Sorry, I can neither activate nor get updates for XP in my virtual
machine with a proper licence. I'll bow out of this now.
Andrew
On 14/10/2022 3:21 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
OK./ I'm running up Windows XP 32 bit on a VM. I'll see if I can help out.
>> So you checked all of LilyPond's dependencies and can guarantee
>> that it will stay like this forever?
>
> I am on Big Sur (11.6) and I can still choose 10.9 as a deployment
> target. [...]
>> I'm not going to work on anything. I have been alone trying to get
>> a build for macOS even
OK./ I'm running up Windows XP 32 bit on a VM. I'll see if I can help out.
Andrew
> I thought I had downloaded the Lilypond file from the list that you
> mentioned, but to make sure, I repeated the download and made sure I
> downloaded (lilypond-2.22.2-1.mingw.exe) from the list you suggested
> for 32 bits systems. Unfortunately, I had the same result as the
> first time:
>
On Fri 14 Oct 2022 at 00:16:39 (+), Dag Bergman wrote:
> > On Wed 12 Oct 2022 at 23:51:22 (+), Dag Bergman wrote:
> > > I have a Windows XP computer with Lilypond 2.10.25. It works fine with
> > > simple program codes and advanced code developed with earlier versions of
> > > Lilypond.
Just saying I'm happy to help you out with XP etc but this is probably
getting OT, so we could do it offline if you care to.
Andrew
Each to his own. But allow me to mention that VueScan supports hundreds
of scanners, it not every scanner, and provides a very good solution to
that if you are ever interested.
It's unfair to say Microsoft has made network file sharing difficult
(why would they try?). Millions of users have
Thanks again Werner for your reply.
You stated in an earlier email: "You are trying to use a 64bit program in a
32bit environment, which
always fails."
I thought I had downloaded the Lilypond file from the list that you mentioned,
but to make sure, I repeated the download and made sure I
Hi David,
Thanks for your reply.
I run Windows 10 on a rather powerful Dell-Precision with an i7-7700HQ CPU and
32.0 GB RAM.
I run Windows XP on an old computer because I love that operating system as it
has a superior user interface to Windows 10. XP makes much better use of the
screen
Still curious now about XP. There's no certainty next versions will work.
Andrew
On 14/10/2022 10:42 am, Dag Bergman wrote:
Thanks Karlin and Michael for your kind replies, and for considering how to
test Lilypond versions on a Windows XP machine.
It appears to be far too complicated for you
Thanks Karlin and Michael for your kind replies, and for considering how to
test Lilypond versions on a Windows XP machine.
It appears to be far too complicated for you to do that and I only expected
people to take the trouble to reply in case they already knew what was going
on. Thank you,
Hello Dag,
As mentioned in my post Windows XP is way, way past any support from
Microsoft (EOL 2009!). A couple of others have queried why it is
necessary for you to be running this system also. Before people go to
extraordinary lengths to source XP machines to try to help, would you
ever so
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 1:45 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-13 1:31 pm, Knute Snortum wrote:
> > I have a situation that seems like it would be straightforward. I
> > want four eighth notes beamed with the first eighth looking like a
> > half note. I thought I could just do this:
> >
> > {
On 2022-10-13 1:31 pm, Knute Snortum wrote:
I have a situation that seems like it would be straightforward. I
want four eighth notes beamed with the first eighth looking like a
half note. I thought I could just do this:
{ b2*1/4[ b'8 b' b'] }
But that code doesn't attach the beam to the
I have a situation that seems like it would be straightforward. I
want four eighth notes beamed with the first eighth looking like a
half note. I thought I could just do this:
{ b2*1/4[ b'8 b' b'] }
But that code doesn't attach the beam to the first note and produces
two warnings:
warning:
On Wed 12 Oct 2022 at 23:51:22 (+), Dag Bergman wrote:
>
> I have a Windows XP computer with Lilypond 2.10.25. It works fine with
> simple program codes and advanced code developed with earlier versions of
> Lilypond. It does not work so well when I try to use a newer program
> developed
On 10/13/2022 10:27 AM, Michael Hendry wrote:
run legacy software on a Windows XP virtual machine
That reminds me -- Windows 7 Pro with its XP Mode based on Microsoft
Virtual PC, that would be less of an ask.
I have remote access to one of those, but it is at a customer's place
and is
On 13 Oct 2022, at 15:35, Karlin High wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2022 6:51 PM, Dag Bergman wrote:
>> I get the error message: “The system cannot execute the specified program.”
>
> This seems like a pretty broad error. I see mentions of needing Right-Click
> -> Properties -> Unblock, to allow a
David Wright writes:
> No problem for a 1.5GHz 32-bit processor with 512MB memory.
> BTW the term "plain x86" is almost meaningless. For a start,
> are you talking about the processor, or the architecture?
> Debian's "amd64" architecture is still an x86, just 64-bit.
Well, for one thing one
On Mon 10 Oct 2022 at 12:06:11 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 10/10/2022 06:43, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > The problem isn’t LilyPond’s or its dependencies’ support for older macOS,
> > which is better than even the system support. The real problem is Apple
> > preventing you from upgrading
On 10/12/2022 6:51 PM, Dag Bergman wrote:
I get the error message: “The system cannot execute the specified program.”
This seems like a pretty broad error. I see mentions of needing
Right-Click -> Properties -> Unblock, to allow a downloaded executable
to run.
Other cases involve system
> How do I know which of the versions listed and offered for download
> are for 32 bits or 64 bits systems?
*All* versions given in my link are 32bit versions. Recent 64bit
versions are provided on gitlab. Note that we no longer provide 32bit
versions.
Werner
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Not exactly a supported platform nowadays. [...]
I would be curious if (older) LilyPond versions would work under ReactOS[1]..
~ Hendursaga
[1] https://reactos.org/
Thanks Karlin for your quick reply.
Yes, I used the first link you asked about and found it in the list that your
second link leads to.
I will try the other two versions you suggested, but if all versions in that
list are only for 64 bits system (if I understood Werner's reply correctly),
Thanks Werner for your quick and elaborate reply.
I guess you are correct that the error messages I received are due to changes
in the syntax between versions of Lilypond. The problem is that using
`convert-ly` would probably only work if running an old script with a later
version of
On 10 Oct 2022, at 20:29, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> Yes, I build on macOS 10.15 and it will work on versions newer than
> that, as also announced with the first release of this infrastructure:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-02/msg00155.html
I wanted to say that I didn’t
26 matches
Mail list logo
