's what the existing -d --diff-version-update is supposed to do.
The problem was that if the last
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Speaking as a user:
I never used 3\cm (don't like it), but I know others did (in \paper ).
So no objection from me, and there will be the workaround.
Wait,
Hi,
i had some spare time when commuting, so i've written down a few
thoughts on this topic.
First, we shouldn't mix content and presentation. I think it's a very
important rule; one of the best things in LilyPond is that she allows
to separate music from its layout.
I think that what Joseph
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Wait, does David suggest to change things so that we won't be able to
write \paper { indent = 2\cm } ?
No, he doesn't.
Or does the suggested change concern something else?
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 08/09/12 16:10, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I have in the past talked with people from Henle; also, Schirmer has a
style guide that you can order as a book.
How far in the past are we talking about?
2012/10/8 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
[...]
Joseph mentioned scores in which tuplet style changes all the time. I
think that a proper solution to this problem is to create custom
shortcuts for overriding TupletNumber style - this way you still have
layout separated from score
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
So, i believe that LilyPond shouldn't always follow her users'
intuition, even if they are professional musicians. In this case, i
think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet 3/2 (for 3 notes in time
of 2), because it corresponds
On 2012/10/08 20:04:21, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM
Thanks!
Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely:3901: @itemize
technically this would be better as an @enumerate a, but this isn't a
big deal.
Ah yes, I'd forgotten that. I'll change it in the next patch set,
since I have to
2012/10/8 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
So, i believe that LilyPond shouldn't always follow her users'
intuition, even if they are professional musicians. In this case, i
think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet 3/2 (for 3 notes
David Kastrup wrote Monday, October 08, 2012 10:45 PM
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
So, i believe that LilyPond shouldn't always follow her users'
intuition, even if they are professional musicians. In this case, i
think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
\override Bottom.TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text) = rit.
as
\override Bottom.TextSpanner bound-details.left.text = rit.
I like this.
Voila.
URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2883
--
David Kastrup
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, October 08, 2012 10:45 PM
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
In this case, i
think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet 3/2 (for 3 notes in time
of 2), because it
On 10/08/2012 10:44 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
First, we shouldn't mix content and presentation. I think it's a very
important rule; one of the best things in LilyPond is that she allows
to separate music from its layout.
Yes, fair point. But one thing to be careful of particularly as regards
2012/10/9 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, October 08, 2012 10:45 PM
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
In this case, i
think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet
On 10/08/2012 11:25 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
But once I saw a bigband-part for guitar, notated with changing clefs
between bass and treble.
Well, it was the real treble, no transposition. That it was the real
treble was only understandable from the context.
The real stupidity there is surely
On 10/09/2012 01:12 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Absolutely! Inverting the fraction for \tuplet was the original reason
for inventing it, IIRC.
Woah, really? I thought the whole point was to avoid the
confusion between \time and
21:58:01 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
c7a3623a056891d48b13fe14fd6ee042ac666822
21:58:27 Merged staging, now at:c7a3623a056891d48b13fe14fd6ee042ac666822
21:58:29Success:sudo -u lilybuild ./autogen.sh
--noconfigure
21:59:05Success:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, October 08, 2012 10:45 PM
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
In this case, i
think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet
LGTM, without testing, and without really understanding the change.
However, simplifications and generalizations are always a good thing.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6635050/diff/1/Documentation/de/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/de/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/17001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/17001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode3916
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, October 08, 2012 10:45 PM
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
So, i believe that LilyPond shouldn't always follow her users'
intuition, even if they are professional musicians. In this case, i
45 matches
Mail list logo
