Re: Distance of secondary beams

Am 18.01.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > Hi Abraham, > > Beam.length-fraction - thanks for uncovering this information for us. > I was never able to find this. It's really useful. So it seems like > setting the fraction to 1 gives the 'normal' distance, setting to 0 > gives no distance,

Re: Distance of secondary beams

Hi Abraham, Beam.length-fraction - thanks for uncovering this information for us. I was never able to find this. It's really useful. So it seems like setting the fraction to 1 gives the 'normal' distance, setting to 0 gives no distance, and setting to 0.5 gives half the normal distance, and so

ly:make-stencil arguments question

Hi all, I'm struggling to parametrize the creation of a stencil, and I must admit I'm totally lost with the issue of multiple level quoting/quasiquoting/unquoting. See attached file which is derived from http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=623. It uses ly:make-stencil to create a stencil from

Re: ly:make-stencil arguments question

Am 18.01.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Urs Liska: > > See attached file which is derived from > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=623. > Sorry, please *ignore* the attachment of the previous post, here's the correct one. -- u...@openlilylib.org https://openlilylib.org http://lilypondblog.org

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

> On 17 Jan 2017, at 22:42, Simon Albrecht wrote: > The question came up about a curious key signature used by Britten, which > indicates only Ab and C#, ... Mode names are listed at [1]. Compute the differences in E12: G Ab B C# D E F G 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 and make

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

Hi Harm, Am 18.01.2017 um 23:51 schrieb Thomas Morley: > The default of zero is perfectly fine for all predefined scales, imho. You are right. I ran your example and withdraw my simple approach. Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

2017-01-18 23:00 GMT+01:00 Noeck : > Wouldn't it be an improvement if there was a default padding larger than > 0? Of course, the best option would be some type of kerning which works > between all possible combinations. But something like 0.2 staff spaces > between all

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

Hi David, > There is no default setting. Padding controls the overall spacing > (with extra space allotted to naturals); you use padding-pairs to > affect certain collocations. Yes. I just think that there should be a better default than the one that was made apparent by Simon’s post

Re: Distance of secondary beams

On 01/18/2017 03:13 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: I think it needs better expressing - how does one go about submitting documentation improvement requests? If you wanted to go beyond a bug report with suggested rewording, you could submit a patch. The doc strings for grob properties like this

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > I understand that there are a huge number of possible key signatures, but > can’t the collision in the first example (does it bother anyone else?) be > "pre-fixed" somehow? > There could be a more

Padding between last system and footer

Hi, Is there a way to add some padding between the last system of the page and the footer? I have the copyright in the end of the 1st page. There doesn't seem to be a suitable spacing option in the \paper variables. There used to be a "foot-separator" in 2.11 but since then the spacing has

Re: Padding between last system and footer

Hey, Risto! On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Risto Vääräniemi-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n199318...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to add some padding between the last system of the page and > the footer? I have the copyright in the end of the 1st page. There doesn't >

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:17 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > >> >> I understand that there are a huge number of possible key signatures, but >> can’t the collision in the first

Re: Padding between last system and footer

Hi Risto, > I also must set ragged-bottom to #f to do that—not always desirable. What about adjusting ragged-last-bottom? Hope that helps, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info

Re: Padding between last system and footer

On 18 January 2017 at 19:47, tisimst wrote: > Hey, Risto! > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Risto Vääräniemi-2 [via Lilypond] <[hidden > email] > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way to add some padding between the

Re: Padding between last system and footer

Hi Risto, (p.s. that's my middle name as I was baptized!) > What if I have e.g. a 4 page score? Surely, the ragged-last-bottom only > affects the page 4, not the problematic pages 2–3? Sorry. When you said “last system”, I thought you meant of the whole score. > Adding a blank line to the

Re: Padding between last system and footer

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Risto Vääräniemi-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n199322...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > On 18 January 2017 at 19:47, tisimst <[hidden email] > > wrote: > >> Hey, Risto! >> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Risto

Re: Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Caio Giovaneti de Barros wrote: > >> The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two >> staves as required, but without the requested arrow head. >> > Man, you read my mind. I was trying to solve the exact same problem

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

Hi Simon (et al.), >> And LilyPond just has a fabulous, simple, and proper solution: > > Which is, by the way, also very well documented. But, apparently not well defaulted. ;) Where does one find the KeySignature.padding-pairs defaults? I did a file search inside the Contents folder of my

Fwd: brittenPhrygolydian

Oops. Now replying to list: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nalesnik Date: Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:41 AM Subject: Re: brittenPhrygolydian To: Kieren MacMillan On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Kieren MacMillan

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

Hey, Kieren! On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Kieren MacMillan-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n199307...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Simon (et al.), > > >> And LilyPond just has a fabulous, simple, and proper solution: > > > > Which is, by the way, also very well documented. > > But,

How does \musicMap not return music?

Hello, surely I overlooked something: I’m writing a function to truncate MMRs for rehearsal MIDI. This is the code so far: % \version "2.19.53" truncateRests = #(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?) (let ((trunc-rests (lambda (e) (if (music-is-of-type? e

Re: How does \musicMap not return music?

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello, > > surely I overlooked something: > > I’m writing a function to truncate MMRs for rehearsal MIDI. This is > the code so far: > > % > \version "2.19.53" > > truncateRests = > #(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?) >(let

Re: How does \musicMap not return music?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Simon Albrecht writes: > >> Hello, >> >> surely I overlooked something: >> >> I’m writing a function to truncate MMRs for rehearsal MIDI. This is >> the code so far: >> >> % >> \version

Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

% \version "2.19.48" \new PianoStaff <<   \set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t   \new Staff { \arpeggioArrowUp 1\arpeggio   }   \new Staff { \arpeggioArrowUp \clef "bass" 1\arpeggio   } >> % The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two

Re: How does \musicMap not return music?

On 18.01.2017 21:04, David Kastrup wrote: Its last expression should be e but instead is (if ... (ly:music-set ...)) which evaluates to*undefined* . Thanks for the info! Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: ly:make-stencil arguments question

2017-01-18 11:15 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : > > > Am 18.01.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Urs Liska: >> >> See attached file which is derived from >> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=623. >> > > Sorry, please *ignore* the attachment of the previous post, here's the > correct one. >

Re: Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two staves as required, but without the requested arrow head. Man, you read my mind. I was trying to solve the exact same problem just now. Caio ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: brittenPhrygolydian

Wouldn't it be an improvement if there was a default padding larger than 0? Of course, the best option would be some type of kerning which works between all possible combinations. But something like 0.2 staff spaces between all accidentals would probably look better than no space at all. I don't