On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:02:01AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
there is a long-ish explanation about the release process in our
latest LilyPond Report:
http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26#the_road_to_2_16
Can we get a news item for this? and maybe a (general) email to
the
Hi fellow-users,
I don't know whether I have one joint problem or two separate ones. My
apologies for running them together in the same post if they are in reality
separate issues.
I'm putting together a vocal (choir) score in the key of G major which has
five repeated sections. I tried
Philip Thomas philip.tho...@bluewin.ch writes:
Hi fellow-users,
I don’t know whether I have one joint problem or two separate ones. My
apologies for running them together in the same post if they are in
reality separate issues.
I’m putting together a vocal (choir) score in the key
Hi,
for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary
music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary
composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra
work in every score implementing the accidentals explicitely although
its behaviour
Dear Urs,
I just have one thing to add to the discussion: *do* use one of the
repository tools! No matter which one (you had some suggestions already),
but do use one! I do so since about 10 years (csv originally, converted to
subversion some -- more than 6, I think -- years ago), and even for
Orm Finnendahl o.finnend...@inm.mh-freiburg.de writes:
Hi,
for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary
music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary
composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra
work in every score
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:37:33 Uhr (+0200) schrieb David Kastrup:
\accidentalStyle neo-modern does not match your requirements?
its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
accidental (even if
On 2012-05-21 13:09, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
My suggestion for the name of this style would be contemporary
That only works from our particular point of view. If someone runs
Lilypond sometime far into the distant future or in the distant past,
they wouldn't see it as contemporary. I'd suggest a
I'm stuck :-(
Why doesn't this work as I expect? .
\version 2.15.36
\time 4/4
\set Timing. BeatStructure = #'(1 1 1 1)
c8 c c c c c c c
This should result in four groups of two beamed notes, isn't it?
But I always get two groups of four notes.
The same problem with 3/4, but with 5/4 I can do
Orm Finnendahl writes:
\accidentalStyle neo-modern does not match your requirements?
its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
accidental (even if it's stated in the foreword).
Question is: is
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
I'm stuck :-(
Why doesn't this work as I expect? .
\version 2.15.36
\time 4/4
\set Timing. BeatStructure = #'(1 1 1 1)
c8 c c c c c c c
you have to clear BeamExceptions if i remember correctly.
HTH,
Janek
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:58:14 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Question is: is neo-modern used and appreciated as it works right now
and do we indeed need a contemporary style, or should neo-modern
behave like Orm describes?
I would opt for that. The only situation, I know of,
2012/5/21 Susan Dittmar susan.ditt...@gmx.de:
Dear Urs,
I just have one thing to add to the discussion: *do* use one of the
repository tools! No matter which one (you had some suggestions already),
but do use one!
I'd like to add just one more idea. You could use a CVS such as Git,
and maybe
Thanks, that was it.
OK, it# in the docs, but I had to re-read it three times until I got it :-(
Best
Urs
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Urs Liska
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 16:18:16 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Orm Finnendahl:
The example for neo-modern in the documentation actually is an
excellent example for a situation where the musician has to ask about
the second fis because it's not obvious if the accidental has been
accidentally
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Susan Dittmar susan.ditt...@gmx.de wrote:
One thing you will have to think about is check-in policy though. I
personally like to check in very often, but that means the checked in
version might not compile, let alone be in a state acceptable to use.
I
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I'm dealing with special noteheads I've designed and I need to move the
stem and the flag differently if stem direction is up or down.
I would like to create a guile lisp clause that sets the
Hello,
I'm dealing with special noteheads I've designed and I need to move the
stem and the flag differently if stem direction is up or down.
I would like to create a guile lisp clause that sets the extra-offset
value accordingly to the Stem position.
I was trying this, but it does not
Aha, I thought: try adding an invisible barline at the beginning of
bar 5. That works fine to position the volta bracket correctly, but it
also makes the barline at the end of bar 4 invisible also, even when I
add a manual single barline at the end of bar 4. (See Example B
below.)
Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu:
\override Stem #'extra-offset =
#(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP)
'(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25)))
Hello David,
thank you very much!
Now I see that ly:stem::calc-direction only gives me the standard Stem
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil Thornock neilthorn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
I'm not happy with
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik escreveu:
\override Stem #'extra-offset =
#(lambda (grob) (if (eqv? (ly:stem::calc-direction grob) UP)
'(-0.02 . -0.25) '(0.02 . 0.25)))
Hello David,
thank
Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the
second part of your message.
Thank you again!
2012/5/21 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Em 5/21/12 11:44 AM, David Nalesnik
Thank you so much for the responses! Trevor’s solution was successful (using
alignBelowContext).
I feel like I scoured the manuals for this, and saw nothing of using it for
this purpose — A.4.3 SATB with aligned contexts doesn’t really demonstrate why
you’d want to use that construct over the
José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh, I'm sorry... I was reading everything in a hurry and didn't got the
second part of your message.
No problem! I learned something new about ly:stem::calc-direction because
of your email: didn't know that it
Hi again,
so.. as the flags are now separate objects (2.15.38), I'm having
problems to move them to the same place that I am moving the stems... if
I just reproduce the lambda function I am using with Stems with flags,
it does not work...
\once \override Stem #'extra-offset =
Hi José,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:25 PM, padovani zepadovani.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi again,
so.. as the flags are now separate objects (2.15.38), I'm having problems
to move them to the same place that I am moving the stems... if I just
reproduce the lambda function I am using with Stems
Hi again,
It would be possible to offset both of them, but I think you might be
better served by approaching the problem from a different angle. You can
control the relative positioning of stem and note head through
'stem-attachment, which is a property of NoteHead. The flag will move
Hello.
I'm trying to write a tremolo that fills a 4/4 bar. I used the code
below and I got this error message:
Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T
Drul_arrayT::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
== -1' failed.
{ \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 g } }
Hi David,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's the true LilyPond way: instead of fixing the same thing all the
time, write one fix once and for all - kudos! I
To David and Nick,
I thank you very much for your kind help.
I have now plenty of new ways to emprove my left fingering notation.
Pierre
2012/5/17 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
On 16/05/12 17:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Nick
Colin Jesse Kinlund wrote Monday, May 21, 2012 5:06 PM
Thank you so much for the responses! Trevor’s solution was
successful (using alignBelowContext).
I feel like I scoured the manuals for this, and saw nothing of using
it for this purpose — A.4.3 SATB with aligned contexts
doesn’t
2012/5/21 Philip Thomas philip.tho...@bluewin.ch:
Aha, I thought: try adding an invisible barline at the beginning of
bar 5. That works fine to position the volta bracket correctly, but it
also makes the barline at the end of bar 4 invisible also, even when I
add a manual single barline at the
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
I'm searching for a way to display A7(#5)
Regards,
\r
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Snippet:
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
r2 r8
\new Voice = melody {
\autoBeamOff
\partial 4. c'4.^\markup {Sjung.}
% Rehersal mark A
\mark \default
\slurDown
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
r2 r8
\new Voice = melody {
\autoBeamOff
\partial 4. c'4.^\markup {Sjung.}
% Rehersal mark A
\mark \default
\slurDown
Dear Susan,
thank you for the valuable input.
What you describe is basically what I thought how it works - but didn't
know for sure due to lack of experience.
Especially the aspect of branching is interesting, as I didn't really
have an idea about that.
So what you describe as the intention of
2012/5/21 John McWilliam jsmcwill...@gmail.com:
(...)
The snippet seems to compile without any errors
Well, it returns:
atest-14.ly:757:16: error: unknown escaped string: `\Bkey'
\Bkey
atest-14.ly:757:16: error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
\Bkey
2012/5/21 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Added as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=838
-David
Hi David,
I'm going to approve your snippet.
I'd prefer to use the Standalone-snippet-option (I changed it this way).
What do you think?
-Harm
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
What do you mean by 'status'? It works for me. I've tweaked the
markup to suit my tastes, and have added some additional
Hi Urs,
In addition to version control your team may need the concept of a
build token.
The person holding the token has the right to merge in their latest
work and, in so doing, break the project. They also have the
responsibility to leave it in a working state before releasing the
token for
Hi Harm,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/5/21 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Added as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=838
-David
Hi David,
I'm going to approve your snippet.
I'd prefer to use the
Am 22.05.2012 00:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
Hi Urs,
In addition to version control your team may need the concept of a
build token.
The person holding the token has the right to merge in their latest
work and, in so doing, break the project. They also have the
responsibility to leave it in a
Hi Janek,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi David,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
wrote:
[ ... ]
You get
44 matches
Mail list logo
