Re: tempo and different staves

"matpen3@gmail" writes: > Hi all, > > is there a reason why tempos aren’t assigned to the staves, after > removing them from score? I'd ask the person who removed them from the score. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing

tempo and different staves

Hi all, is there a reason why tempos aren’t assigned to the staves, after removing them from score? Thanks matteo Tempo_differentStaves.ly Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Hi Paul, Thanks so much. I had somehow got it into my thick skull that Qt5 was required, hence I got myself into a thorough mess. I note 2.19 uses python 2 and not python 3 - also had me mixed up. All now works. Apologies for the noise, all. Andrew On 23/04/2016, 10:32 AM, "Paul Morris"

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions

Hi David, > It strikes me as conceptually problematic to try to put a fermata on a > multi-measure rest. > Who does this, and what does it mean, musically? > In this example, you are actually placing a fermata on a single bar of rest. > In which case, this works fine: > { \compressFullBarRests

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Hi Andrew, > On Apr 22, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > The 2.19 release seems premature. The contents of the tar file have code that > clearly refers to Qt4. Um, so... 2.19 still uses Qt4. In the future, version 3.0 will require Qt5 (and Python3).

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Hi Wilbert, The 2.19 release seems premature. The contents of the tar file have code that clearly refers to Qt4. On Debian 8.4, the current git master builds after a long session struggling to manually solve dependenices, and then when run, simply unceremoniously dumps core. I have a pristine,

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions

> Try the following ... > > f1->\fermata R1*3 R1\fermata > > The first fermata prints fine. The second fermata prints > "programming error: Object is not a markup." in the log and doesn't > print. It strikes me as conceptually problematic to try to put a fermata on a multi-measure rest. Who does

Re: Staff bracket and figured bass

Hi Marcin, here is a way to replace the standard SystemStartSquare: % - \version "2.18.2" voiceone = \relative c' { c c g' g a a g2 \bar "|." } voicetwo = \relative c { \clef "bass" c'4 c c, c f f c2 } space = \markup \transparent

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Il giorno ven 22 apr 2016 alle 19:34, Federico Bruni ha scritto: $ python setup.py build running build running build_ext Failed to determine Qt version ([Errno 2] No such file or directory). I'm stuck here Ok, I didn't check the sheebang in setup.py... so I did: rm -r

Re: Staff bracket and figured bass

Hi Marcin, you can stop the "flowing" by putting a \new FiguredBass between the two staves: % - \version "2.18.2" voiceone = \relative c' { c c g' g a a g2 \bar "|." } voicetwo = \relative c { \clef "bass" c'4 c c, c f f c2 } space

Re: drawing eigth-note in /markup

Hi Ryan, try: \markup { \note #"8" #UP "=" \note #"8" #UP } Maybe you're also interested in http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1029 Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context:

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: > On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > >David K wrote: > >>>Hm? How could you even have a compressed multi-measure rest when there > >>>is anything like an "8-bar phrase" in parallel? > >>>That sounds like a problem that

drawing eigth-note in /markup

Hello I would like to draw a simple eighth note = eighth note in the ^\markup{} on a particular bar of music. How can I draw two eighth notes in a markup block without a staff? Please see attached for what I am going for. Thanks! Ryan. -- ॐ नमः शिवाय

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Il giorno ven 22 apr 2016 alle 7:55, Wilbert Berendsen ha scritto: Then Frescobaldi 2.x will go in bugfix mode and development of new features will concentrate on Frescobaldi 3.0, which will require Python3 and Qt5. Qt5 looks good! Wilbert, when I launch current master I get

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Thanks for the new release. When do you expect it to appear in MacPorts? Thanks, Steve ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 161, Issue 86

Thanks for the new release. When do you expect it to appear in MacPorts? Thanks, Steve ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 16:55, David Kastrup wrote: >The first fermata prints fine. The second fermata prints "programming >error: Object is not a markup." in the log and doesn't print. So >that's another bug tracked down in my piece, That's_explicitly_ what \fermataMarkup is for. If people consulted

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Hi, > f1->\fermata R1*3 R1\fermata You can use \fermataMarkup { R1\fermataMarkup } I know it looks more like a workaround than something one would expect, but it works. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Staff bracket and figured bass

Hi, I am working on critical edition of some 18th century music. I was working for many years in Finale, but after discovering Lilypond, I want to prepare my scores in this program. I almost succeeded, still have some problems. 1) I need to change the default staff bracket - I know I could use

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 16:24:06 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: > On 22/04/2016 14:49, Paul Scott wrote: > >>I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest happens > >>>in the part, not in the full score — but one wants not to have to use > >>>multiple \tag constructs just to

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Am 22.04.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > Especially 800% zoom is very useful. +1 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: error: can't allocate region - layout block?

Hi Carl, thanks a lot for your time. I’ll try it m > Il giorno 22 apr 2016, alle ore 17:20, Carl Sorensen ha > scritto: > > On 4/22/16 7:11 AM, "matpen3@gmail" wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I¹m again plagued by a memory error: >> >>

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Anthonys Lists writes: > On 22/04/2016 14:49, Paul Scott wrote: >>> I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest happens >>> >in the part, not in the full score — but one wants not to have to use >>> >multiple \tag constructs just to handle this

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 14:49, Paul Scott wrote: I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest happens >in the part, not in the full score — but one wants not to have to use >multiple \tag constructs just to handle this issue. Me too. I asked a long time ago and got the idea that I

Re: error: can't allocate region - layout block?

On 4/22/16 7:11 AM, "matpen3@gmail" wrote: >Hi all, > >I¹m again plagued by a memory error: > >lilypond(27883,0xa2db5000) malloc: *** mach_vm_map(size=106917888) failed >(error code=3) >*** error: can't allocate region >*** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug I

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Wol: Scan through the thread starting at and see if anything there helps. Good luck, Kieren. Just scanned it - unfortunately I'm using \markup on an s, rather than \mark, for

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: David K wrote: >Hm? How could you even have a compressed multi-measure rest when there >is anything like an "8-bar phrase" in parallel? >That sounds like a problem that cannot occur. I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest

Re: partcombine and tag

Gianmaria Lari writes: > I'm trying to understand how to use partcombine and tag and I don't > understand why compiling the following code I obtain two measures > > 4 4 | 4 > > instead of just one > > 4 4 4 > > In the attached image the resulting score. > > Here it is

Re: Termination of variable definitions

On 19/04/2016 21:55, Johannes Waldmann wrote: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-04/msg00465.html ... But it's recursive. what does that mean? - J.W. Recursion: See "Recursion". To take the violin example, violin = \new Staff { \relative { a'4 b c b } }

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:31:17AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Wol, > > > My usual bugbear ... :-( > > I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo mark, > > […] > > Yeah… this causes me no end of grief, too. > It probably represents a good 10% of my score/part

partcombine and tag

I'm trying to understand how to use partcombine and tag and I don't understand why compiling the following code I obtain two measures 4 4 | 4 instead of just one 4 4 4 In the attached image the resulting score. Here it is the code. %%% \version "2.19.40" note = \partcombine {e'4} {\tag

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Hi Wol, > My usual bugbear ... :-( > I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo mark, […] Yeah… this causes me no end of grief, too. It probably represents a good 10% of my score/part tweaking time. David K wrote: > Hm? How could you even have a compressed

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Anthonys Lists writes: > My usual bugbear ... :-( > > I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo > mark, and a tune name all wanting to be over the same barline (this is > an arrangement, where there are several tunes and each is identified >

Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

My usual bugbear ... :-( I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo mark, and a tune name all wanting to be over the same barline (this is an arrangement, where there are several tunes and each is identified where it occurs). So I have something along the lines of

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Thanks for all your hard work Wilbert! That's a lot of new features! This app had become a staple for me. Any idea when the manuscript viewer might be ready? Best, Abraham On Thursday, April 21, 2016, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > Dear all, > > Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

On 22.04.2016 07:55, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Dear all, Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. There are quite a lot improvements and some nice new features. Bravo and thanks a lot! Especially 800% zoom is very useful. Best, Simon ___

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

Am 22.04.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Johan Vromans: >> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. > Good job! Thanks! > >> - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in the PDF >> (LilyPond >= 2.19.39) can be used in publish mode and the custom engrave >> dialog (#813) > I must

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.19.0

> Frescobaldi 2.19.0 has been released into the wild. Good job! Thanks! > - The new LilyPond feature to embed source code files in the PDF > (LilyPond >= 2.19.39) can be used in publish mode and the custom engrave > dialog (#813) I must have missed this in the discussions... What can I do

Re: listesso tempo

Greg writes: > This is a little simpler: > > \version "2.18" > \relative c' { > \time 4/4 > | c4 c c c > \tempo \markup { >\fontsize #-1 { > \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1 > "=" > \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1 >} > } > \time 3/4 >

Re: listesso tempo

This is a little simpler: \version "2.18" \relative c' { \time 4/4 | c4 c c c \tempo \markup { \fontsize #-1 { \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1 "=" \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1 } } \time 3/4 | c c c | c2. } You could not use \general-align but the =

listesso tempo

I want to write an indication that the beat continues at a meter change. I found in the notation manual a solution with \tempo \version "2.18" \relative c' { \time 4/4 | c4 c c c \tempo \markup { \concat { \smaller \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1 " = " \smaller

Re: Scheme error message

Hi Andrew, thank you for these explanations. I wouldn't have thought of trying the construct in another Scheme implementation (although Racket should still be installed somewhere on my PC ...). So it more or less boils down to a syntax error that Guile doesn't really understand. Maybe because