Re: Line break ruins tie

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:30 PM, David Wright wrote: > > So it seems you have several choices: > remove the accidental, > shrink it, > allow the tie and accidental to collide, > invert the tie (^~), > shorten it, > forbid a linebreak just there. \override

Re: Is anyone maintaining midi2ly?

On Sat 30 Dec 2017 at 23:11:04 (+), Michael Ellis wrote: > David Kastrup wrote: > >- I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar >checks that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout. > > Thanks for testing it, David. What options did you use for midi2ly and >

Re: Line break ruins tie

On Thu 04 Jan 2018 at 22:57:03 (-0600), Ivan Kuznetsov wrote: > Andrew Bernard wrote: > > > > Only very quickly sketched, and rather deficient, but a more 'normal' voice > > arrangement system, and the tie to the f sharp is clear. > > When I compiled your snippet, the

Re: Line break ruin's tie

Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Only very quickly sketched, and rather deficient, but a more 'normal' voice > arrangement system, and the tie to the f sharp is clear. When I compiled your snippet, the exact same issue was present: the tie to the F-sharp is not clear at all.

Re: Line break ruin's tie

Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Why don't you just create the three voices and notate inside > each one continuously? Because this music constantly goes back and forth between homophonic chords and contrapuntal voices. This is one of the few places in the 150_ measures that

Re: Line break ruin's tie

Hi Ivan Only very quickly sketched, and rather deficient, but a more 'normal' voice arrangement system, and the tie to the f sharp is clear. You can adjust this a thousand ways, and you could turn off the accidental at the new line too if you want [with \override

Re: Line break ruin's tie

Hi Ivan, You have a set of voices for one bar, and then another set for the next bar. Somewhat strange. Why don't you just create the three voices and notate inside each one continuously? keeping it simple like this makes work a whole lot easier I find. Andrew

Line break ruin's tie

The two measure snippet of code appended below creates the notation that I want. The Fsharp of measure 1 is very clearly tied to the Fsharp of measure 2. However, when I use these two measures in my actual score, lilypond happens to puts a line break between those two measures, and the notation

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

Dear Werner, and Dear all, I dont want to set NDT for new compositions. I just want to enjoy diversity of engraving, with their different valid points. And surely we will continue to play barock and polypnohic music for many years. In the mean time, I had and deeper and serious look to Scheme

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> That's not a function but a markup command. No namespace conflict (the >> symbol defined is whiteout-markup-command I think). >> ... >> Different namespace as well. > > Thanks for the clarification! I'm not sure it's a

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

Hi David, > That's not a function but a markup command. No namespace conflict (the > symbol defined is whiteout-markup-command I think). > ... > Different namespace as well. Thanks for the clarification! I'm not sure it's a great idea to add a third 'whiteout' thing to Lilypond… but it's good

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

Kieren MacMillan writes: >> I checked with `lilypond scheme-sandbox` to see that it didn't exist...? > > Lilypond contains both a function > >

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

Okay, thanks for the heads-up. I guess I'll rename it to `hole` instead. On 01/04/18 19:05, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> I checked with `lilypond scheme-sandbox` to see that it didn't exist...? > > Lilypond contains both a function > >

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

> I checked with `lilypond scheme-sandbox` to see that it didn't exist...? Lilypond contains both a function http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/snippets/editorial-annotations#editorial-annotations-blanking-staff-lines-using-the-_005cwhiteout-command and an interface property

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

I checked with `lilypond scheme-sandbox` to see that it didn't exist...? On 01/04/18 18:56, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi "Caagr98", > >> I also made this function to add holes in the bracket (requires setting the >> bracket's layer to -1): >> whiteout = > ... > > I'm not sure that redefining

Re: Holes in spanners for tall notes

Hi "Caagr98", > I also made this function to add holes in the bracket (requires setting the > bracket's layer to -1): > whiteout = ... I'm not sure that redefining that particular function is your best long-term plan… Maybe rename it to something that doesn't conflict with existing