Ian Kelling wrote:
> I looked into the missing mail, couldn't find it.
Thanks for looking into this problem.
> Please report any future missing emails. Usually we can figure it
> out.
Seconded. If you are having problems with any of the mailing lists
please report it. There are 1,500+ mailing
Bob Proulx writes:
> I have been reading the thread about lost emails to the list. Perhaps
> I can help communicate the goings on that happens out of sight. This
> message is a little long. If not interested in how email and mailing
> lists work then please feel free to skip
Am 25.10.2017 um 05:58 schrieb Bob Proulx:
At the Mailman layer if the sender address has not posted to the
mailing before then the message will be held for moderation. This
only happens *once* for the *first* messages from a new address until
the modertors approve it. After that point
On 10/24/2017 10:58 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Perhaps I can help communicate the goings on that happens out of sight.
Thank you! That was very informative. By examining message headers, I
had formed some assumptions about how the Gnu Lists message flow is
structured, and it was nice to have them
I have been reading the thread about lost emails to the list. Perhaps
I can help communicate the goings on that happens out of sight. This
message is a little long. If not interested in how email and mailing
lists work then please feel free to skip it.
Karlin High wrote:
> Robert Schmaus
David Wright wrote:
So the question is why your Message-ID:
<2914e16a-e129-19ca-4fc2-b3a552123...@dabble.ch>
didn't arrive on the list. Perhaps the spam scan produced a false
positive. Has this started happening within the past year? I notice
that your postings are submitted slightly
On Mon 23 Oct 2017 at 11:10:23 (+0200), Robin Bannister wrote:
> Karlin High wrote:
>
> >Curiouser and curiouser. The part that bugs me the worst is when I do
> >a Reply-All and the message never appears on the list, but then the
> >other recipients of my message ALSO do a Reply-All, and have
Karlin High wrote:
Curiouser and curiouser. The part that bugs me the worst is when I do
a Reply-All and the message never appears on the list, but then the
other recipients of my message ALSO do a Reply-All, and have their
replies to my message get posted to list, making it seem that my
On 10/19/2017 4:48 PM, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Did you try my suggestion from earlier in the thread, did it help in
Thunderbird?
Just now; we'll see what happens. But since Thunderbird is out of the
picture after the message arrives at smtp.gmail.com... dunno. We'll see.
--
Karlin High
On Thu 19 Oct 2017 at 17:33:08 (+0200), Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> Am 19.10.2017 um 15:04 schrieb Wols Lists:
> > And again, I don't think it applies here, don't forget some lists will
> > look at the distribution list on the incoming mail, and not send the
> > outgoing message to those addresses.
Karlin High wrote
> Anyway, the Gmail web interface has never had delivery trouble here so
> far. I'll be fine. But for the moment, I think people who make
> multiple postings or apparently off-list conversations should be given
> some extra grace.
> --
> Karlin High
> Missouri, USA
Karlin,
Did
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
>> is anyone else using Thunderbird, and never having any
>> lost messages at all?
>
> I do, and I haven't ever lost a message to this (or indeed any) list.
>
>> If so, is your email provider something other than
>
Hi Karlin,
> But anyway, is anyone else using Thunderbird, and never having any
> lost messages at all?
I do, and I haven't ever lost a message to this (or indeed any) list.
Sometimes it took a while for it to show up but I doubt that's anything to do
with TBird.
> If so, is your email
Am 19.10.2017 um 15:04 schrieb Wols Lists:
> And again, I don't think it applies here, don't forget some lists will
> look at the distribution list on the incoming mail, and not send the
> outgoing message to those addresses. So you do not receive a copy of
> your own emails.
Actually I do receive
On 19/10/17 12:33, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
>
>
> As I started this, I would like to comment:
>
> 1. I read this list using Thunderbird, my mail server sits with
> gmx.net. When I didnot see my mail for several hours arriving on the
> list I started to worry.
Has gmx sat on the mail
Am 18.10.2017 um 18:38 schrieb Karlin High:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Bynow you should have realized that Mails to lilypond-user do not, as a
>> rule, get lost and reposting them several times does not help.
> Would that were true for some of us
On 18/10/17 17:38, Karlin High wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Bynow you should have realized that Mails to lilypond-user do not, as a
rule, get lost and reposting them several times does not help.
I was driven to switch to the Gmail web interface. I
On 18/10/17 17:38, Karlin High wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Bynow you should have realized that Mails to lilypond-user do not, as a
>> rule, get lost and reposting them several times does not help.
>
> Would that were true for some of us
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Bynow you should have realized that Mails to lilypond-user do not, as a
> rule, get lost and reposting them several times does not help.
Would that were true for some of us Thunderbird users! (Header says
that's what sent the
19 matches
Mail list logo