Am 20. Mai 2017 18:53:54 MESZ schrieb David Wright :
>On Sat 20 May 2017 at 18:26:40 (+0200), Jean Brefort wrote:
>> Le samedi 20 mai 2017 à 11:18 -0500, David Wright a écrit :
>> > Stable has more than one meaning. 2.18.2 has been stable for a long
>> > time, and
On Sat 20 May 2017 at 18:26:40 (+0200), Jean Brefort wrote:
> Le samedi 20 mai 2017 à 11:18 -0500, David Wright a écrit :
> > Stable has more than one meaning. 2.18.2 has been stable for a long
> > time, and promises to be around a lot longer seeing that Debian's
> > "stretch" (as yet unreleased)
Le samedi 20 mai 2017 à 11:18 -0500, David Wright a écrit :
> Stable has more than one meaning. 2.18.2 has been stable for a long
> time, and promises to be around a lot longer seeing that Debian's
> "stretch" (as yet unreleased) still includes it.
Debian Stretch currently does not include any
On Sat 20 May 2017 at 18:38:24 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> I have used the development versions full time 8 hours plus a day for the
> last few years, with only two trivial crashing bugs, on massively complex
> scores.
Stable has more than one meaning. 2.18.2 has been stable for a long
time,
Ok I have made this experience, e.g. the grace-problem. Sometimes it seemed
to me that I stumbled over every known Lilypond-bug ;-) and blamed it on me.
As a newbie you think it is your fault, that does not depend on the
Lilypond-Version. On the other hand you learn much about using Lilypond.
Hi Robin,
Would't it be great if instead of saying 'failed(1)' we could have a
message saying 'unable to write to output file - file locked'. Especially
since newbies are not generally able to read and remember all the details
in the references, even though these may be obvious to old hands.
William Zeitler wrote:
It fails to compile:
Processing `C:/Users/william/Documents/Untitled.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
Layout output to `Untitled.ps'...
Converting
Hi Richard,
I have used the development versions full time 8 hours plus a day for the
last few years, with only two trivial crashing bugs, on massively complex
scores. Here the OP is using the so called stable version and it has
crashed straight up.
Andrew
On 20 May 2017 at 18:11, Richard
On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 10:05 +0200, Manuela Gößnitzer wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
> well, I think the Lilypond-Homepage should be updated so that the
> latest "developer"-version is strongly recommanded. Compiling a
> sourcefile is a batchjob, so where is the harm done when it crashes?
>
The harm
Hi Manuela,
The emphasis in my mail was on 7, not Windows. I wonder if there is an
incompatibility with ghostscript and Windows 7, that being rather dated now?
Andrew
On 20 May 2017 at 18:05, Manuela Gößnitzer
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> well, I think the
Hi Andrew,
well, I think the Lilypond-Homepage should be updated so that the latest
"developer"-version is strongly recommanded. Compiling a sourcefile is a
batchjob, so where is the harm done when it crashes?
I use windows myself for several reasons (there is software that works on
windows
Hi Manuela,
Well I think the reason newcomers use 2.18.2 is because the download page
strongly asserts that this is the latest stable version.
More experienced users find the development versions very stable, of
course, but newcomers don't know that.
The question that arises in my mind is why
Is there any particular reason why you use 2.18 and not 2.19? Don't be
afraid of the term "unstable version", it works fine :-).
I would advise you to use Frescobaldi
http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html as editor, this is a great help
especially for new users.
Greetings
Manuela
2017-05-19
I've installed (and uninstalled/reinstalled) the current LilyPond
(2.18.2-1) on Windows 7 (with all the latest updates).
From the command line I'm compiling this example:
\version "2.18.2"
{ c' c' c' c' }
with this command:
lilypond Untitled.ly
It fails to compile:
Processing
14 matches
Mail list logo