Am 11.05.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>
> Change clefs can be recognised by the glyph name as well. You can try
> putting some sort of (display glyph-name) in the body of the
> let-expression (on the same level like the actual functionality) to find
> out more.
Ah of course. Thanks,
Am 10.05.2017 um 19:26 schrieb Noeck:
Am 10.05.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
of course you could write a callback:
Thanks Simon,
that's much better than my approach to replace the \clef command with a
\once \override or \tweak and \clef combination.
I'll figure out what the #\F means
Am 10.05.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> of course you could write a callback:
Thanks Simon,
that's much better than my approach to replace the \clef command with a
\once \override or \tweak and \clef combination.
I'll figure out what the #\F means but could someone tell me how I can
All,
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Noeck [via Lilypond] <
ml+s1069038n203034...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
> number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
> But can I affect the y position?
>
Oh, yeah. Sorry about
Am 09.05.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Joram,
does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
But can I affect the y position?
Ah! I look forward to seeing the answer.
It would be great (actually, kind of
Hi Joram,
> does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
> number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
> But can I affect the y position?
Ah! I look forward to seeing the answer.
It would be great (actually, kind of essential) if it did.
Thanks,
Kieren.
Hi,
does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
But can I affect the y position?
Best,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Abraham,
> The ClefModifier grob has a property called "clef-alignments" that handles
> this, providing individual positioning for G, F, and C clefs (you'll likely
> need to play around with the numbers a bit):
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/clefmodifier
Oh, FFS… I
Kieren,
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond] <
ml+s1069038n203018...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In Gould (p. 506), it suggests that the clef modifier for the bass clef
> should dangle from the tip of the bass clef. Lilypond does the following by
> default:
