Microtonality (was: improving our contributing tools and workflow)

2013-09-27 Thread David Kastrup
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes: On 26 Sep 2013, at 17:16, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: The section originates with me but I got diverted into trying to create a more elegant solution for how to rewrite accidentals in transposed music. It was all related to the need for an

Re: improving our contributing tools and workflow

2013-09-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Graham Percival writes: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:05:44PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: - plain email-based patch submission using a benevolent dictator, ie, use git the way it was designed and is still used by the creators (linux, git). Are you volunteering to be that benevolent

Re: arrow notation for quarter-tones, issue 1278 (was: improving contributing tools)

2013-09-27 Thread Hans Aberg
On 27 Sep 2013, at 00:05, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, 2013/9/26 Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com: On 26 Sep 2013, at 17:16, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: Joseph Wakeling wrote: I was also rather discouraged by the fact that the quarter-tone arrow notation

Re: Microtonality

2013-09-27 Thread Hans Aberg
On 27 Sep 2013, at 08:45, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes: On 26 Sep 2013, at 17:16, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: The section originates with me but I got diverted into trying to create a more elegant solution for how to rewrite accidentals

Re: Quarter-tone arrow notation [was: Re: improving our contributing tools and workflow]

2013-09-27 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 26/09/13 18:38, David Kastrup wrote: You commented on the issue where this patch originated as late as July: URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1278#c7. So it's hard to argue that it was not discoverable to you. This July I got an email update from the issue, and

Re: Quarter-tone arrow notation [was: Re: improving our contributing tools and workflow]

2013-09-27 Thread David Kastrup
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net writes: On 26/09/13 18:38, David Kastrup wrote: You commented on the issue where this patch originated as late as July: URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1278#c7. So it's hard to argue that it was not discoverable to

PATCHES: Countdown for October 1st - 06:00 GMT

2013-09-27 Thread James
Hello, *Countdown – October 1st – 06:00 GMT* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3582http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3582q=label%3APatch-countdownsort=patchcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Summary%20Modified Enhancement David Kastrup countdown Patch:

Re: improving our contributing tools and workflow

2013-09-27 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 27/09/13 03:44, Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: This risks becoming another corrosive discussion, Then WTF are you starting it? Because I had hoped that what I said was sufficiently qualified not to create bad feeling.

scripts: improve strip-whitespace.py (issue 13720049)

2013-09-27 Thread julien . rioux
LGTM. You might want to add to your comment at the top: Also convert the file to Unix line endings. https://codereview.appspot.com/13720049/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

no critical: 2.18 is close?

2013-09-27 Thread Federico Bruni
I see there's no critical issue in the tracker. I remember that you used to publish release candidates of next stable when we have no critical issues. So I wonder if the releae of 2.18 is close or there's something that it's blocking it.. Just curious.. and also I want to organize my translation

Re: no critical: 2.18 is close?

2013-09-27 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes: I see there's no critical issue in the tracker. I remember that you used to publish release candidates of next stable when we have no critical issues. So I wonder if the releae of 2.18 is close or there's something that it's blocking it.. The

Re: no critical: 2.18 is close?

2013-09-27 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 1:33 PM Subject: Re: no critical: 2.18 is close? Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes: I see there's no critical

Add backup option to convert-ly (Issue 3572) (issue 14040043)

2013-09-27 Thread PhilEHolmes
Reviewers: Julien Rioux, dak, Message: Initial patch to check the principle is OK. Will require documentation updates before it's pushed. Please review Eluze's Python. Description: Add backup option to convert-ly (Issue 3572) Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/

Re: no critical: 2.18 is close?

2013-09-27 Thread Trevor Daniels
David Kastrup wrote Friday, September 27, 2013 1:33 PM I think after letting 2.17.27 settle for a few days, we are ready to create the branch. We still might make another 2.17 release afterwards to get some exposure to final fixes (like the \fill-line markup), but it better not have any

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3566 in lilypond: Grace notes should beautobeamed

2013-09-27 Thread Trevor Daniels
Comment #6 on issue 3566 by d...@gnu.org: Grace notes should be autobeamed I don't think the current state warrants a convert-ly rule: it does not seem like the previous behavior is used to any reasonable degree, and it can always be reverted by removing the engraver. Anything that has

Release News - to include something about convert.ly

2013-09-27 Thread James
Hello, Would it be worthwhile that we add an extra sentence in the 'release news' (Documentation / web / news-front.itexi) informing users that they might need to use convert.ly - just that we occasionally get users 'forgetting' or not knowing that they _might_ need to use convert.ly for newer

Re: Release News - to include something about convert.ly

2013-09-27 Thread Phil Holmes
I did mean to consider doing something like that with the most recent release, but also forgot... Please remember that new releases can require syntax changes. Please use convert-ly (web link) to make most of these automatically. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: James

Re: Add backup option to convert-ly (Issue 3572) (issue 14040043)

2013-09-27 Thread julien . rioux
This suggestion from David sounded like a good default: Make numbered backups for files that have numbered backups already. https://codereview.appspot.com/14040043/diff/1/scripts/convert-ly.py File scripts/convert-ly.py (right):

Stem direction snippet

2013-09-27 Thread Phil Holmes
I've added a snippet (http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=751) to master that explains how to set stem direction based on surrounding notes. Anyone object to my adding it to selected snippets in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#stems - I think it makes

Re: Stem direction snippet

2013-09-27 Thread Trevor Daniels
Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 27, 2013 8:54 PM I've added a snippet (http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=751) to master that explains how to set stem direction based on surrounding notes. Anyone object to my adding it to selected snippets in

Make Adding extra fingering with scheme snippet do something useful (issue 13826047)

2013-09-27 Thread thomasmorley65
LGTM Question: considering LSR-update, I recently added an earlier version of it to the LSR http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=887 Should I replace it with this one? https://codereview.appspot.com/13826047/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list