Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite
Kirill sidos...@yandex.ru writes:
Update for sib2ly released (v1.01, 2 Feb 2010)
* Chord symbols now supported.
Confirmed.
* sib2lydump.plg updated to work with Sibelius 5.
Confirmed.
I'm very impressed!
Johan,
When you reported that chords do not work, I misunderstood you at first.
The chords as in c e g of course always worked.
Oops, my fault. Being a guitar player, chord more naturally refers
to C than c e g.
The chord *symbols* as in A#7 or Bbsus4 are now implemented in
version 1.01. The example you sent me translates fine, so do chord
symbols in the example scores that come with Sibelius 5 (but see
below).
What I get now is that chord symbols come out twice. Once as a chord
symbol and once as a markup. E.g.,
Bar BarNumber=2 Length=1024
Text position=0 voicenumber=1 dx=24 dy=144 hidden=false
Text=Bm7 StyleId=text.staff.space.chordsymbol
TextWithFormattingAsString=Bm7 StyleAsText=Chord symbol
/Text
...
Text position=512 voicenumber=1 dx=24 dy=144 hidden=false
Text=E7 StyleId=text.staff.space.chordsymbol
TextWithFormattingAsString=E7 StyleAsText=Chord symbol
/Text
produces
Soprano = {
...
r4^\markup {Bm7} e8^\markup {E7} fis8 gis8 a8 b8 c8 |%2
and
SopranoChords = {
\chords
...
b1*1/4:m7 e1*3/4:7 |%2
Incidentally, what does F#m7(4) mean
Most likely that a piano player tries to write guitar chords :)
Thanks, thanks, thanks (and keep going!)
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond vs Score
After seeing that output, I'm curious: has anybody played around in Lilypond with making the staff curve around (like forming a circle, or just bending down the page or something)? I'd like to be able to do that. Best, Jonathan This is exactly why I 'm so glad that Lilypond can produce SVG output. Import the SVG into Inkscape 0.47 and you can do ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING with your score. I've said it before - SVG output from Lilypond can be imported into Inkscape, where the graphical elements can be manipulated in any way you want. No restrictions on placement of notes, spacing, text, pictures, grob sizes, bend staves, stems, etc. The LilyPond/LilyPondTool/Inkscape combination is OUTSTANDING. Gerard ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ambitus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 February 2010 22:41:36 you wrote: On 31 January 2010 20:01, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote: You can write your own engraver that listens to the note-event rather than the created NoteHead grobs. There, you can easily extract the pitch... Of course! Though there's still the problem of how to funnel the pitch information to a title markup... Isn't it possible to generate the ambitus score object in the 'finalize method of the engraver and assign it to a header field? One could then use subtitle=\fromproperty #'header:ambitus to get the ambitus printed. However, I'm currently stuck at how to obtain the score the engraver is assigned to (of course, one could always simply insert into $defaultlayout...). So, given the engraver object (or the associated context), how can I obtain the score object or its header layout? Cheers, Reinhold -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktptCsACgkQTqjEwhXvPN0p5ACgrrnSUQHkBAGmWvUn+cOOMq/o Ee4AoID5xOp7MdCdI8Wasn5wVRga6RGA =HINf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Drop D tuning
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar (6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any suggestions? -- Brett In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world. -- Jelaleddin Rumi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
Hi Brett,
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any suggestions?
\version 2.13.11
dropD = \markup \line { \circle 6 = D }
\header {
title = Drip, Drip, Drop-D
piece = \dropD
}
\score {
\relative d { \clef treble_8 d1 }
}
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
\version 2.13.11
dropD = \markup \line { \circle 6 = D }
\header {
title = Drip, Drip, Drop-D
piece = \dropD
}
\score {
\relative d { \clef treble_8 d1 }
}
Hope this helps!
It sure did, exactly what I was looking for! Thanks!
-- Brett
In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world.
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
Brett,
This is a modification of the code I use to draw this mark. Maybe you
can put this in the \header block somewhere where it will appear in the
appropriate place. I place this mark below the first system's clef by
attaching it to the first note an then using an \tweak or an offset
script to maneuver it to where I want it to go.
To really understand how this works and how the command relate to each
other, I'd recommend looking up each of these commands in the Command
index and reading the sections that they are explained in:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/LilyPond-command-index#LilyPond-command-index
\markup {
\column {
\line {
\general-align #Y #CENTER {
\circle \fontsize #-4.5 \musicglyph #six \tiny { = D }
}
}
}
}
Brett McCoy wrote:
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any
suggestions?
-- Brett
In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world.
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
How to glue markup with parameter passed note in define-music-function environment?
Hello,
I'm trying to define music function, a note with baroque descriptions.
So it boils down to achieving (simplified example):
c'_\markup{s}
via:
fun = #(define-music-function
(parser location note)
(ly:music?)
#{
$note \mark \markup{ s }
#})
{
\fun c'
}
---
\mark enters another object (I think) and s is misplaced. The question
is, how to achieve
$note_\markup{ s }
in define-music-function definition.. because $note_ can't be parsed correctly.
Thanks,
--
Paweł Różański
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
On 03.02.2010, at 20:45, David Stocker wrote: Brett, This is a modification of the code I use to draw this mark. Maybe you can put this in the \header block somewhere where it will appear in the appropriate place. Sorry, I'm having difficulty visualizing this. Where in the \header block do you consider to be an appropriate place? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
parts without time (and bars and key)
I want to write without time, with no bars and - with no key-signature (or C-major), but the behavior should be: every accidental holds only for one note, so naturals aren't necessary (can be forced like always with ! or ?) but for repeated fis e.g. it is printed always a sharp. Is there already a predefined key and time for that or do I have to make everything manually? Greetings Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
Kieren suggested piece. James Bailey wrote: On 03.02.2010, at 20:45, David Stocker wrote: Brett, This is a modification of the code I use to draw this mark. Maybe you can put this in the \header block somewhere where it will appear in the appropriate place. Sorry, I'm having difficulty visualizing this. Where in the \header block do you consider to be an appropriate place? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
Yes, David, I put your markup in piece and it worked fine, just like Kieren's version. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:22 PM, David Stocker dstoc...@thenotesetter.com wrote: Kieren suggested piece. James Bailey wrote: On 03.02.2010, at 20:45, David Stocker wrote: Brett, This is a modification of the code I use to draw this mark. Maybe you can put this in the \header block somewhere where it will appear in the appropriate place. Sorry, I'm having difficulty visualizing this. Where in the \header block do you consider to be an appropriate place? -- In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world. -- Jelaleddin Rumi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
I prefer to have the indication just to the left of the first stave, and
for this I set the instrument name, as it automatically gets placed
correctly:
\relative c' {
\clef treble_8
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \bold { \circle {6} = D }
c1
}
Nick
On 04/02/10 06:28, Brett McCoy wrote:
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any
suggestions?
attachment: test0.preview.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
That looks nice, too. In many guitar books, though, I see it placed at
the top, especially if other strings need to be downtuned also, like a
lot of metal guitarists do.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
I prefer to have the indication just to the left of the first stave, and for
this I set the instrument name, as it automatically gets placed correctly:
\relative c' {
\clef treble_8
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \bold { \circle {6} = D }
c1
}
Nick
On 04/02/10 06:28, Brett McCoy wrote:
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any
suggestions?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world.
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
Oh yeah, that makes total sense. Thanks. I haven't seen Kieren's email yet. On 03.02.2010, at 21:22, David Stocker wrote: Kieren suggested piece. James Bailey wrote: On 03.02.2010, at 20:45, David Stocker wrote: Brett, This is a modification of the code I use to draw this mark. Maybe you can put this in the \header block somewhere where it will appear in the appropriate place. Sorry, I'm having difficulty visualizing this. Where in the \header block do you consider to be an appropriate place? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
Oh yeah, that makes total sense. Thanks. I haven't seen Kieren's email yet. On 03.02.2010, at 21:22, David Stocker wrote: Kieren suggested piece. James Bailey wrote: On 03.02.2010, at 20:45, David Stocker wrote: Brett, This is a modification of the code I use to draw this mark. Maybe you can put this in the \header block somewhere where it will appear in the appropriate place. Sorry, I'm having difficulty visualizing this. Where in the \header block do you consider to be an appropriate place? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
That can be accomodated too:-) e.g.
\relative c' {
\clef treble_8
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \column {
\bold \line { \circle {3} = F# }
\bold \line { \circle {6} = D }
}
c1
}
Nick
On 04/02/10 07:32, Brett McCoy wrote:
That looks nice, too. In many guitar books, though, I see it placed at
the top, especially if other strings need to be downtuned also, like a
lot of metal guitarists do.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
I prefer to have the indication just to the left of the first stave, and for
this I set the instrument name, as it automatically gets placed correctly:
\relative c' {
\clef treble_8
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \bold { \circle {6} = D }
c1
}
Nick
On 04/02/10 06:28, Brett McCoy wrote:
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any
suggestions?
attachment: test0.preview.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
And for a piece like Koyunbaba, where five of the six strings are
retuned, something like this:
%==
\version 2.13.11
\include english.ly
\pointAndClickOff
actual = \markup {
\lower #1.9
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\remove Time_signature_engraver
} {
\set Staff.instrumentName= \markup \huge (actual)
\clef treble_8 \cadenzaOn
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
d, a, d a d' f'4 s \bar dashed
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 1\cm
}
}
\hspace #.5
}
scordatura = \markup {
\lower #2.4
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\remove Time_signature_engraver
} {
\set Staff.instrumentName= \markup \tiny (scordatura)
\clef treble_8 \cadenzaOn
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
d, a, d g b e'4 s \bar dashed
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 1\cm
}
}
\hspace #.5
}
actualnotes = \relative c {
\clef treble_8
d,8( f) bf d a' d4
}
scordaturanotes = \relative c {
\clef treble_8
d,8( f-3) bf-1 d-0 g-0 b!-04
}
\score {
\new Staff
\set Staff.instrumentName = \actual
\new Voice \actualnotes
\new Staff
\set Staff.instrumentName = \scordatura
\new Voice \scordaturanotes
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 5\cm
\context {
\Staff
\remove Time_signature_engraver
}
}
}
%==
Nick
On 04/02/10 07:32, Brett McCoy wrote:
That looks nice, too. In many guitar books, though, I see it placed at
the top, especially if other strings need to be downtuned also, like a
lot of metal guitarists do.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
I prefer to have the indication just to the left of the first stave, and for
this I set the instrument name, as it automatically gets placed correctly:
\relative c' {
\clef treble_8
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \bold { \circle {6} = D }
c1
}
Nick
On 04/02/10 06:28, Brett McCoy wrote:
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any
suggestions?
attachment: test0.preview.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: parts without time (and bars and key)
I guess you just use c major and for accidentals See Notation Reference -
Automatic accidentals. One of those will do what you want ('dodecaphonic' or
possibly 'forget').
I don't know about no time but you can also remove the bar engraver
See same document
Visibility and color of objects
It's all in there if you look hard enough.
James
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Werner
Sent: Wed 03/02/2010 20:20
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: parts without time (and bars and key)
I want to write without time, with no bars and - with no key-signature (or
C-major), but the behavior should be: every accidental holds only for one note,
so naturals aren't necessary (can be forced like always with ! or ?) but for
repeated fis e.g. it is printed always a sharp.
Is there already a predefined key and time for that or do I have to make
everything manually?
Greetings
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to glue markup with parameter passed note indefine-music-function environment?
how to achieve
$note_\markup{ s }
in define-music-function definition.. because $note_ can't be parsed
correctly.
Well, you can try this work-around with a \skip and a construct.
%
fun = #(define-music-function (parser location note)(ly:music?)
#{
$note s1*0_\markup { s }
#})
\new Voice { \fun c' }
%
For a more advanced function, you'll have to use scheme.
See http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=82 for example.
Gilles
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drop D tuning
That's an interesting way to do it.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
And for a piece like Koyunbaba, where five of the six strings are retuned,
something like this:
%==
\version 2.13.11
\include english.ly
\pointAndClickOff
actual = \markup {
\lower #1.9
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\remove Time_signature_engraver
} {
\set Staff.instrumentName= \markup \huge (actual)
\clef treble_8 \cadenzaOn
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
d, a, d a d' f'4 s \bar dashed
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 1\cm
}
}
\hspace #.5
}
scordatura = \markup {
\lower #2.4
\score {
\new Staff \with {
\remove Time_signature_engraver
} {
\set Staff.instrumentName= \markup \tiny (scordatura)
\clef treble_8 \cadenzaOn
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
d, a, d g b e'4 s \bar dashed
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 1\cm
}
}
\hspace #.5
}
actualnotes = \relative c {
\clef treble_8
d,8( f) bf d a' d4
}
scordaturanotes = \relative c {
\clef treble_8
d,8( f-3) bf-1 d-0 g-0 b!-04
}
\score {
\new Staff
\set Staff.instrumentName = \actual
\new Voice \actualnotes
\new Staff
\set Staff.instrumentName = \scordatura
\new Voice \scordaturanotes
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 5\cm
\context {
\Staff
\remove Time_signature_engraver
}
}
}
%==
Nick
On 04/02/10 07:32, Brett McCoy wrote:
That looks nice, too. In many guitar books, though, I see it placed at
the top, especially if other strings need to be downtuned also, like a
lot of metal guitarists do.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Nick Paynenick.pa...@internode.on.net
wrote:
I prefer to have the indication just to the left of the first stave, and
for
this I set the instrument name, as it automatically gets placed
correctly:
\relative c' {
\clef treble_8
\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \bold { \circle {6} = D }
c1
}
Nick
On 04/02/10 06:28, Brett McCoy wrote:
I have a score where I need to indicate Drop D tuning for the guitar
(6th string is tuned down to D). The typical way this is indicated in
guitar music is a (6) = D (circle with a 6 in it = D), placed at the
top left of page 1 under the title, but above a tempo mark. I am
relatively new to Lilypond and am unsure how to do this... any
suggestions?
--
In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world.
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to glue markup with parameter passed note indefine-music-function environment?
how to achieve
$note_\markup{ s }
$note s1*0_\markup { s }
Ahh of course :) a zero length skip
In my example it works better without
I just s1*0_\markup { s} $note, so it enters markup in place, and add
note thereafter.
For a more advanced function, you'll have to use scheme.
See http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=82 for example.
No thanks, i have to code on daily basis... If I can achieve something
in lilypond
without closures - I'll stick to it :) Example is nice, anyway.
Lilypond teach me music well - no need for such constructs.
I'll post my crude example another day.
Thank you very much
--
Paweł Różański
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite
Hi Kirill, This is an interesting approach to Sibelius to LilyPond conversion. However, I do agree with Carl's earlier message. It seems that a more generally useful approach would be to improve MusicXML to LilyPond conversion. The Dolet 5 for Sibelius and Dolet 5 for Finale converters both convert nearly as much musical information to MusicXML as is possible via the program's plug- in interface. Dolet 1 for Sibelius is many years old and designed for much older versions of Sibelius that did not have such extensive plug-in capabilities. Obviously one can do much better than Dolet 1 with Sibelius 6, but I don't think this extends to Dolet 5. I would be interested in hearing what you can convert directly to your XML format from your plug-in that is not being exported with the Dolet 5 for Sibelius plug-in. If it's available from the Sibelius 6.1 plug-in interface, Dolet 5 should export it to the MusicXML file. There will definitely be lossiness going from Sibelius to an intermediate format, and from that intermediate format to LilyPond. But I think the lossiness will be minimized if that intermediate format is MusicXML produced by our latest Dolet plug-ins. The focus of the development could then be on reducing the lossiness of MusicXML to LilyPond conversions. That would make things work better for all programs - commercial programs like Finale or Sibelius, or free programs like MuseScore. Best regards, Michael Good Recordare LLC ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: String number collision
David Stocker wrote: Greetings. Your example works as is in 2.13.11, with the string number indications appearing above the beams of the notes. I'm using the 2.12 stable branch. Is 2.13.11 mostly usable? -- Bob Wooldridge Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: String number collision
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:42:18PM -0600, Bobber wrote: David Stocker wrote: Your example works as is in 2.13.11, with the string number indications appearing above the beams of the notes. I'm using the 2.12 stable branch. Is 2.13.11 mostly usable? 2.13.12 (not yet released) has 17 critical issues, fixing 4 of the 21 critical issues in 2.13.11. It is not recommended for normal users. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Major and minor
Hi,
I include a file, on which I tried to show a probblem.
When major, a triangle is put up the name of the chord, when minor, a m is
written on the same level as the chord.
Is it possible to have the triangle and the mat the chord level, and keep
the rest as it is?
With thanks and regards,
Eric
%%
\version 2.12.3
#(define (conditional-kern-before markup bool amount)
Add AMOUNT of space before MARKUP if BOOL is true.
(if bool
(make-line-markup
(list (make-hspace-markup amount)
markup))
markup))
#(define-public (alteration-text-accidental-markup alteration)
(make-smaller-markup
(make-raise-markup
(if (= alteration FLAT)
1.7
2)
(make-musicglyph-markup
(assoc-get alteration standard-alteration-glyph-name-alist )
#(define (accidental-markup alteration)
Return accidental markup for ALTERATION.
(if (= alteration 0)
(make-line-markup (list empty-markup))
(conditional-kern-before
(alteration-text-accidental-markup alteration)
(= alteration FLAT) 0.2)))
#(define-public (special-note-name-markup pitch)
Return pitch markup for PITCH.
(make-line-markup
(list
(make-simple-markup
(vector-ref #(C D E F G A B) (ly:pitch-notename pitch)))
(accidental-markup (ly:pitch-alteration pitch)
\layout {
\context {
\Score
chordRootNamer = #special-note-name-markup
}
}
\chords {
c1:maj c1:min c1:maj7 c1:min7 cis1:dim7 cisd1:aug7
}
%%
--
Éric Bouvéron
G/F, 66 Kai Yuen street
North Point
Hong Kong S.A.R.
Tél: 2972 2567
9046 3611
Skype: Wafaic
QUOS VULT PERDERE JUPITER DEMENTAT
Please consider reducing waste by not printing this email.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
String number tuning
I would like to have more control over where string numbers, left hand fingerings and right hand fingers are placed. I mean putting them below a note, to the side or above. Is this possible? -- Bob Wooldridge Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: String number tuning
Bob, Not only is it possible, but it is probable that doing so will increase your fun quotient with LilyPond. You'll be interested in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Inside-the-staff#Fingering-instructions In particular, be aware that modifications like \set fingeringOrientations = '#(left) don't have an effect on fingerings placed on notes which are not within a chord construct. That is, if you want a single note fingering to go left (or right or down), you'll have to put it into chord braces -- b-14 rather than b4-1 (that trips up a lot of new users when they start modifying fingering placements). Have fun, David Bobber wrote: I would like to have more control over where string numbers, left hand fingerings and right hand fingers are placed. I mean putting them below a note, to the side or above. Is this possible? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite
Michael Good wrote: Obviously one can do much better than Dolet 1 with Sibelius 6, but I don't think this extends to Dolet 5. Hi Michael, Granted, your Dolet 5 is perhaps much more advanced than the earlier versions. I'm sure you are doing a wonderful job there, and a very useful one too. I haven't tried Dolet 5 yet, though, as it costs $199. However, I am such a militant believer in Free Software, that even if I *did* start working on MusicXML-LilyPond converter, I would be ethically compelled to first produce a free and open source exporter from Sibelius to MusicXML, essentially duplicating the functionality of Dolet and intruding on your territory. I do not want to do that. Best, Kirill Sidorov ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: String number tuning
Tried it but nothing happens:
% measure 2:
{ r8 c'8 e8 c8 e4 } \\
{ \set fingeringOrientations = #'(right) c,2.-4 }
David Stocker wrote:
Bob,
Not only is it possible, but it is probable that doing so will
increase your fun quotient with LilyPond.
You'll be interested in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Inside-the-staff#Fingering-instructions
In particular, be aware that modifications like \set
fingeringOrientations = '#(left) don't have an effect on fingerings
placed on notes which are not within a chord construct. That is, if
you want a single note fingering to go left (or right or down), you'll
have to put it into chord braces -- b-14 rather than b4-1 (that
trips up a lot of new users when they start modifying fingering
placements).
Have fun,
David
Bobber wrote:
I would like to have more control over where string numbers, left
hand fingerings and right hand fingers are placed. I mean putting
them below a note, to the side or above. Is this possible?
--
Bob Wooldridge
Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Editing notes in a separate file
On 1/2/10 10:06 AM, Michael J. O'Donnell addr...@hidden wrote: In the hope that I had overlooked something (I've read the whole notation manual, but there are clearly things that haven't made it in yet---I've found some of them in the *.scm and *.ly sources but there are bound to be others that I've missed) I posted the query. Please let us know the things you've found that haven't made it into the Notation Reference yet; the Notation Reference is intended to be exhaustive. Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Re: String number tuning
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Try
2 in the 2nd voice.
Nick
On Thu 04/02/10 2:09 PM , Bobber bob...@kc0dxf.net sent:
Tried it but nothing happens:
% measure 2:
{ r8 c'8 e8 c8 e4 } \
{ set fingeringOrientations = #'(right) c,2.-4 }
David Stocker wrote:
Bob,
Not only is it possible, but it is probable that doing so will
increase your fun quotient with LilyPond.
You'll be interested in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Inside-the-staff#Fingering-instructions
In particular, be aware that modifications like set
fingeringOrientations = '#(left) don't have an effect on fingerings
placed on notes which are not within a chord construct. That is, if
you want a single note fingering to go left (or right or down),
you'll
have to put it into chord braces -- 4 rather than b4-1 (that
trips up a lot of new users when they start modifying fingering
placements).
Have fun,
David
Bobber wrote:
I would like to have more control over where string numbers, left
hand fingerings and right hand fingers are placed. I mean putting
them below a note, to the side or above. Is this possible?
--
Bob Wooldridge
Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Michael Good wrote: There will definitely be lossiness going from Sibelius to an intermediate format, and from that intermediate format to LilyPond. But I think the lossiness will be minimized if that intermediate format is MusicXML produced by our latest Dolet plug-ins. The focus of the development could then be on reducing the lossiness of MusicXML to LilyPond conversions. That would make things work better for all programs - commercial programs like Finale or Sibelius, or free programs like MuseScore. It would make things even much better if the Dolet plugins would be free or at least cost much less than they do now. Then more people will start using it, more bugs will be revealed, and feature requests will be reported, more bugs will be fixed, and development speed will be increased drastically. For example, how many people in this mailinglist actually bought the Dolet plugin for Sibelius ? Everyone has his own preferred music scoring tool. For me that is Lilypond, for others this may be Sibelius, or Finale, or MuseScore. MusicXML was and still is a great idea aiming to provide a way to exchange scores between all these tools. I just don't hope MusicXML will be like Esperanto: The Universal Language that practically no one really uses. -- Martin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
