On 27 Sep 2009, at 05:36, Graham Breed wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I recall that: LilyPond has more than
one glyph-finding model. That was a problem with the key
signatures, I think, which could not use those from external fonts.
Lilypond has one glyph-finding model for accidentals,
Dear Community,
I have now defined a table for mictotones (I use the division of 12 of the
whole tone, which is not 100 percent just intonation).
The spacing, I guess, is ok, I only get problems, sometimes, at the
beginning of a measure.
I've defined for that the variable machplatz (makespace, if
Stefan Thomas wrote:
1. The new accidentals are also played via midi, which is great. But not,
when different accidentals are in a chord. Is there a possibilitie to change
this?
Yeah, you have to split it into separate contrapuntal lines.
I've used a contraption of include files so
Hi,
A friend of mine is used to Finale. I try to convert him to lilypond.
What is the best way to convert a score from Finale to Lilypond?
Regards,
Frédéric
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Nick Payne wrote:
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second
example don't seem to match the output. The comment says No
auto-beaming is defined for 12/16, yet the output has the 16th notes
beamed in
Despite of the answers that were given
(and which normally are sufficient enough for a workaround):
can someone explain to me why lilypond still (at least sometimes)
displays stems when I
\override Stem #'length = #0?
Thanks in advance
Marc
\version 2.13.4
test = \relative c' {
c4 d
2009/9/27 Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org
Hi,
A friend of mine is used to Finale. I try to convert him to lilypond.
What is the best way to convert a score from Finale to Lilypond?
Regards,
Export the Finale score to musicXML, then run musicxml2ly on it. This script
is included with
Marc Hohl asked:
why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems
You probably haven't enabled no-stem-extend
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Frédéric == Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org writes:
Frédéric A friend of mine is used to Finale. I try to convert him
Frédéric to lilypond. What is the best way to convert a score
Frédéric from Finale to Lilypond? Regards,
What *ought* to be the best way is to have Finale save
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Laura Conrad lcon...@laymusic.org wrote:
Frédéric == Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.org writes:
Frédéric A friend of mine is used to Finale. I try to convert him
Frédéric to lilypond. What is the best way to convert a score
Frédéric from Finale to
Robin Bannister schrieb:
Marc Hohl asked:
why lilypond still (at least sometimes) displays stems
You probably haven't enabled no-stem-extend
Cheers,
Robin
Ah, yes - thanks for the hint; I did't know that there is such a property.
Now it works like a charm.
Marc
On 9/26/09 10:59 PM, Nick Payne njpa...@internode.on.net wrote:
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second example
don't seem to match the output. The comment says No auto-beaming is
defined for
Hello,
is there a way to lower the distance between the point where a slur
starts (or ends, respectively)
and the corresponding (tab) note head *without* manipulating every
slur's control-points?
Thanks in advance
Marc
___
lilypond-user mailing
Hi Luis,
You might try taking a look at a solution from Mats here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-02/msg00395.html
HTH,
Trevor.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:18 PM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
hello list, apologies in advance if this is silly or obvious,
On 9/27/09 6:08 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
Nick Payne wrote:
I'm looking at the 2.13.3 documentation on this in the NR (starts on
p.47 of the PDF manual), and the comments against the the second
example don't seem to match the output. The comment says No
Dear community,
I wanted to install sib2ly, but I couldn't download at
http://drupal.mjs-svc.com/sib2ly.
Is it available somewhere else?
I found another plugin at http://www.scramblelovers.com/lilypond/ but it
isn't recognized by Sibelius.
Maybee it works only for a special version?
on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
2.13.4.
i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very happy to see that the
automatic placing of beams had improved greatly
In the attached example, in the first bar I can increase the spacing
between the first chord and the the arpeggio on the second chord by
overriding Staff.Arpeggio #'X-extent, but in the second bar, using the
same override does nothing to increase the spacing between the arpeggio
and the
Hello,
Not too long ago, I gave my opinion that No fiddling should be
changed to less fiddling for the new website.
After trying to do a quick exercise with a Schumann score, which I
posted here concerning a slur tweak after a line break, I don't think the
less fiddling claim is
HI Jonathan,
what do the experienced users think about what I've said here?
If there's anyone out there who has used other notational
software and thinks the less fiddling claim is true?
I used Finale from 1991-2003, eventually becoming *quite* proficient.
Then I switched to Lilypond (around
Hi Marc,
is there a way to lower the distance between the point where a slur
starts (or ends, respectively)
and the corresponding (tab) note head *without* manipulating every
slur's control-points?
Can you increase the Y-offset?
Cheers,
Kieren.
Hi Nick,
in the second bar, using the same override does nothing to
increase the spacing between the arpeggio and the preceding note.
Hmmm... that's probably because of the multiple-voices... but seems
like maybe a bug?
What means can I use to increase the spacing there?
Well, it's
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: No fiddling claim
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date: Monday, September 28, 2009, 12:20 AM
HI Jonathan,
what
On 9/27/09 10:23 AM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
on 2009-09-27 at 08:02 Carl Sorensen wrote:
The autobeaming behavior (and the documentation) have been fixed in
2.13.4.
i find a regression in 2.13.4 with respect to 2.13.3.
i recently updated to 2.13.3 and i was very
24 matches
Mail list logo
