Am 13.12.2015 um 14:09 schrieb Graham Breed:
> On 13/12/15 12:48, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
>> Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend
>> function in
>> the spreadsheet I use to do the same thing). Those functions will
>> convert
>> the input (given as a fraction comprising
Converting cents to ratios only makes even a bit of sense if you have some
preexisting music in some temperament, which you then want to approximate
in just intonation. But even that isn't really something that would be
served by calculation from cents and not simply determining yourself what
David Kastrup wrote Monday, December 14, 2015 11:32 AM
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 13.12.2015 um 14:09 schrieb Graham Breed:
>>> On 13/12/15 12:48, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend
function in
the
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 13.12.2015 um 14:09 schrieb Graham Breed:
>> On 13/12/15 12:48, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
>>> Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend
>>> function in
>>> the spreadsheet I use to do the same thing). Those functions will
>>> convert
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, December 14, 2015 11:32 AM
>
>
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 13.12.2015 um 14:09 schrieb Graham Breed:
On 13/12/15 12:48, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
> Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry;
Am 14.12.2015 um 13:26 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh:
> Meanwhile, I'm teaching myself fontforge. And here I thought it was
> commercial software, and I already had it installed.
>
I'm not sure if that's a viable road, but it might also be a good idea
to define these stencils in metafont. This might
> On 14 Dec 2015, at 20:28, Graham Breed wrote:
>
>> From: "N. Andrew Walsh"
>
>> Converting cents to ratios only makes even a bit of sense if you have some
>> preexisting music in some temperament, which you then want to approximate
>> in just
From: "N. Andrew Walsh"
Converting cents to ratios only makes even a bit of sense if you have some
preexisting music in some temperament, which you then want to approximate
in just intonation. But even that isn't really something that would be
served by calculation
sorry. You have to switch to the just-intonation-stub branch, which is
here:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/just-intonation-stub/notation-snippets
Cheers,
A
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:13 AM, wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
> >
On 13.12.2015 13:04, Graham Breed wrote:
From: "N. Andrew Walsh"
Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been
done,
as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have
a look
in the OLL repository under notation-tools and
From: "N. Andrew Walsh"
Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been done,
as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have a look
in the OLL repository under notation-tools and you should find the .ily
files.
What's the
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
> Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been done,
> as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have a look
> in the OLL repository under notation-tools and you should find the .ily
At what URL? I'm
Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend function in
the spreadsheet I use to do the same thing). Those functions will convert
the input (given as a fraction comprising two integers) into Lily's
semitone values. That should allow you to convert between just-intonation
ratios
From: Urs Liska
>Maybe so, but the result is less portable because (if I understand
>correctly) you'd have to have a custom font and have it installed
>correctly, etc. for anyone to be able to use the glyph... as opposed
>to just having the custom glyphs in an include
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 15:55:08 +0100
"N. Andrew Walsh" wrote:
> So I've kludged around with Inkscape, and I'm attaching a few .svg files
> to show what I'm getting at. These are *very ugly*, and I would want to
> spend a good bit of time working on proportion, weighting,
See the previous message from me, which links to it and provides
instructions for its use.
Cheers,
A
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Graham Breed wrote:
> From: "N. Andrew Walsh"
>>
>
> Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, Graham Breed wrote:
> Converting from ratios to cents is easy. Converting between ratios and cents
> requires a function from cents to ratios. That's a lot more difficult because
> information is lost. You got us excited by suggesting that had been solved.
Indeed. One can
So I've kludged around with Inkscape, and I'm attaching a few .svg files to
show what I'm getting at. These are *very ugly*, and I would want to spend
a good bit of time working on proportion, weighting, etc..
However, these are the components to build any accidental within a 7-limit
system: a
On 13/12/15 12:48, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Take a look at conversions.ly (sorry; mround is the equivalend function in
the spreadsheet I use to do the same thing). Those functions will convert
the input (given as a fraction comprising two integers) into Lily's
semitone values. That should allow
Actually, coverting between the ratios and semitones has alread been done,
as there's a simple set of log and mround functions that do it. Have a look
in the OLL repository under notation-tools and you should find the .ily
files.
Cheers,
A
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 7:51 AM,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
> accidentals as needed. I suppose, rather than having Lily/Scheme calculate
> prime factors on the fly at runtime, it would be easier to have a lookup
> table of the prime factorization for each integer up to a certain limit (but
> that would end up
Hi Andrew,
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 10:38 AM, N. Andrew Walsh
> wrote:
>
> I've been doing some background work on my just-intonation accidentals, and I
> was hoping you could give me some advice on the svg-to-path translation. I
> know what the stencils should look
> Anyway, that’s how I’ve done this kind of thing. It’s not simple but it
> works!
If I understand the procedure correctly, wouldn't it be easier to use a
tool like fontforge add/adjust font glyphs?
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Am 12. Dezember 2015 23:08:53 MEZ, schrieb Paul Morris :
>> On Dec 12, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Johan Vromans
>wrote:
>>
>> If I understand the procedure correctly, wouldn't it be easier to use
>a
>> tool like fontforge add/adjust font glyphs?
>
>Maybe so,
It would not, because the accidentals I use are in an open system of just
intonation (not a fixed scale) in which *any* conceivable ratio can be
represented (so long as I have the module for its respective prime
factors). This is a serious limitation of a lot of systems, in that the
moment you
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Johan Vromans wrote:
>
> If I understand the procedure correctly, wouldn't it be easier to use a
> tool like fontforge add/adjust font glyphs?
Maybe so, but the result is less portable because (if I understand correctly)
you'd have to have a
26 matches
Mail list logo