Hi List --
One of my several \tempo commands is printing its line too far above the
staff.
My attempts to affect its Y-offset (with \markup, \offset or \tweak)
have failed.
Could someone please point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance,
Peter A
Dear LP Gurus,
My piano score in progress has 3 voices. As these voices are to become
somewhat conflated, I've assigned each a unique color for its noteheads,
stems, flags, and slurs. All of this works fine.
However, I can't find a way to change color default for its
ARTICULATIONS (the
My apologies, Simon. Just now registered your first request.
Will reform.
On 12/05/2016 03:42 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
I don’t understand why you keep going off-list with this.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On 12/04/2016 11:50 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
...
Until I reread the manual I had forgotten that spacer rests are really
called "invisible rests", which exactly describes what they do. Perhaps
we should change the documentation to have most of the text read
"invisible rest".
Well, to my mind,
Hear hear!
P
On 12/03/2016 10:19 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi all,
Or perhaps have a distinction between things like { s4 } and { c4\rest } ?
I think we should distinguish between “skips” [which take up no space,
horizontal or vertical], “spacers” [which take up space, but are
On 12/03/2016 06:26 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes:
On 03.12.2016 02:36, PMA wrote:
The score setup already calls for proportional
notation.
I think it would be a valid request to have s-rests take up the
respective space with proportional s
On 12/02/2016 08:36 PM, PMA wrote:
On 12/02/2016 07:08 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 02.12.2016 23:39, PMA wrote:
Hi All!
I notice that the spacer command (e.g., "s4"), though
always accounting rightly for the TIME it commandeers
(here a quarter-note's worth), does not always ins
On 12/02/2016 07:08 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 02.12.2016 23:39, PMA wrote:
Hi All!
I notice that the spacer command (e.g., "s4"), though
always accounting rightly for the TIME it commandeers
(here a quarter-note's worth), does not always insert
ACTUAL HORIZONTAL SPACE in the score
Oops. Ignore the Subject line here, and the whole
lower message. I forgot to erase them. Mea culpa!
On 12/02/2016 05:39 PM, PMA wrote:
Hi All!
I notice that the spacer command (e.g., "s4"), though
always accounting rightly for the TIME it commandeers
(here a quarter-note's wo
would have disabled it?)
Thanks,
Pete
On 11/03/2016 03:41 PM, PMA wrote:
Hi LP Gurus!
I have a score (see "Original" below) full of note events
like "gs 3", whose duration is MEANT always to be realized
as *one triplet half-note*.
Original = { gs 3 a 3g 2 a
Hi LP Gurus!
I have a score (see "Original" below) full of note events
like "gs 3", whose duration is MEANT always to be realized
as *one triplet half-note*.
Original = { gs 3 a 3g 2 a 3 }
Replaced = { \TR gs\TR a g 2 \TR a }
So, I'm trying to concoct a function
Hi All again!
I would like to alter the output of LY's \tempo command,
specifically within its "( = )"
assignment.
Here's my original --
\tempo \markup \sans "Blah blah" 1 = 50
which o'course outputs a black whole-note glyph with both
the "= 50" and the parentheses in TimesRoman font.
I want
Oh dear. *NEVER MIND*. I just now got it working.
Thanks anyway!
Pete
On 09/20/2016 01:12 PM, PMA wrote:
Hi Lilypond Gurus!
I need help, when you can spare the time, to get an already-
working Lilypond music function to call my just-added Scheme
routine.
This Scheme procedure works when
Hi Lilypond Gurus!
I need help, when you can spare the time, to get an already-
working Lilypond music function to call my just-added Scheme
routine.
This Scheme procedure works when called directly from Guile:
entering "(colorNote -1)" get output "red".
(define
Hear, hear!
Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely for original
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely for original
compositions
PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely for original
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely for original compositions
Trevor Daniels wrote:
... in the Learning Manual:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
Should the LH upper 'D' not be an E-flat?
- PMA
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Michael Gerdau wrote:
Anybody remembering APL ?
APL was my main lang. for decades,
as is now its superset/descendant, J.
I've got weary trying to tell anybody
why. But the curious might take a
peek at
http://www.jsoftware.com/
Pete
___
Andrew Bernard wrote:
Greetings All,
Since immutable as an adjective applied to an object in most programming
languages, and in normal English usage means unchanging over time, or unable to
be changed, how is it that the value of immutable objects can then be changed
with \override and
Joram wrote:
Hi Pete,
Will pursue -- hope the \shapell fussing doesn't carry me away
To avoid frustration: The command is \shapeII with two upper case I’s
(like in Iceland) and not \shapell with lower case l’s (like in low).
Cheers,
Joram
O!
(Thanks,
Hi List.
I have in piano staff a 6/8 bar of single 8ths, with the
first three in bass clef and the second three in treble.
I'd like all six notes under _one_ slur (whether snaky-
shaped or not).
Is this somehow feasible? Thanks in advance for any
thoughts.
Pete
tisimst wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n17817...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Am 25.06.2015 um 00:34 schrieb PMA:
Hi List.
I have in piano staff a 6/8 bar of single 8ths, with the
first three in bass clef and the second three in treble.
I'd
Abraham,
Why do you point to Haydn's Hob. XVI:37? Is it that Peters'
(Köhler Ed.) handling of this particular work was especially
remarkable -- and so has specifically inspired your font?
- Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
tisimst wrote:
Peter,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:57 AM, PMA-2 [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n17571...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Which Haydn Sonata is this?
- Pete
Keyboard Sonata in D major, Hob. XVI:37 No. 50 (Joseph Haydn)
Here's the IMSLP link
http://imslp.org/wiki
Hi List.
I need to lie to Lily about an end-of-page time signature change.
So that even tho she means to tick on in 3/4, she will now _say_
6/8 instead -- for a new belated 6/8 page I want to stick in.
Is there a convenient trick for doing this? (If not, nevermind, I'm
just trying to avoid the
Which Haydn Sonata is this?
- Pete
tisimst wrote
All Haydn users,
I just discovered that I had a little bug in the font that messes up the
spacing when using the \tied-lyric markup function (i.e., it introduced
too
much space between the tied text). This has been fixed and an updated set
of
On the piano I can play/think in voices or not.
Sorry, I've lost track as to who wrote that.
But just in case -- one might consider the
(single-musician) pianist accompanying a
(4-voiced) sunday school hymn.
Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Calixte Faure wrote:
I learned music in French (native French) and was at the beginning a little
bit confused with 2 4 8 16 etc. because we say white, black, hooked,
double-hooked, triple-, etc. .
At least you weren't trapped in hemi-demi-semi-quavers!
- Pete
Am 22.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
We try to explain this away by saying that LP is an engraving tool,
not a composition tool, but -- if we're really serious about making LP
more attractive to the average user of notation software, this is
too glib.
In using LilyPond for all my
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Pete,
So major compositional changes -- the ones we're
calling structural here -- are implemented at that
first (gen.purp.prog.lang) level, tossing LP not much
to trip over then or fail to carry through.
My point, then: Why stuff a complicated-enough
engraving
Andrew Bernard wrote:
Yes, it is quite muddy!
I just took a look at the Guile 2.0 reference manual. Generally they use
procedure but the book also uses the term function interchangeably further on
inside, so I suppose it does not matter so much! No doubt the book is written
by a large team
Wols Lists wrote:
On 18/04/15 22:11, PMA wrote:
Aha. So the improper-er their code got, the tougher time
compilers had trying to -- as Martin says -- throw it out.
All told, is there now any real need _not_ to use the terms
function and procedure interchangeably? That is, any
real need
/lilypond-user
Hi List --
AFAIK, of our major ancestor languages, only Pascal insisted on a
literal working
function-vs-procedure distinction. Did Wirth ever defend this insistence
(as more
than a track-keeping enforcer re value-outputting vs
non-value-outputting code)?
PMA
J Martin Rushton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/04/15 20:41, PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the «
sub-programs » that return a value and those that don’t, but
the Scheme docs seem to use
Wols Lists wrote:
On 18/04/15 19:56, PMA wrote:
AFAIK, of our major ancestor languages, only Pascal insisted on a
literal working
function-vs-procedure distinction. Did Wirth ever defend this insistence
(as more
than a track-keeping enforcer re value-outputting vs
non-value-outputting code
PMA wrote:
Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello,
Yes, historically a disctinction was made between the « sub-programs »
that return a value and those that don’t, but the Scheme docs seem to
use the terms function and procedure interchangeably.
In C++, everything is a function : a procedure is merely
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
You can have the pedal line be a line drawing of Grumpy Cat if you
want. ;)
As a 6-year-old budding pianist I thought, seriously,
that the Ped. must be a cocker spaniel. (Our best
friends had one.) If I had to read this as a pedalling
direction, well, fair enough.
Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Peter,
how about a tiny example ?
Cheers,
Pierre
Hi Pierre,
Ok, I'll whittle down a big one (to remove home-grown
non-culprit conditions you'd otherwise have to wonder
about) and send the still-botching Tiny.
All I want, really, is a command that says to the
PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Abraham Lee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Pete,
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too big.
This was not so in the original version (2.12.3), but is
now after my upgrade to version
Hi List.
I have a \cadenzaOn score with many notes, occasional rests,
and no barlines. I want beaming imposed for all consecutive
(flagged) notes, interruptible only by rests.
That was LP 2.12's default auto-beam behavior, but 2.18 in
this context (tho with \set Staff.autoBeaming = ##t) only
Hi List.
An *.ly of mine has four 1-system \score's on each page,
rather than one 4-system \score, because each system's
Score.proportionalNotationDuration...make-moment...
setting is different (and \score accepts only one such
setting).
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too
P.S. I should ask alternatively: Is there a way that
proportionalNotationDuration...make-moment...
can be reset _per system_ (assuming now a multi-
system \score)?
PMA wrote:
Hi List.
An *.ly of mine has four 1-system \score's on each page,
rather than one 4-system \score, because each
Abraham Lee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Pete,
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too big.
This was not so in the original version (2.12.3), but is
now after my upgrade to version 2.18.2.
Is it possible to
PMA wrote:
Abraham Lee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Pete,
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too big.
This was not so in the original version (2.12.3), but is
now after my upgrade to version 2.18.2
guoguocuozuoduo wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on a piece that uses reversed and inverted clefs which indicate
retrograde and inversion.
The reversed clef is placed at the end of a line to indicate retrograde; the
inverted clef is placed before the main clef to indicate inversion.
How can
PMA wrote:
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line
Mike Solomon wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:08 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
PMA wrote:
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using
Hi List.
My Debian version is Squeeze (oldstable),
with default LilyPond at version 2.12.3-7.
Has any of you successfully upgraded LP
to version 2.18.0-1 on that system?
Thanks,
Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I'm thinking this implies that convert-ly is best used
incrementally by LP version, with no intermediate
upgrading omitted. So, with original code at Ver 'A'
and my destination Ver 'E', then for best results I'd
install Versions B, C, D and run all four convert-ly's
(A-B; B-C; C-D; D-E)?
Is
David Harm,
Thank you! I let my unresolved fuzziness on this issue
(and a memory of messy cumulative system upgrades)
keep me from attempting a 'convert-ly' _EVER_.
Now I stand -- well, sit -- corrected, and am ready to at
least _try_.
Pete
David Kastrup wrote:
Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
now there definitely seems to be something wrong with mail delivery on the list.
Agreed. I had reported similar trouble with other forums'
email, but now only LilyPond's hasn't returned to normal.
Pete
___
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line
extending
I've no idea, and don't see it as clearly a defect _of the list_.
Over the past few days I've had emails straggling in a day-
or-so late from _several_ forums.
Richard Shann wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 14:53 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
now there definitely seems to be something wrong
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line
extending distance-X from the notehead. (The space
following would indicate silence.)
But I
since?
PMA
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thomas Morley wrote:
how about:
...
#(define folio-offset '(
...
#(define-markup-command (place-folio layout props folio) (markup?)
...
\paper {
...
HTH,
Harm
Working beautifully (THd).
Thanks Harm!
Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hi List.
Most of my current score's page numbers need
shifting a little, both vertically and horizontally.
Can \override ... #'extra-offset = #'( ... . ...)
or something similar be aimed at PageNumber
(instead of, say, DynamicText) to shift them?
I could, I know, force the issue,
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-02-05 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
Hi List.
Most of my current score's page numbers need
shifting a little, both vertically and horizontally.
Can \override ... #'extra-offset = #'( ... . ...)
or something similar be aimed at PageNumber
(instead of, say,
My hack around this is to begin (each part) with
some arbitrary pitch/duration at _zero_ Velocity
(with the Rest just following, of course).
This has suited my purposes, though I expect it
might invite trouble for others.
Pete
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Eluze wrote:
Thank you, Joram!
P
Noeck wrote:
Hi all,
as promised after the release of 2.16, I update my Lilypond cheat sheets
for each stable version. After 2.18 came out recently, here is the
corresponding version of my cheat sheet in three languages:
English:
Congrats, David et al!
If I download lilypond-2.18.0-1.linux-x86.sh to
my Debian Squeeze box (hoping to make it
work there), will that file execute on its own?
In any case, will its execution disable/replace
my 2.12.3 (already happily running)?
Thanks Happy New Year
Paranoid P
David Kastrup
Tom Cloyd wrote:
PP:
As someone who is forever bewildered by Ly's download page (because no
where else am I downloading a script instead of an installation module -
I live a sheltered life!), allow me to assist:
1. On the unix download page - http://lilypond.org/unix.html - scroll
down just a
Hemiola -- per half bar, over ca 100 bars.
Urs Liska wrote:
David Kastrupd...@gnu.org schrieb:
Urs Liskau...@openlilylib.org writes:
Has anybody seen this before?
There are probably similar measures before and/or after. It's sort of
a
polyrhythm: 6 notes are one phrase starting with a
Urs Liska wrote:
Am 15.12.2013 15:19, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Exactly the other way around.
Barenreiter_organ_classical_part_landscape_legal.ly
Barenreiter is most significant, e.g. for sorting.
Actually, for me “organ” is the most significant for sorting! =)
But I appreciate your point.
Alex Loomis wrote:
If they were to use the keys like Urs suggested then internal sort order
wouldn't matter, so, to the user, it would seem like it is user-determined.
Oh -- sorry, I should have realized he was covering this.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:42 AM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu
Urs Liska wrote:
Answer him that
...
As LP input files are plain you can use _any_ programming
language to modify ... or even generate LilyPond input files.
This is a nod to Urs's word _any_. All my scores are made via LP.
But each LP input file is made by a program I've written either in J
Curt wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 2:11 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
...All my scores are made via LP.
But each LP input file is made by a program I've written either in J
(descendant superset of APL) or in good old BASH -- roughly as
far apart as programming languages get.
Ha - I'd
PMA wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Jim Long wrote:
I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0
means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs
would be engraved
Jim Long wrote:
I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0
means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs
would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and
a factor of #-1.0 would mean that the glyphs are engraved
normally, but spaced
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Jim Long wrote:
I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0
means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs
would be engraved over the top of each other in one big blob, and
a factor of #-1.0 would
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Jim Long wrote:
I suppose that, by extension, this means that a factor of #0.0
means the layout would have no spacing at all, and all glyphs
would be engraved over the
Urs Liska wrote:
Am 29.07.2013 20:04, schrieb PMA:
Urs Liska wrote:
No, these don't, but I think that fingerings in itself _do_ belong in
there, and if the original ones from Henle are copyrighted ...
It seems to me that the only fingerings
properly belonging in an Urtext ed
are those
Urs Liska wrote:
Urtext is a fiction anyway in 95% of the cases. What would you
consider Urtext when you have a manuscript, a fair copy, an original
edition controlled by the composer, a personal copy of the OE with
corrections, and another, later manuscript with other readings than the
OE or
David,
Thank you for this review. I wish I'd seen it 40 yrs ago,
when a latest LISP book -- showcasing recursion as an
iterator(?!) -- led me to throw my lot with APL instead.
Music-programming-wise, of course, the joke's on me,
as so relatively few computing musicians went this way.
Pete
...
Let's say the rule is as follows: anything that is a valid and
interesting blog post will be accepted. So you just have to wrap the
information you want to give into a blogpost form.
For example, imagine that you want to announce Lily 2.17.1 release.
Instead of writing something like:
LilyGilder[ok, nevermind]
SoundsFromSound wrote:
Across The Pond
From Across The Pond
Across the LilyPond
From Across The (Lily)Pond
etc
...just brainstorming.
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
Urs Liska wrote:
Hi,
there is a free online course starting on Coursera.org, dealing with
Introduction to Systematic Program Design:
https://www.coursera.org/course/programdesign
It is primarily intended for people without prior programming
experience, but is said to be valuable for people who
PMA wrote:
Urs Liska wrote:
Hi,
there is a free online course starting on Coursera.org, dealing with
Introduction to Systematic Program Design:
https://www.coursera.org/course/programdesign
It is primarily intended for people without prior programming
experience, but is said to be valuable
luis jure wrote:
on 2013-05-21 at 13:18 David Kastrup wrote:
It would seem that you associate the term pitch with physical
frequency.
no, it's not me, it's the standard meaning of the term as used in music
theory, psychoacoustics, musical acoustics, music cognition, and all the
disciplines
David Kastrup wrote:
It's not as much a matter of being correct, but rather of how this term
is employed within LilyPond and its documentation. LilyPond also uses
event in a meaning that contrary to common usage does not include
birthday celebrations.
Event, of course, has been in common
I've had the same experience (short of realizing).
Pete
Dr. med. Kai Lautenschläger wrote:
Hello List,
I just want to let you know, that I continue to be _very_ thankful for all the
great ideas, patient explanations and profound help I draw from this list! The
amount of time most of you
bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
An optimist believes that we are living in the best of all conceivable
worlds. A pessimist _knows_ it.
--
David Kastrup
NICE!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Peter,
An optimist believes that we are living in the best of all conceivable
worlds. A pessimist _knows_ it.
Yes! Got me wondering -- How might one fit
the realist in here (without loss of pithitude)?
I thought the same thing… What I came up with is this:
An
PMA wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Peter,
An optimist believes that we are living in the best of all conceivable
worlds. A pessimist _knows_ it.
Yes! Got me wondering -- How might one fit
the realist in here (without loss of pithitude)?
I thought the same thing… What I came up
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
David David,
Thank you Both!
I'm using the one-param version, as in this score my X Y offsets
always match.
But on exec -- uh oh -- Scheme is yelling:
string:2:65: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning
Hi List.
I would like to alter this function...
glissmove = {
\once \override Glissando #'(bound-details left Y) = #1.3
\once \override Glissando #'(bound-details right Y) = #1.3
}
to accept its 1.3 or whatever as an input parameter instead.
I see docs on parameterizing Scheme functions,
David David,
Thank you Both!
I'm using the one-param version, as in this score my X Y offsets
always match.
But on exec -- uh oh -- Scheme is yelling:
string:2:65: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning here
\once \override Glissando #(quote (bound-details
You're right, man: working dory-hunky!
I promise to upgrade *BTWN* projects.
Thanks again,
Pete
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
David David,
Thank you Both!
I'm using the one-param version, as in this score my X Y
Keith OHara wrote:
Knut PetersenKnut_Petersenat t-online.de writes:
Have a look at the attached source and the png, the problem is obvious.
The first appearance dictates which of the two enharmonic equivalents is
chosen for the ambitus.
Yes. The ambitus was formerly sorted in
FYI --
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Acma-l] Sibelius ProTools . . . Woes?
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:07:28 +0930
From: Robert Pawel Wolf robert.w...@adelaide.edu.au
To: Kevin Austin kevin.aus...@videotron.ca
CC: electroacoust...@concordia.ca, cec-confere...@googlegroups.com,
Dr. med. Kai Lautenschläger wrote:
Hi List,
is there any way to make lilypond shift the visible contents on a page to the
_outer_ edge? It would be something like horizontal-shift, while that command
within the \paper-block seems to shift the content to the right on _all_ pages
(meaning even
Interesting! I do like these styles (per-system or
continuous-line) for Mike's and Jay's audio entries.
My audios, though, will be long -- Franck, Busoni,
etc. -- and may, if displaying only very local score
views at a time, hide the forrest for the trees.
I'll experiment to see, probably, how
Hi List.
I'm planning similar YouTube entries, i.e., music
performances sync'd with their score-page turns.
But this will be a first for me, and I see a hefty
bunch of (Linux) softwares for video editing.
If any of you has a favorite among those options
(or among how-to docs), I'd appreciate
Re: complement? --
This would depend on Why he'd have had kittens,
and that in turn on whether he'd 'gotten' the joke.
We couldn't tell whether he was amused or, you
know, merely devastated.
P
Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:59 AM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Indeed, Valentin! Our chiwawa JSB lives for that
report and, seeing your joke, nearly had kittens.
Janek Warchoł wrote:
Valentin, you sneaky bastard! Tried to deceive us, huh? But i see
the new LilyPond Report announced on Lily website, mwahahahaha!
Hi List. Please forgive a naive question.
Is there such a thing as a WAV-to-MIDI
or MP3-to-MIDI file format converter?
My common sense is yelling, No way,
Buster!, but it needs confirmation.
Thanks in advance,
P
___
lilypond-user mailing list
I sit flamboozled! Thanks, will look into this!
(Yes, my system is Linux -- Debian Squeeze.)
Brett McCoy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:23 AM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Hi List. Please forgive a naive question.
Is there such a thing as a WAV-to-MIDI
or MP3-to-MIDI file format
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
