Hi list,
I would like to transcribe the notes from Ludwig Erk’s Liederhort.
Unfortunately, I don’t know how to handle these two things:
* In some songs, there are dotted voltas, which – I guess – are there to
indicate an optional repeatition.
* Some songs also feature tiny notes, which are
{a4 e g es-\tweak X-offset #3.8 ^\markup\tiny/ \bar ;a2-\tweak
X-offset #-1.3 _\markup\tiny\\ a4 a4 }\\{s4 s \tiny g8\noBeam g8
s4}
Because it is absolutely a kludge it is certain someone else can do
better, but this does work though it might need a fair amount of
fiddling. The lower wing needs
Given that NoteNames are really a type of lyrics, is it possible to have a
function that just takes music and returns a text string that is a lyric.
For example:
music = \relative c' { c4 d e f g a b c }
notenameLyric = \NoteNameToLyric \music
would make
notenameLyric = c d e f g a b c
so
On Nov 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Jay Vara j...@diljun.com wrote:
Given that NoteNames are really a type of lyrics, is it possible to have a
function that just takes music and returns a text string that is a lyric.
For example:
music = \relative c' { c4 d e f g a b c }
notenameLyric =
Michael == Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com writes:
Well, in this case you don't have any conflicting music in the two
Voice contexts (because the \structure isn't a printed music
voice). So you can simply leave out the \voiceXXX commands and
you're ready.
What's more, is there
Hi Thomas,
Attached a possible code.
HTH,
Pierre
2014-11-23 19:28 GMT+01:00 Thomas U. Grüttmüller sloym...@gmx.net:
Hi list,
I would like to transcribe the notes from Ludwig Erk’s Liederhort.
Unfortunately, I don’t know how to handle these two things:
* In some songs, there are dotted
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Jay Vara j...@diljun.com wrote:
Given that NoteNames are really a type of lyrics, is it possible to have
a function that just takes music and returns a text string that is a lyric.
I've been learning lilypond this weekend, so forgive me if this is a question
with an obvious answer, but I am having trouble getting slurs to work with
\parallelMusic. If the slur marker is on the note at the beginning of the
line, I get a fun error. This:
\parallelMusic #'(va dynD vb) {
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:46 PM, pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote:
What's more, is there a reason to have the structure in a different
voice?
Good question. For me, it's mostly about the DRY principle (don't repeat
yourself). I'm in the process of writing a program that tries to maximize
Michael == Michael Ellis michael.f.el...@gmail.com writes:
Michael On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:46 PM, pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au
Michael wrote:
What's more, is there a reason to have the structure in a different
voice?
Michael Good question. For me, it's mostly about the DRY principle
Michael
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Peter Chubb pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au
wrote:
My point I think is that the structure is the structure of the voice,
not the structure of the staff. Which is why, BTW, the MIDI repeats
don't unfold.
Visibly the structure voice shows the repeats, but the
Hi Ted,
The answer is in your question : you're putting slurs at a wrong place and
phrasing slurs at the right one.
See attached,
HTH,
Pierre
2014-11-24 2:50 GMT+01:00 Ted Lemon mel...@fugue.com:
I've been learning lilypond this weekend, so forgive me if this is a
question with an obvious
On Nov 24, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is in your question : you're putting slurs at a wrong place and
phrasing slurs at the right one.
Hm, okay. So a (b c d) is wrong, and a( b c d) is right? I tried putting
the regular
2014-11-24 6:56 GMT+01:00 Ted Lemon mel...@fugue.com:
Hm, okay. So a (b c d) is wrong, and a( b c d) is right?
Here both are ok; you simply omit to put any bar check: So a | (b c d) is
wrong, and a( | b c d) is right.
Cheers,
Pierre
___
On Nov 24, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Here both are ok; you simply omit to put any bar check: So a | (b c d) is
wrong, and a( | b c d) is right.
So to be clear, I am asking whether the behavior we are seeing is intended for
some reason
15 matches
Mail list logo
