.
Quite cool: I modified the notation reference: When you click on one
of the examples, it will be opened in weblily.net's editor.
Cheers,
Weblily
**
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Mr. Weblily,
I like your enthusiasm with your weblily
I apologize for this email; I jumped to a false conclusion and
made a baseless accusation. I now have no reason to believe that
weblily poses a risk.
I'm sorry.
- Graham Percival
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:21:24PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
Mr. Weblily,
I like your enthusiasm with your
Yes, read the warning at the bottom of the doc page about grace
notes.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:07:43PM -0600, Patrick Karl wrote:
When I compile the following:
\version 2.12.2
S = \relative g'' {
\appoggiatura g16 f1
}
\score {
\new ChoirStaff
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:12:20PM -0600, Patrick Karl wrote:
On 8 Mar 2010 22:44:02 Graham Percival wrote:
This can be remedied by inserting grace skips of the corresponding
durations in the other staves.
Since I don't have any other staves, how does this note apply to my
case?
Read
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 07:46:28AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
This helps a lot, thanks! Note, however, since this file will
eventually be part of the documentation, that far too much lines are
longer than 80 or so characters, causing ugly formatting especially
within the PDF doc files.
FFS everybody.
Federico: omit point-and-click from your music definition files. Then make
violin-score.ly
cello-score.ly
all-book.ly
which just include your point-and-click NETURAL music definition
files. In the -score files, put your \score and enable
point-and-click and the top of it.
Why not use \numericTimeSignature ? See the 2.12 doc page about Time signature.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear community,
I don't understand, why this snippet doesn't work:
\version 2.12.2
\layout {
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:32:41AM +0800, Seng Hin Yew wrote:
I'm having a problem that lilypond will exclude the \partial bar in bar
counting. This \partial i meant was the first bar of a score. How to make
LP calculate it as a first bar?
This is not typical notation, but if you want
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 02:55:29AM +0800, Seng Hin Yew wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
wrote:
(I'm not 100% about the exact syntax, nor whether you want to
start at bar 1 or bar 2, but that's the basic idea)
I'm copying
Sorry for the long quoted text.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:59:07PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
James Bailey wrote:
This is basically what confuses people. No, it's not any different
than what's explained elsewhere, it's just that it's not explained all
together. All of the consituent
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
It would also be a great opportunity to include an option for
alternative TeX-compilers, e.g. xelatex, not just pdflatex.
Patches appreciated.
Do you have a rough estimate of the challenges
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:52:26PM +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Not in this case.
Well, the point is that at least 1 user made the mistake of trying to
get LP to use the 'latest' Python -- maybe worth adding a line or two
mentioning not to do this and explaining why
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:36:34AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Perhaps it makes sense to add a UTF-8 checker
to lilypond just for that.
This would certainly cut down on the number of questions asking
how do I write an accented character?. OTOH, it might prompt
confusion about how to save
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:23:36PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
I'm wondering if the Wikitex extension for Mediawiki is a secure
alternative to the LilyPond extension.
http://wikisophia.org/wiki/Wikitex
(as you can see, there is an Edit button... it is open to public
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:16:05PM +0100, Sven Siegmund wrote:
Uninstall python 3, as it can override library paths.
But I really need Python 3. It is much more unicode-aware than Python
2.x. Is there any hope that Lilypond-book will be ported to python 3?
Patches appreciated.
Python 3
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:22:07PM +0100, Helge Kruse wrote:
Reading this discussion makes me curious about SCORE. Do I have
the chance to try SCORE somehow?
Sure, for $750 or so.
I don't know where the webpage is to order it, but I'm sure it
can't be too hard to find.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:41:46PM +, Ami wrote:
Is there a file format converter from ly to musicXML or ly to Finale ETF?
No.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:03 AM, O Polite myli...@polite.se wrote:
Thanks. I was rather looking for some way to manipulate the entire
score programmatically. But maybe it's easier to export to midi and then
manipulate the midi file programmatically?
Are you asking how can I extract fragments
Thanks, this was added by Colin. It should be visible in 2.13.14 when
that comes out.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Federico Bruni brunol...@gmx.com wrote:
I have a suggestion to make doc even more straightforward.
In NR 2.4.1 (section Right-hand fingerings)
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Peter Chubb pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote:
Graham == Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Graham On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Peter Chubb
Graham lily.u...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote:
Trevor == Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Trevor
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
David Santamauro wrote:
What is the status (if any) of LilyPondTool MIDI output? Is there any
Hi, LilyPondTool is not, but LilyPond IS developed in that direction.
However, there is much work to do, and you
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Peter Chubb
lily.u...@chubb.wattle.id.au wrote:
Trevor == Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Trevor Peter's original announcement, with articulate.ly and some
Trevor instructions for its use is at
Trevor
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
huh. lilypond.org seems to be down at the moment, so I'll just
describe it: on the new webpage, click on Community, then Development,
then documentation suggestions.
Sorry, my memory was faulty. That should
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Steven White
saw7...@cacs.louisiana.edu wrote:
Just an inquiry, but is there any specific reason why the mailing list
doesn't have a prepended subject like [lilypond-user]?
That would make all the subject lines much longer. On some displays,
this wouldn't be a
Hi all,
Valentin and I are bringing back the LilyPond Report. The current
plan is one issue every two months. If more people get involved,
we might make it once a month.
I'm not going to bother with any of the cutesy fun stuff like
snippets, interviews, postcards, statistics... or pretty much
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
But the main problem remains: Lilypond developers are also very happy
Lilypond users, which could explain the lack of motivation to put a lot
of time and effort exporting to a format that only people who do NOT use
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 07:12:59PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
However, there is also a practical problem: How do you check the
quality of your export? There are so many things in the MusicXML
specification that are left unclear, and the typical advice on
the MusicXML mailing list is Just
I believe that those must be in *separate* \layout { \context{
blocks.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 05:33:22AM +0800, 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng wrote:
Ha, thanks. But I'm not so stupid. Of course I have
\layout {
\context {
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:18:54PM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Could this also be true for Lilypond ? Would it be better/easier to have
a --musicxml output option ( just like --png --ps and --pdf ) instead of
a separate application that has to be written from scratch ? Maybe then
the
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Those links should point to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/snippets/fretted-strings
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/internals/strokefinger
I believe this is now fixed in git.
Cheers,
-
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
I found out the hard way that apparently adding \RemoveEmptyStaffContext
globally to a score will erase some previous settings.
Yes. \removeEmptyStaffContext copies the new context over the
previous one. Or
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:04:04AM +, Werner wrote:
I think there should be a link in
NR 1.2.5 Bars
[1.2.5.4] Rehearsal marks
to
NR 5.5.1 Aligning Objects
[5.5.1.4] Using the break-alignable-interface
Otherwise its hard to find!
That sounds reasonable. James?
Btw - why not one
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:17:56AM +, Werner wrote:
Playing around I found out, that it doesn't work if there are the lines
\context { \RemoveEmptyStaffContext
% \context { \AncientRemoveEmptyStaffContext
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t
}
}
in the
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:20:23PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
If would be pedagogically simpler to realize this difference if the
syntax was separate if you define a context from scratch (as is the
case with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext) or if it's defined by adding onto
an existing context. For
In the 2.13 docs, it's in Usage 1.3 Error messages.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Patrick Karl pck...@mac.com wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:42:55 -0700
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
Subject: Re: Editing notes in a separate file
To:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:53:22PM +, Dave Addey wrote:
1) How do you rate my chances of getting Lilypond to compile for the
ARM-based iPhone OS, especially given the number of libraries it depends
on?
Compiling on an ARM-based chip? No problem. Debian's been
compiling lilypond
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:03:17PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Michael Good music...@gmail.com wrote:
It is unfortunate that LilyPond users cannot take advantage of
the same data freedom that Finale and Sibelius users can.
I agree that it is unfortunate
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 08:34:14PM -0500, Brett McCoy wrote:
I've read in a few places -- including the Lilypond documentation --
that, traditionally, when using rehearsal marks in a score, the letter
I is skipped. Does anyone know why this is done?
I'm pretty certain it's because I is easy to
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:42:18PM -0600, Bobber wrote:
David Stocker wrote:
Your example works as is in 2.13.11, with the string number
indications appearing above the beams of the notes.
I'm using the 2.12 stable branch. Is 2.13.11 mostly usable?
2.13.12 (not yet released) has 17
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:18:44AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Patrick Karl pck...@mac.com writes:
I have noticed a resource problem in LilyPond, namely invocation of
the Compile/Typeset file command in interactive mode always
consumes one more pid.
You are obviously not talking about
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:15 PM, pat eyler pat.ey...@gmail.com wrote:
I've looked over the lilypond doc output by denemo, and can't see
anything obvious. We're running lilypond 2.12.2 on Ubuntue 9.10.
MvmntIVoiceI = {
r8. e'2%|
This is an incomplete bar. If the bar-line check
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:37:42PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote Monday, February 01, 2010 11:52 AM
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Michael Kappler wrote:
I'm also still very interested if there are possibilities to
increase LilyPond performance further.
Please stop spamming. We saw your first email.
- Graham
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:01:55PM -0800, Kirill Sidorov wrote:
This concoction of mine might be of interest to some:
http://www.sidorefa.com/sib2ly/
To my best knowledge, this tool is substantially more powerful
than other
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Patrick Karl pck...@mac.com wrote:
Thanks for the report. I've fixed this in git.
Look at the docs in webgit first, and glance at the contributor's guide.
What are git and webgit? Where should I have learned that?
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:36:46PM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
On 01.02.2010, at 21:27, Patrick Karl wrote:
When I enter music, I incrementally compile it as I go.
I do my work on a Mac running OS 10.4. There are a fixed number of
pids available for all the programs running on the Mac.
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:57:49PM -0600, Bobber wrote:
I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the
music manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond or
Finale can produce engraving that is comparable to Score. And that most
of the major music
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 08:26:21PM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
What mechanism creates the index(s) for the documentation?
Texinfo. Somebody adds @cindex to the docs, and texinfo prints
the page of that entry.
If you want to add/move @cindex entries, we can talk. Look at the
docs in webgit first,
It's probably already in the tracker. I wouldn't bother
submitting it.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:20:07PM +0100, Jean-Alexis Montignies wrote:
Hi,
Should I submit the following as a bug?
As a work around I would like to add more space between the chords and the
system.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:39:51AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
IMHO, perfect would be to *attach* a complete lilypond file, so that
people
Well, IMO, it's better to have a short file in the body of the email.
Because that way I can look at it and identify errors without having to
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:56:25PM -0500, James Lowe wrote:
I had been trying to get a fermata to align centrally over the
last bar which is just a full rest (yes I know it makes no sense
musically but anyway..) I had been struggling.
...
R1^\fermata
Might I recommend looking in the index of
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:10:11PM -0500, James Lowe wrote:
I guess I was trying to illustrate what I thought was an
inconsistency or unexpected behaviour for the spacer as I often
use this method to manually align things like hairpins for
instance, or the odd dotted line text spanner when I
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 06:00:22PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
On 20/01/2010 15:55, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Probably you've another version installed.
Check which lilypond and the install path!
I've often wondered why, even though I have a version of LilyPond
installed from repository
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:12:25AM -0600, Patrick Karl wrote:
In any case, I would like to suggest that there are only two reasonable
responses to my request:
* resurrect the missing graphic files
* delete the Guide for the Absolute Beginner
My opinion is to delete it, but I'm not in
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
brownian@gmail.com wrote:
У сб, 2010-01-16 у 15:33 +, Graham Percival пише:
It would be nice if somebody could check the regtest comparison...
it's too late to recall 2.13.11 if it broke anything, but if it *did*
break something
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:27:26PM +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
For instance: In the ancient-accidental.ly regtest, the accidentals for
hufnagel and **MENSURAL** look exactly the same. Shouldn't they be
different? I don't know actually.
Well, ignore any regtests that you have no clue
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:41:54PM -0800, Patrick Horgan wrote:
I saw one document issue I thought I
might bring up with the editors, so checked the 2.13 LM to see if it was
already dealt with before I bothered people with something that had
already been fixed. To my surprise, I
Make sure you save the file in utf-8 format.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Battista Lonardi batti_ls...@yahoo.it wrote:
I'm using version 2.12.1.
If I put an accented vowels (such as à, è, ì, ò, ù) in a .ly file, the PDF
output doesn't show it at all.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:56 PM, David Raleigh Arnold
d...@openguitar.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:09:36 +
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
new feature (*cough* bugfix)
What does that mean?
It means that the SVG update introduced, and relied on, so many
architectural
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:51:19PM -0500, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
Thanks. So the answer is no. I thought bugfixes were applied
to stable releases.
That is correct. I will not backport this new feature (*cough*
bugfix) because I am a mean and lazy person and I hate all users.
Hopefully
Have you read
input/regression/gonville.ly
?
Also, you might want to consider adding some kind of docs about this.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:10:23PM -0500, James Lowe wrote:
Hello,
This maybe inappropriate, but can I use this method to use a different
font for the
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:28:25PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 1/10/10 9:43 PM, Eric Knapp ekn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in! What's first? I assume that I have a lot of reading to do. I
just downloaded all the 2.13 manuals. I have read most of them for
2.12. The links for the Extend
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:35:07AM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
I have a question. Given this input file:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
What;s the pdftex doing in there?
\begin{document}
\begin{lilypond}
\relative c' { c2 a'2 \times 2/3 { f8 e d } c'2 g4
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:57:41AM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
On 05.01.2010, at 10:38, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:35:07AM +0100, James Bailey wrote:
I have a question. Given this input file:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
What;s
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 12:22:27PM -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
If someone with real Scheme-fu could build a function that took a series of
moments and tweaks, you might be able to do something like
ms = \relative e'' {
e4 e c d |
}
correctionsEditionA = {
\coolSchemeFunction
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 08:12:49PM +, Tom Haring wrote:
It is aqbout the problem i have: how should I use it?
First, you're trying to compile lilypond 2.12.2, not install it.
If you just want to install it, download the binary.
Second, if you really want to compile for some reason, compile
at 07:02:40PM +0100, stefankaegi wrote:
I'm sorry, but it isn't really possible to demonstrate my problem when I
make my example shorter.
Best wishes,
Stefan
Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2009, 00:33 + schrieb Graham Percival:
Please send a tiny example.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.12.3. This
version contains the long-awaited fix for our GUI on MacOS X 10.5
and 10.6. In addition to the GUI fixes, this version contains
dozens of bugfixes backported from the unstable development
version.
We recommend that all users upgrade
Please send a tiny example.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/tiny-examples
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:12:26AM +0100, stefankaegi wrote:
Hi
It seems I have a problem with pedal in bracket style. Please check out
the files I send with this mail. Actually there
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Mats Bengtsson
mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
- At http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/learning#Learning, I
find the formulation in Read it: read this manual in the same format as
this one. very confusing.
I'm trying to explain the difference
Are you sure? This problem was fixed recently; numerous people
reported that it worked well, and nobody said that it didn't work.
What version, exactly, are you using?
- Graham
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:20:08PM -0800, aliteralmind wrote:
Actually, no. It was to uninstall the LATEST version
) )
--
From: Graham Percival
Sent: Sun 20/12/2009 20:26
To: aliteralmind
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Very very slow Lilypond uninstall on Windows
Are you sure? This problem was fixed recently
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Actually, the current installation instructions are almost
over-emphasized on the current web page. These steps are the
same as for almost any other Windows application so I'm not
convinced we need to comment on them.
That's
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Think of a Windows user who wants to try LilyPond. She will click on
Download, quickly locate the Windows logo and click on that and probably
miss the Note: ... at the top of this intermediate page.
Good point; I've added the
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
At the Windows download page, I would propose to remove all the current
information, except the link to the installer, and replace it by the
nice introduction with screen-shots. At the bottom of the page, you can
add links
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:09:26AM +1100, Nick Payne wrote:
The foot-separation variable that can be used in the \paper block
doesn't seem to have any effect. It's documented in the 2.13.9 NR as:
Yes, we know. The spacing variables have changed. No, the
documentation hasn't been updated
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:34:26AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
No. The alternate input page is extremely easy to find.
With all due respect, you may be missing the point here.
I haven't missed the point
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:50PM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
If you can suggest an improvement, especially in the
Introduction pages, please do.
LilyPondTool, Frescobaldi, Emacs and Vim are listed under
Alternate Input. Since this link is to the right of Text
Input, the implication
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:59:17AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Kees van den Doel kvand...@shaw.ca writes:
Of course there is nothing really wrong with the current website.
Most people will want to just download lilypond and try it out; who
has time to read all the crap on a product's
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:41:00AM +0100, Gilles THIBAULT wrote:
Does anybody know anything more about this issue? Does some piece of
software need an upgrade?
Well, i have never understood why the LSR cannot compile the snippet
( http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=615 ) .
I supposed that
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:00:57AM -0800, -Eluze wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/development#Development
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/development#Development
on this page clicking *Manuals* in the top note leads to the 2.12.2 manuals,
whereas
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:36:57AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/12/18 Federico Bruni brunol...@gmx.com:
Il 18/12/2009 00:57, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Pretend that you've never heard of lilypond. Does the webpage
answer the questions, or present the information, that you wanted
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/12/18 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Hmm, on second thought, what about calling it Easier editing?
That alliterates, so it gets a 20% bonus to its attractiveness. :)
I often call them Improved Environments
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Quoting Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Thanks, I missed that! I'll add this to my TODO.
I hope you also know that you end up at the 2.13 manual if you click on
the quick link to the Manuals 2.12.2 on the main page
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Valentin Villenave
v.villen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote:
I would like to see options on the download page:
- Download LilyPond with LilyPondTool (needs Java installed)
-
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Kees van den Doel kvand...@shaw.ca wrote:
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Valentin Villenave
No. The alternate input page is extremely easy to find.
recommended editors are right at the top of that page
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 05:47:49PM -0600, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Kees van den Doel kvand...@shaw.ca
wrote:
Of course, most people do not know what an editor is, except
as some guy that puts articles
Add space with an invisible rest:
s4 or s2
Text below staff: the cheap way is c4_text.
Both are fairly easy to find the docs.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Fredrik Carlén norderg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! I am trying to mimick the appearance of the -- for drummers --
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Federico Bruni brunol...@gmx.com wrote:
Il 15/12/2009 12:22, Philip Potter ha scritto:
Please keep all discussion on list - the easiest way to do this is to
click Reply All and ensure that lilypond-user@gnu.org is in the To:
or Cc: list.
I recently realized
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 00:56:16 schrieb Joe Neeman:
Thanks for the reminder; I still need to rewrite these sections.
Plus, we need convert-ly rules!
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=911
Yes, it does have a gui. However, this gui is broken in 2.12.2.
I've been working on 2.12.3 for a while.
I could have released 2.12.3 literally MONTHS ago if more people
helped with lilypond development. Remember, when I'm working on
the website text or documentation issues, I'm not working on
Yes, that is exactly what we already have.
Screenshots are here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/learning/macos-x
- Graham
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Kees van den Doel kvand...@shaw.ca wrote:
I was thinking of something utterly trivial with as few features as possible
As mentioned in the release message, users are strongly recommended to
use 2.12.2, not 2.13. We will let you know when we think that 2.13.x
is ready for users to test.
Cheers,
- Graham
2009/12/12 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng hhpmu...@163.com:
Sorry, Since the bad frustrating Midi tie problem persists, I
LilyPond 2.13.9 is now out. From 2.13.9 onwards, LilyPond is
licensed under the GNU GPL v3+ for code, and the GNU FDL 1.3+ for
documentation. In addition to the usual round of bugfixes, this
release adds a shortcut for repeated chords.
Please note that the 2.13 series is an UNSTABLE DEVELOPMENT
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:08:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Maybe one would need a standard test suite template with multiple
voices, input methods, repeats and midi output, and any new feature that
gets moved into core needs to get this template expanded into the test
suite, and every test
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 03:16:37AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de wrote:
In exchange, I just did the finishing touches on the following two snippets:
:-)
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=650
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:50:32AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng hhpmu...@163.com writes:
Then here's a visual
problem: When I set the line-count to 3, will the clef position 0 be
the middle line?
Wouldn't trying it out help?
That's easy for people who can see, but
This list is fine, although technically I guess the bug-lilypond
list is the best place. We're working on the website build system
issues, so hopefully the link will be fixed soon.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:24:20PM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
The link to Building documentation
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:41:06PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 12/2/09 2:58 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Because it's too many things to list in the body of the NR. We try to keep
the body of the NR as short as feasible, and put exhaustive lists in the
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 05:33:55AM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
Hadn't realized that a policy of
collateral damage was allowed. Given your approach to testing (and
your experience) this should work as well as more conservative
approaches.
As Alexander wrote, it's not so much that collateral
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:57:00PM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
Pardon the length of the piece of code, but clearly demonstrates the
problem where as other pieces don't (got to be a page long for
instance...):
\version 2.13.7
I hope that you realize that 2.13.7 is an UNSTABLE, DEVELOPMENT
501 - 600 of 2971 matches
Mail list logo
