On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Instead, it would make more sense if people opted to take care of
something like a chapter at a time, or the
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
c8 c c c c c
r c c c c c
}
attachment: 2.15.39.pngattachment:
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the
other voice each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using
\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift, but that didn't move the note. What
can I
I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings file.
Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poor english. :S
Pierre
2012/5/23 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:11PM +0800, James Harkins wrote:
Not sure if this was already discussed (I've been following the thread
somewhat loosely), but it seems to me that git makes it a whole lot
easier to handle a build token by virtue of the repositories being
decentralized.
Yes, it
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
For those who are interested in my talk about LilyPond at the recent
event in Chemnitz, the slides are at
URL:http://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2012/vortraege/900.
Since my talks tend to do more than just reading off the slides, the
impression may be rather
On 24 May 2012 10:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings file.
Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poor english. :S
Hi Pierre, Thomas, dear LilyPond users,
Could you please make sure you do
Am 24.05.2012 10:57, schrieb Colin Hall:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:11PM +0800, James Harkins wrote:
Not sure if this was already discussed (I've been following the thread
somewhat loosely), but it seems to me that git makes it a whole lot
easier to handle a build token by virtue of the
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
c8 c c c c c
r c c c c c
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time
Hi David,
thanks for your fantastic work for the Lilypond project!
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I mention funding problems for my work at the end of the talk. It turns
out that this month has dropped so far in one-time monetary
contributions compared to
2012/5/24 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar needs
to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the other voice
each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using \override
NoteColumn
Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se writes:
tor 2012-05-24 klockan 11:28 +0200 skrev David Kastrup:
I mention funding problems for my work at the end of the talk. It turns
out that this month has dropped so far in one-time monetary
contributions compared to the rather slow uptake of regular
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would
Am 24.05.2012 14:14, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all
2012/5/24 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
Hi Pierre, Thomas, dear LilyPond users,
Could you please make sure you do not cross-post your messages to the
French users mailing list (lilypond-user-fr)?
Hi Xavier,
sorry, I answered to all, not investigating the adresses. Will do in future.
2012/5/24 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings file.
Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poor english. :S
Pierre
2012/5/23 Thomas Morley
On 24/05/12 22:17, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 14:14, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:19:29PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
A regression is something that doesn't work in a later version and that has
_deliberately_ worked in a previous version. I.e. something that has once
been fixed to work in
I thank you very much for your nice help Thomas.
2012/5/24 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
2012/5/24 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Jonghyun Kim agitato...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Janek!
I'm Apple User. Is it right?
/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/scm/autochange.scm
i guess so... i don't have a Mac, but this looks plausible.
cheers,
Janek
Do I send crash reports to this list?___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The following music doesn't compile on the mac and causes a segfault on Linux.
Environments:
Mac OSX Lion
Ubuntu 12.04
LilyPond Versions
2.14.2-1 (mac)
2.14.2-2 (ubu from apt-get)
Command from ubu:
jbarnes@jbarnes-OptiPlex-780:~/mac/Documents/apc/music$ lilypond
WhenILookIntoYourHoliness.ly
I'm trying to post a crash report.
It seems all my messages are getting bounced from the list server.
??
Jeff
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: m...@apollinemike.com
To: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine
- Original Message -
From: m...@apollinemike.com
To: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se writes:
When donating, is there any mechanism in place by which funds will be
donated only if some target level is reached by all donations
together? I'm speculating people might be more comfortable
This is great!
one question: How did you manage to create that endless, one-system layout?
Best
Urs
Am 23.05.2012 20:15, schrieb FireTight:
Hello,
my name is Jiri FireTight Szabo and I would like to introduce program
ly2video to you. This program can generate videos from your LilyPond
Nick Payne wrote:
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the
other voice each side of it.
Boy, that's a tough situation. Personally, I would not call your
example ugly. The note heads, for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks great! A few notes — almost all negative, so I should say that
aside from these, it seems a really excellent start.
1) In the download, the Python script isn’t executable. See if you
can make it so within the zip file.
[I have some package
There are page breaks, too.
But they are not often, in the videos at least.
Nils
On Thu, 24 May 2012 18:05:11 +0200
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
This is great!
one question: How did you manage to create that endless, one-system layout?
Best
Urs
Am 23.05.2012 20:15, schrieb
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se writes:
When donating, is there any mechanism in place by which funds will be
donated only if some target level is reached by all donations
together?
Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com wrote:
How about Urs, Susan, you and I collaborating on a one-page score
via github as a way of confirming our understanding, and demonstrating
how it can be done? Even a few staves would be enough to confirm a suitable
2012/5/23 Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com:
Ok, I checked the archives and saw another crash report on \shape, so I'll
post my details here.
Environments:
Ubuntu 12.04
Mac OSX Lion
Versions:
2.14.2 on ubu
2.14.2-1 on mac
Command on ubu:
Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
following was written by David Kastrup:
You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
all unless a minimum is met, meaning that I have to finance the whole
month on my own. This is not exactly
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se wrote:
Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
following was written by David Kastrup:
You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
all unless a minimum is met,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar needs
to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the other voice
each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com wrote:
Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors?
I see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
donates developers to projects the company have an interest in.
As
Janek Warchoł wrote:
Unfortunately, that's not going to happen soon. Even small, local
publishers (i've asked some not long ago) are not interested in
anything else than Finale/Sibelius. I predict that it will take 3-5
years before any major publisher begins using LilyPond, let alone
Marek Klein
0918 610 720
http://gregoriana.sk
2012/5/24 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the other
voice each side of it. I tried moving the note to
Hi Jiri,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:15 PM, FireTight fireti...@gmail.com wrote:
my name is Jiri FireTight Szabo and I would like to introduce program
ly2video to you. This program can generate videos from your LilyPond
projects that contains moving music staff, which is synchronized to music
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Marek Klein ma...@gregoriana.sk wrote:
Maybe it is proportional notation what you are looking for?
I don't think so. using proportional notation doesn't fix the lack
of optical spacing between notes in different voices issue. The a is
still visually closer to c
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
Janek Warchoł wrote:
Unfortunately, that's not going to happen soon. Even small, local
publishers (i've asked some not long ago) are not interested in
anything else than Finale/Sibelius. I predict that it will take 3-5
years
It tends to feel like the classical case of Somebody Else's Problem,
and I am somewhat at a loss of how to deal with that without getting
cynical to a degree that those who do support me don't deserve.
Man, I feel ya.
I started playing around with LilyPond recently. I like it. As someone who
Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
twice.
I'll not repeat the points I made in private communication, but for the
sake of
Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se writes:
Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
following was written by David Kastrup:
You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
all unless a minimum is met, meaning that I have to finance the whole
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Looks to me like a bug in 2.14.2. Beaming 5 quavers together doesn't give
much clue to the beat pattern?
+1, 2.14 behavior seems wrong to me.
BTW, Ted Ross says in 3/4, [...] notes on the second beat can be
beamed with
Tim Roberts t...@probo.com writes:
Janek Warchoł wrote:
Unfortunately, that's not going to happen soon. Even small, local
publishers (i've asked some not long ago) are not interested in
anything else than Finale/Sibelius. I predict that it will take 3-5
years before any major publisher
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com wrote:
Do I send crash reports to this list?
Not quite. They /usually/ should go to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org .
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, I checked the archives and saw
Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
twice.
Point taken. Won't happen again.
Please read
Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com writes:
Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
twice.
Point taken. Won't happen again.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:37 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com writes:
Just curious. If there wasn't a free as in beer version of a GPL
software package, wouldn't one logically expect a fork? How does GNU
address that?
You can't fork what has not been
On 25/05/12 02:47, Tim Roberts wrote:
Nick Payne wrote:
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the
other voice each side of it.
Boy, that's a tough situation. Personally, I would not call your
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:37 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com writes:
Just curious. If there wasn't a free as in beer version of a GPL
software package, wouldn't one logically expect a fork? How does GNU
I suppose the situation might be as follows: source code is freely
available (on website, github or whatever), but the binaries are not.
Anyone tech-savvy enough to serve himself doesn't have to pay, but
simple users do have. I think that if the price was low (say, 5$)
nobody might be
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:42:17PM +, Jeff wrote:
I'm trying to post a crash report.
It seems all my messages are getting bounced from the list server.
??
I see your post to lilypond-user, Jeff.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
On 2012-05-24, at 12:56 PM, Jeff Barnes jbarnes...@yahoo.com wrote:
And actually, releasing source for free but binaries for fee makes
some sense.
Agreed. Especially on platforms where build environments aren't free
But if I had to pay to update from 2.14 to 2.16, I just wouldn't,
On May 24, 2012, at 1:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
twice.
This in unfortunately more
On May 24, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors? I
see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
donates developers to projects the company have an interest in.
Hmm. OpenOffice for
Tim McNamara wrote;
On May 24, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors? I
see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
donates developers to projects the company have an interest in.
Hi Marcos,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:40:04AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:08:44PM -0300, Marcos da Silva Sampaio wrote:
Hello,
I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
and I got this error message:
An official Lilypond release
This is a long discussion. We had similar ones in the past. That's useless.
I followed the development of 2.15. in every detail, that I understood
and I want to say that due to David's engagement and skill-ranks
LilyPond has improved in a way that I hardly can believe.
If David isn't payed for
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is
not beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
c8 c c c c c
r c c c c c
}
With more than one voice, using Timing.measurePosition for partial bars
results in spurious barcheck errors and also causes problems with
automatic beaming:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
{
\partial 4.
c4. |
c8 c c c c c |
c c c c c c |
On 25/05/12 12:26, Nick Payne wrote:
With more than one voice, using Timing.measurePosition for partial
bars results in spurious barcheck errors and also causes problems with
automatic beaming...
Sorry, I should have mentioned that this is with 2.15.39.
Nick
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
With more than one voice, using Timing.measurePosition for partial bars
results in spurious barcheck errors and also causes problems with automatic
beaming:
...
c c c c c c |
\set
I wish to manually override the position of a beam, but Lily insists on
flipping the direction of a notehead.
Any ideas on how to avoid this?
Thx, Javier
\version 2.14.2
\score {
\new Staff
\relative c'{
\once \override Beam #'positions = #'(-0.9 . -1.6 )
On 25/05/12 13:20, J Ruiz wrote:
I wish to manually override the position of a beam, but Lily insists
on flipping the direction of a notehead.
Any ideas on how to avoid this?
Thx, Javier
\version 2.14.2
\score {
\new Staff
\relative c'{
\once \override Beam
Mogens Lemvig Hansen mog...@kayju.com writes:
Just some thoughts, sadly no solution. Why don't we find some
billionaire who can just hire David to do what David does best?
You'll find that billionaires tend to be a bit hard to approach since
there are millions of people with ideas that they
deletia/
Hi Marc,
I'm will try to extend your work on bend.ly to include a few new cases. I'm
in the process of laying out some material by The Hellecasters and as you
can imagine I'm encountering many instances which require rather exotic
representations of bending techniques; double-stops,
71 matches
Mail list logo
