On Fri 08 Jul 2016 at 14:08:57 (-0400), Benjamin Strecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Vaylor Trucks wrote:
> > I found the problem. Invoking lilypond-book with --left-padding 0 solved
> > the problem.
> >
>
> That is a much better solution.
Agreed. To be honest, I
On Fri 08 Jul 2016 at 17:21:17 (+), Vaylor Trucks wrote:
> Vaylor Trucks gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm not sure if this is a LaTeX question or a Lilypond question.
>
> After some digging, the definitely seems to be a Lilypond issue. If I look
> in the output directory I specify in invoking
On Fri 08 Jul 2016 at 14:50:03 (+0200), Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
> I didn't have the opportunity to look at Bach's handwriting. I have
> checked two edited versions. One uses 4/4, the other C (not cut C).
> So I gather that's correct.
Hold on, are you saying that the second Kyrie of BWV232 is *not*
On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 23:17:26 (-0700), Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> A long time UNIX user myself (pre 1970’s…), I follow what you are saying,
> but you may want to explain to ordinary folks what clearing the caches does
> and the command 'echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ‘, especially since the
>
On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 19:37:54 (-0700), BGM wrote:
> Thanks for you interest, fellas.
>
> I downgraded lilypond to version 2.19.36-1 and everything works as expected
> - that is, it compiles any of my scores normally in just a second or two.
>
> My problems were all with the latest lilypond
On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 15:15:42 (-0700), BGM wrote:
> Well, it seems like it hangs on just starting lilypond. (and, as I've
> mentioned, I didn't have this problem with version 2.18)
>
> As soon as it gets past this line...
> So, this line takes 99% of the time in the progressbar:
> Starting
On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 00:52:53 (-0700), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> This may be the standard, but it is woefully ambiguous, and text-centric.
> In the case of a music composition, is is the composer or the engraver? Is
> the ‘document’ the music, or the setting of it?
Neither. It's the PDF document
On Wed 06 Jul 2016 at 10:21:15 (-0700), rosros wrote:
> I would like to recover the value of the lilypond version statement to insert
> it in the tagline.
>
> With "\simple #(lilypond-version)" I can recover the current lilypond
> version which is not necessarily the same string.
>
> Is there a
On Tue 05 Jul 2016 at 08:36:00 (-0300), Marcelo Carneiro de Lima wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. When I say "Gui" I mean the same interface I have on
> Mac OS, for instance. I mean the possibility to work directly on Lilipond
> without Frescobaldi or Denemo, writing code on Lilypond's own text
On Sat 02 Jul 2016 at 09:21:00 (-0700), dtsmarin wrote:
> Hello,
> I want to create a Staff type which will be used for hiding extra staves Ι
> don't need.
> Since I use every other available type of staves (Group,Grand,Piano etc.)
> applying removeemptystaves will also affect other staves that I
On Sun 26 Jun 2016 at 13:14:42 (-0500), Br. Gabriel-Marie | SSPX wrote:
> In my piece I have a piano staff with the music on the bottom staff.
> In the upper staff it is supposed to be notes for recorder or flute
> accompaniment. In the original the flute notes and its staff are
> all a bit
On Fri 24 Jun 2016 at 13:17:02 (+1000), Don Gingrich wrote:
> What I think that I want to do may simply be
> impossible -- I'll say that at the start.
>
> When I see full scores for a number of songs published,
> it is clear that the reason that various verses are printed
> separately is that
On Thu 23 Jun 2016 at 16:12:56 (-0500), Br. Gabriel-Marie | SSPX wrote:
> Well, I know how to do *that* - that is, I know how to get text
> above and below the staves.
>
> But I want text above and below the scores - sort of like a
> subtitle.
>
> At the end of each page, about 3/4 inch below
On Thu 23 Jun 2016 at 09:45:51 (+1000), Harald Christiansen wrote:
> I got your email and I've tried.
>
> In my case it either increases the space between the G and F keys within
> the PianoStaff (which I don't want)
> or does nothing (depending on where I place it)
Well it would do. That's
On Tue 21 Jun 2016 at 17:21:54 (-0700), BGM wrote:
> You see, I don't want the verses to line up with the chorus. It should go
> like this:
>
> chorusmusic
> chorustext
>
> versemusic
> verse1
> verse2
>
> So it ought to show as if it were two different pieces, one above the other,
> but it
On Tue 21 Jun 2016 at 15:59:04 (-0400), Stephen MacNeil wrote:
> Thanks Harm :)
>
> just a note on your comment
>
> >>It's not hard to get and use a devel-version ;)
> >>I can't recommend to grab the code and patch v2.18.2 with it...
>
> Well it depends on your operating system! I would say
On Tue 21 Jun 2016 at 14:55:42 (-0700), BGM wrote:
> Hi, all, I'm having trouble placing a chorus line.
> If I put the chorus in one \score and the verses in another \score, then
> they display correctly, but I can't get the midi for both scores as one
> file.
>
> It should have the entire chorus
On Tue 21 Jun 2016 at 14:53:08 (+0200), Jonathan Scholbach wrote:
> At your other point: Well, I agree that the usage of the desired
> \accidentalStyle can be a matter of discussion. But it is a very common
> practice. And there are good arguments for using it (choirsingers often
> orientate -
On Mon 20 Jun 2016 at 00:40:08 (+0200), matpen3@gmail wrote:
> I’m preparing parts for a quite complex score, and I’m using the ‘’\add
> quote” command for cues.
Why aren't you using cues rather than quotes?
> Everything is fine until I have to quote a part that contains a cue of the
> same
On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 04:04:04 (-0400), Andrew Bernard wrote:
[...]
> programming error: Grob direction requested while calculation in progress.
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> and the second flageolet does not render.
>
> While I am sure this is informative to some, since there is no position
On Mon 13 Jun 2016 at 19:31:00 (+0300), Svetlana Lobanova wrote:
> Dear lilypond users!
>
> I want to align syllables of two text lines one under another without any
> note staff. Below is a working snippet, which is quite good for my purpose. I
> would like to gain some more control on layout:
On Sun 12 Jun 2016 at 23:51:43 (-0400), Joshua Nichols wrote:
> >
> For the opening height:
> >
> \override Hairpin.height = 2
>
> This is great...
>
> > For the length if it?s too short by default:
> > \override Hairpin.minimum-length = 10
>
> This not the answer I'm looking
On Sat 11 Jun 2016 at 21:32:09 (+), Mike wrote:
> Update: I have tried to build the latest tar on my system, but I got the
> following errors - interestingly all to do with symlinks:
>
> 70: extrac07.at:27 extracting symlinks to a read-only dir
> extract extract07 read-only
On Sat 11 Jun 2016 at 12:47:40 (+), Mike wrote:
> > > > When you run LP, it will ask gs to convert the file. However, which
> > > > version of gs runs, LP's or the system's? Will it be happy running
> > > > with LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home1/myusername/lilypond/usr/lib"?
> > >
> > > No, same error
On Sun 12 Jun 2016 at 11:00:13 (+), Christian wrote:
> I am trying to make a reverted score (white music on black background).
> The first part works, the second doesn't.
> Does anybody know how to make the background black?
Displaying the PDF in reverse-video is not sufficient, I assume.
On Thu 09 Jun 2016 at 07:34:46 (+), Mike wrote:
> > When you run LP, it will ask gs to convert the file. However, which
> > version of gs runs, LP's or the system's? Will it be happy running
> > with LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home1/myusername/lilypond/usr/lib"?
>
> No, same error I'm afraid.
"No"
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 20:59:17 (+), Mike wrote:
> > This sort of error is usually a good sign that you're trying to run a
> > locally installed LP with the Linux Distribution versions of, eg,
> > GhostScript or Python; not a good idea.
> >
> > Your full output of the installation process (in
On Wed 08 Jun 2016 at 20:33:51 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
> Suppose something like
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
>c4 c4(
> }
> \alternative {
> {c4) r}
> {c2) } %%% this
> }
>
> the second end slur is not typeset.
> is there any elegant way to draw it, or i should try to make an
>
Just a quick note before I go off to do real work...
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 07:49:41 (+), Mike wrote:
> > > [~]# bash lilypond_install/lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh --prefix lilypond
> >
> > I can't understand this. It looks like root's prompt, not a user's.
>
> It's just my user's
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 09:54:35 (+), Mike wrote:
> > I'll try a hello world now.
>
> Uhm... Hello world is having trouble with ps->pdf, so far as I can see.
> Again, executing that command manually worked fine, and the resulting PDF
> looks good.
> Should I start a new thread?
>
> Thanks
>
>
On Sat 04 Jun 2016 at 20:30:08 (+), Mike wrote:
> > First cd to your home directory. Then issue the command:
> >
> > bash path/to/lilypond-2.19.42-1.linux-x86.sh --prefix lilypond-2.19.42.1
>
> Thank you so much for trying to help, but unfortunately I'm getting the same
> errors, after
On Sat 04 Jun 2016 at 18:38:33 (+), Mike wrote:
>
> tar: ./usr/lib/libltdl.so: Cannot create symlink to `libltdl.so.7.2.0':
> Permission denied
>
> If it weren't for that "./", I would have interpreted the above as trying to
> create a symlink in /usr/lib (where I cannot do it) linking into
On Thu 02 Jun 2016 at 21:14:17 (-0400), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> I have a two stave piece using a PianoStaff. In some sections I need to
> hide the unused lower stave for a number of bars. Using \RemoveEmptyStaves
> or \RemoveAllmptyStaves does nothing. There are only spacer rests in the
> staff in
On Sun 29 May 2016 at 11:00:11 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> >> \version "2.19.40"
> >> {
> >> <> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {c' d' e' f'} <> \!
> >> }
> >> \addlyrics { \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } }
> >>
> >> {
> >> s1*0 \p \< \repeat
My last contribution to this thread.
On Thu 26 May 2016 at 18:34:44 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> The main thing that is irritating about this exchange
> is that you seem invested in maintaining low-quality documentation.
>
> What is your motivation for that?
>
> I'm trying to help
On Thu 26 May 2016 at 00:31:59 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> > > I would say that, on the contrary, \tweak and \override are not
> > documented.
> > > At least, not well enough to be useful for use with slurs.
> > >
> > > In the case of slurs, searching for "lilypond slurs tweak", the
On Tue 24 May 2016 at 17:15:59 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> > > It seems like the state of the art is to tweak each slur individually
> > > using \shape to specify displacements from current control points.
> >
> > \shape is a very nice tool.
> > This advantage inherits a
I printed and processed the pot of coffee for myself, and thought I
might as well put it into these archives.
I added the overlooked lyric alignment, changed the hyphenation (most
disappears) and removed the indentation. Ragged right closes up the
syllables. In any case, I've always printed
On Tue 17 May 2016 at 21:01:55 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Hi Rudi,
>
> This seems very interesting to me. What period is this notation from? I
> myself have never seen it before. Do you have further examples? Is it
> important for your purposes to have the solid line? There are many forms
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 08:43:12 (-0700), Knute Snortum wrote:
> My situation is this: I have two \score sections and at the end of the
> first I want to alert the reader that the next staff will have a time
> signature change. Lilypond does this for me perfectly within a score but
> between two
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 12:31:19 (-0400), Paul wrote:
>
> But I've now got it working. I noticed that I now have a ~/bin
> directory with "lilypond" and other shell scripts in it. And
> everything works fine when I do:
>
> $ ~/bin/lilypond test.ly
>
> or just
>
> $ lilypond test.ly
Those are
After the pause (for want of a better word) in receiving list emails
by eggs.gnu.org, I received a number of near-duplicate postings that
had been held up. One of them was a posting with the subject line
Subject: magnifyStaff bug?
which was written before but, like a Beethoven Piano Concerto,
was
On Sat 14 May 2016 at 15:34:30 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
> It seems that \pageBreak is not honored by Lilypond.
> I found an old post [1] that seems to state that it is needed to
> enclose each portion in a different \book block (?).
>
> Can anybody confirm? Or explain the better way to
On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote:
> Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to output the
> result ?
It's still rolled up:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.36
Processing `rol.ly'
Parsing...
(make-music
'SequentialMusic
'elements
(list (make-music
On Sat 14 May 2016 at 23:54:17 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Well, despite that I think this is an absolutely terrible hack, exporting to
> midi and importing it back produces more or less what you want, with a lot of
> editing. Works on 2.19.41 on openSUSE Leap 42.1 linux.
>
> Still
On Thu 12 May 2016 at 16:45:23 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 10/05/2016 01:05, David Wright wrote:
> >On Mon 09 May 2016 at 16:52:44 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> >Reading the manual saves you having to remember everything.
> >Read 3.2 Titles and headers.
>
>
On Tue 10 May 2016 at 12:45:38 (-0400), Stephen MacNeil wrote:
> >>Thank you very much. It's close, but will need a little tweaking. Your
> >>example
> is right-justified against the left margin, whereas I want it >>starting at
> the left margin, and pushing the staff to the right
>
> remove
On Tue 10 May 2016 at 13:21:36 (+0200), Davide Liessi wrote:
> In the following code, the two short instrument names "A" and "B" of
> the second system are put one on top of the other (as I expected).
> I can solve the collision manually, e.g. with something similar to the
> three commented lines.
On Mon 09 May 2016 at 16:52:44 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 08/05/16 21:30, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 08 May 2016 at 19:06:27 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> >> Basically, I want to do pretty much what "instrument name" does in a
> >> score - I want to
On Mon 09 May 2016 at 14:35:17 (-0400), Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
> I have been wwriting A LOT of four-hand music, and I agree in
> principle with most of what I have read in this thread. Even so, I
> thought to chime in with my approach.
I bow to your experience...
> In my experience, I have found
On Mon 09 May 2016 at 14:28:41 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > [...] use tag groups.
>
> (1) Thank you David, I didn't see this command (tagGroup)
> (2) Very useful and interesting 'command'. If you use tags this is an
> almost mandatory
On Sat 07 May 2016 at 10:42:43 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> Dear David thank you for explaining the problem and pointing me out
> the documentation where this is discussed.
>
> Yes, I could organize my code differently but this would be less
> clear. Try to have a look to the attached image
On Sun 08 May 2016 at 19:13:37 (+0200), Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote:
> Would dynamics parts dedicated to breaks and pageBreaks, stored in variables,
> be useful? They might contain only spacer rests and such breaks, and be used
> by Piano I and Piano II parts.
>
> I use this satisfactorily to
On Sun 08 May 2016 at 19:06:27 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> Basically, I want to do pretty much what "instrument name" does in a
> score - I want to put the name of the section in front of the start
> of the staff. The problem is, as always, when you use a feature for
> what it's not intended
On Fri 06 May 2016 at 10:02:20 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> I thought that
>
> \keepWithTag #'(A B) \music
>
> and
>
> \keepWithTag #'A {\keepWithTag #'B \music}
>
> would be equivalent. But according to the following test it doesn't.
>
> 1 Could you please confirm they are not the
On Fri 06 May 2016 at 15:08:30 (+), Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 5/5/16 8:13 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote:
> >> On May 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >> On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In my experience, all are
On Thu 05 May 2016 at 11:26:17 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> > This thread is dying a quick death. I have raised this issue with the
> > nonsensical digest attachments several times in the last several years.
> > Those threads also died a quick death. I wonder how many get the
On Fri 06 May 2016 at 00:05:03 (+), Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" <pck...@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:21:28 -0500
> >> From: David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>
&
On Wed 04 May 2016 at 21:00:22 (-0500), Cynthia Karl wrote:
>
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:21:28 -0500
> > From: David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>
> > To: Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com>
> > Subject: Re: attac
On Fri 06 May 2016 at 01:14:11 (+0200), Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-05-06 0:34 GMT+02:00 Ryan Michael :
> > Forgive me. The error is:
> >
> > lilypond/current/scm/stencil.scm:779:26: Wrong type argument in position 1:
> > #f
> >
> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Simon
On Thu 05 May 2016 at 13:57:33 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> David Nalesnik and various others I think have written scheme to allow you to
> skip a range of numbers when page numbering, or to give a direct list of page
> numbers to be used. I want to be able to specify something like this
On Sun 01 May 2016 at 23:04:05 (+), Joseph Chrestien wrote:
> > Yes, see this thread in the german forum
> > http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php?topic=2087.0
> discussed are different possibilities:
>
> > (1) python from within a lilyfile.ly:
>
> Yay, it works! I have "Hello world" in the
On Tue 26 Apr 2016 at 01:21:00 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote:
> > But I see you've now acknowledged (indirectly) that LP can set
> > multiple marks at the same point after stating that it can't.
> > Are there other things that LP can be p
On Thu 28 Apr 2016 at 13:56:03 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 27/04/2016 01:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >On 4/26/16 3:56 PM, "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>2016-04-26 2:21 GMT+02:00 Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk&g
On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 10:38:55 (+0200), Malte Meyn wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> >But it's no surprise that composing directly into LP is only really
> >possible in absolute mode.
>
> It’s not. I’ve always done it in \relative mode using octave chec
On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 09:22:14 (+0200), Noeck wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> > it would be great
> > if it could convert into a canonical style, where canonical could be
> > defined in ways such as: every note with pitch duration (or
> > even pi
On Fri 29 Apr 2016 at 17:52:16 (-0300), Caio Giovaneti de Barros wrote:
>
> On 4/29/16 7:27 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
> >>About a year ago, Kieren indicated that he has decided to go completely
> >>absolute mode, even to the point
> >>of redoing his historic code:
> >>
>
On Fri 29 Apr 2016 at 17:05:05 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> I will note, however, that the suggestions about using images or
> attachments don't seem to work with the list in digest mode.
>
> Choosing an example from the latest digest, the attachment link yeilds a
> 404 error.
>
>
ple up about the format of emails and people's grammar and
> spelling than answer the damn question.
> On 27 Apr 2016, "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Although I started this thread, it was purely because David Wright had
> > mentioned the dif
On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 19:18:01 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 24/04/2016 03:13, David Wright wrote:
> >On Sat 23 Apr 2016 at 11:25:05 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> >>On 22/04/16 19:36, David Wright wrote:
> >>>On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists
On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 10:55:39 (+0200), m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote:
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[-- Type: text/html, Encoding: base64, Size: 4.7K --]
[-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
Please configure your client to post a text equivalent of your HTML code.
Cheers,
On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 10:00:38 (+0200), Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 24.04.2016 um 09:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > Noeck writes:
> >>> So how do you define "the default"
> >> As written before: What ships with the default installation.
> >
> > So python3 needs to be invoked using
On Sat 23 Apr 2016 at 22:09:55 (+0200), Noeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> print 'foo' vs. print('foo') is usually the most frequent difference and
> writing code for a 'common subset' in most cases requires at least some
> from __future__ imports to ensure compatibility.
All my programs converted perfectly
On Sat 23 Apr 2016 at 11:25:05 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 22/04/16 19:36, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> >> On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> >>> David K wrote:
> >>>>>
On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> >David K wrote:
> >>>Hm? How could you even have a compressed multi-measure rest when there
> >>>is anything like an "8-bar phrase" in parallel?
> >>>That sounds like a problem that
On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 16:24:06 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 22/04/2016 14:49, Paul Scott wrote:
> >>I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest happens
> >>>in the part, not in the full score — but one wants not to have to use
> >>>multiple \tag constructs just to
On Tue 19 Apr 2016 at 19:38:14 (+0100), David Sumbler wrote:
> So at the risk of embarrassing myself, I should be grateful if somebody
> would explain the following: how does Lilypond recognize the end of a
> variable definition?
Oversimplifying, there are about four things you can define with a
On Tue 19 Apr 2016 at 13:22:50 (+0200), Stephan Neuhaus wrote:
> On 2016-04-18 20:29, David Wright wrote:
> >That begs the question. How do you define "clearly malformed input."
> >If it is malformed, it can't be clear.
> >
> >Of course, if you mea
On Mon 18 Apr 2016 at 09:06:47 (+0200), Stephan Neuhaus wrote:
> On 2016-04-17 13:51, Urs Liska wrote:
> >Am 17.04.2016 um 04:29 schrieb David Wright:
> >>I think a better analogy than compilers writing programs would be
> >>browsers rendering web pages. Can you im
On Mon 18 Apr 2016 at 03:23:31 (-0500), msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Sharon Rosner wrote:
> > I’m not saying that lilypond’s behaviour is necessarily wrong. I’m just
> > trying to point out, like others have, that the term “fatal error” would
> > normally mean that the
On Mon 18 Apr 2016 at 14:59:14 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:02:30 +0200
> David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > I recommend taking a look at \resetRelativeOctave instead. If you write
> >
> > \resetRelativeOctave a''
>
> Why is that reset, and not set? You either
On Fri 15 Apr 2016 at 10:23:55 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "David Kastrup"
> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 8:04 AM
> >> Simon Albrecht writes:
> >>> On 15.04.2016
Please can you quote in a way that's visible in text clients,
not just HTML ones.
On Sat 16 Apr 2016 at 20:42:45 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> I have not used any language of complaint, merely observation and puzzlement.
> It was also not I that mentioned it is a regular source of confusion.
On Thu 14 Apr 2016 at 11:20:08 (+0100), Phil Holmes wrote:
> From: "mj"
> >Is it possible to lyric text on a rest? (it auto-skips, now)
> >
> >I'm using \addlyrics { \words }, and there is a quarter rest that
> >needs a word, just like all the other notes. Is that possible?
>
On Sat 09 Apr 2016 at 02:34:22 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> How I should structure the lilypond source code in this case where the
> visual structure and the musical structure does not match? For the music
> structure I would like to create the variable fragment, but for the visual
>
On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 14:04:21 (+0100), Richard Shann wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 07:40 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 09:40:30 (+0100), Richard Shann wrote:
> > [...]
> > > style, but something like that with no church rests, numerical time
> &g
On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 09:40:30 (+0100), Richard Shann wrote:
[...]
> style, but something like that with no church rests, numerical time
What are these? Misericords?
Cheers,
David.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Fri 08 Apr 2016 at 01:43:01 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> tyronicus writes:
> > David Kastrup wrote
> >> LilyPond will not make use of a graphics card. Indeed, for a single
> >> score, LilyPond will not make use of more than a single CPU core.
> >
> > After Lily
On Tue 05 Apr 2016 at 22:16:40 (-0400), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 9:58 PM, Martin Neubauer wrote:
> > I was wondering how often the odd half measure beam really leads to
> > ambiguity between 3/4 and 6/8 time in properly typeset music.
Apart
On Wed 06 Apr 2016 at 13:34:01 (+0200), Martin Neubauer wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 13:23, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > > when I explored the effect of that setting, I wasn't sure the outcome is
> > really that desirable
> >
> > Wait… is your
On Mon 04 Apr 2016 at 17:47:03 (+), Joseph Chrestien wrote:
> Thanks David and Simon for your kind help. I used David's solution and it
> works brilliantly. Very nice. I didn't know of this NullVoice context, I'll
> take a look at it.
My view would be to use David's solution where you have
On Tue 05 Apr 2016 at 01:04:40 (+0200), Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-04-04 23:58 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler :
> >
> > Just a thought - perhaps one day somebody who understands Lilypond well
> > might write a section for the docs, starting with the basic
>
> Well, the full quote:
>
On Mon 04 Apr 2016 at 23:30:00 (+0200), Sharon Rosner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m getting a bunch of "programming error: insane spring distance requested,
> ignoring it” etc errors when compiling the following:
>
> \version "2.19.37"
>
> music = \relative c' {
> c1 d e f \bar "||"
> \set
On Mon 04 Apr 2016 at 12:46:37 (+0200), Bernard wrote:
> On 03-04-16 22:56, David Kastrup wrote:
> >Bernard writes:
> >>That does help. I found out \with is a very special statement.
> >Not really. \with can be part of other constructs, just like "else" can
> >be part
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:53:13 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 19:30 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Henry Law writes:
> >
> > > 3. On 28/03/16 13:05, Christoph Friedrich wrote:
> > >> refrain-empty = \lyricmode {
> > >> " " " " " " " " " " " "
> > >> }
> >
On Sat 26 Mar 2016 at 23:23:51 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> Very sorry David and Robert my example was not at all clear.
>
> I have a long lilypond source that is shifted of three sixteenth note (the
> file has been generated using the midi to lilypond conversion tool).
Well, I did wonder
On Sat 26 Mar 2016 at 01:06:58 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any automatic tool to shift some lilypond music of a certain
> rhythm amount? For instance consider the following fragment:
>
> \time 2/4
> r4 a4 ~ |
> a4 b4 ~|
> b4 r4
>
>
> How can I shift (convert) it to:
>
On Mon 21 Mar 2016 at 10:53:59 (-0400), Joseph N. Srednicki wrote:
> I found the snippet that shows how to change symbol for the \breathe
> command. See http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=195
>
> Can someone tell me how to change the script value to a straight tick,
> similar to the straight
On Fri 18 Mar 2016 at 16:42:45 (-0400), Benjamin Strecker wrote:
> I was a little curious about the difference in the output, but I'm afraid I
> can't offer a solution, only some observations after looking at it.
>
> In my tinkering, it seemed to be associated with the time signature. In
> the
On Thu 10 Mar 2016 at 10:19:29 (-0600), Cynthia Karl wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:04:57 -0700 (MST) tisimst
> schrieb:
> >
> > HTH,
> > Abraham
> >
> > P.S. Some of the power users on this list filter inline images, so if you
> > wouldn't mind making the image an
901 - 1000 of 1132 matches
Mail list logo