Re: What does anyone want? (4)

For that matter, I have no idea what he's trying to say at all. It seems like just insane rambling. On 04/20/17 21:36, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:24:23PM -0400, Jeffery Shivers wrote: Hi Miroslaw, On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mirosław Doroszewski

Re: What does anyone want? (4)

Am 20.04.2017 um 20:42 schrieb Mirosław Doroszewski: Sometime ago someone has given me an advice to turn off at all computer from electric current always. Well, if we stop supplying our computers with electricity, we won’t have to worry about propagating free software anymore… :-)

Re: What does anyone want? (4)

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:24:23PM -0400, Jeffery Shivers wrote: > Hi Miroslaw, > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mirosław Doroszewski > wrote: > > [trimmed gobbledygook] > > Please stop sending this series of rambling / off-topic / distracting > messages to

Re: What does anyone want? (4)

Hi Miroslaw, On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mirosław Doroszewski wrote: > [trimmed gobbledygook] Please stop sending this series of rambling / off-topic / distracting messages to the lilypond-user list. Most people come here for help or to offer any kind of

Re: Problem with /accepts

Am 17.04.2017 um 22:06 schrieb Thomas Morley: \layout { \context { \Staff \accepts PP } %% copy "Voice"-settings, rename to "PP" \context { \Voice \name PP \alias Voice %% all engravers from Voice are present %%

Re: (unknown)

The truth is that your content does not belong on this mailing list, and you have been told so already. This mailing list's description is This list is for discussing how to use lilypond. (www.gnu.org/software/lilypond) If you don't have anything relevant to the list's purpose to

Re: is the lyric tie tweakable?

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi all, > > Is the built-in** lyric tie/elision tweakable? I’ve found that the > kerning/positioning changes fairly dramatically depending on the font being > used. I’d like to try to set its position

is the lyric tie tweakable?

Hi all, Is the built-in** lyric tie/elision tweakable? I’ve found that the kerning/positioning changes fairly dramatically depending on the font being used. I’d like to try to set its position globally (rather than having to adjust each lyric pair it appears under), but couldn’t find the

Re:

All: I'm done with these emails. I rather enjoy reading the LilyPond mailing list. I do not believe that this email is acceptable for the list. What can be done? Rachael Carlson ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re:

G'day. On 21/4/17 12:16 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote: The other way to discourage the offending behaviour is simply to laugh at him. There is no more powerful thing than Satire! :-) We could always keep it on topic and turn the discussion to notating church music... Andrew Bromage

Re: Hairpin endings

On 2017-04-20 20:42, Andrew Bernard wrote: I posted a while ago with a query about hairpins, to which no response. Would there be any way to have hairpins that don't start, or end in the other direction, with the lines converging to the same point? I have need from time to time of hairpins

Re:

Hi Rachael, Cranks like this arise from time to time. The policy of the moderator is non interference. Therefore, the best thing to do is to block messages from this sender in your email client program. Pretty much all email programs allow you to filter undesired senders individually. In my

Hairpin endings

I posted a while ago with a query about hairpins, to which no response. Would there be any way to have hairpins that don't start, or end in the other direction, with the lines converging to the same point? I have need from time to time of hairpins where the end points are still separated, rather

What does anyone want? (4)

Sometime ago someone has given me an advice to turn off at all computer from electric current always. And someday I calculate, that these who uses computers or similar devices, pays about 100,000,000,000 dollars or euro every month for bulbs (=electric lights) turned on in just computer and

Re: Discern post-event in music function

Am 20.04.2017 um 17:25 schrieb caag...@gmail.com: There's a `post-event?` predicate defined in scm/define-music-display-methods.scm. I don't think that one's easily accessible outside that module, but you can copy it: (define (post-event? m) (music-is-of-type? m 'post-event)) Here’s the

Discern post-event in music function

Hello, I currently use this implementation of the \after function: after = #(define-music-function (t e m) (ly:duration? ly:music? ly:music?) #{ \context Bottom << #m { \skip $t <> -\tweak extra-spacing-width #empty-interval $e } >> #}) Unfortunately, it doesn’t

Re: Discern post-event in music function

Am 20.04.2017 um 17:25 schrieb caag...@gmail.com: (define (post-event? m) (music-is-of-type? m 'post-event)) That’s reasonably simple :-) Thanks, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Discern post-event in music function

There's a `post-event?` predicate defined in scm/define-music-display-methods.scm. I don't think that one's easily accessible outside that module, but you can copy it: (define (post-event? m) (music-is-of-type? m 'post-event)) On 04/20/17 16:59, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello, I currently

vocalName vs. instrumentName

Hello everybody, I’m wondering: what are the historic and functional differences between vocalName and instrumentName? Are there any? Does anybody have a clever policy when to use vocalName? Does anybody use it at all? Best, Simon ___

Re: vocalName vs. instrumentName

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello everybody, > > I’m wondering: what are the historic and functional differences > between vocalName and instrumentName? vocalName/shortVocalName are fallbacks when neither instrumentName nor shortInstrumentName are set. That's all

Re: Discern post-event in music function

You could just do (let ((post (music-is-of-type? e 'post-event))) (stuff)). No point in creating a lambda for it. On 04/20/17 17:43, Simon Albrecht wrote: Am 20.04.2017 um 17:25 schrieb caag...@gmail.com: There's a `post-event?` predicate defined in scm/define-music-display-methods.scm. I

Re: Discern post-event in music function

Simon Albrecht writes: > Am 20.04.2017 um 17:25 schrieb caag...@gmail.com: >> There's a `post-event?` predicate defined in >> scm/define-music-display-methods.scm. I don't think that one's >> easily accessible outside that module, but you can copy it: >> >> (define

Re: how to get markup formatting to survive a font-name change

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Abraham, > > > The \paper block should look like this (and this should be below any > #(set-global-staff-size ...) because that resets the "fonts" variable and > you need to add to it): > > > >

Re: (unknown)

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, David Kastrup wrote: Musescore and LilyPond would be in version 2 a long time ago. LilyPond has been in version 2 for a long time already. And so has Musescore If you want to discuss how to use LilyPond, this is the right place. If not, it isn't. Adding some

[no subject]

Only telling the Truth sincerely, frankly, is powerful, helpful, hopeful. Who is telling the Truth sincerely, frankly, is powerful, helpful, hopeful — even when is telling about his/her false, powerless, helpless, hopeless, desperate — is paradoxically powerful, helpful, hopeful, and is begging

Re: (unknown)

Mirosław Doroszewski writes: > Only telling the Truth sincerely, frankly, is powerful, helpful, > hopeful. The truth is that your content does not belong on this mailing list, and you have been told so already. This mailing list's description is This list

Re: What does everyone want? (2)

Jacques Menu Muzhic writes: > Hello David, > >> LilyPond 3 could be a rework of the optimization engine doing away with >> the hard pure/unpure distinction. > > Not sure I understand this, can you tell us more? It's not a user-level distinction. LilyPond currently makes

Re: What does everyone want? (2)

Thanks David for the explanation! JM > Le 20 avr. 2017 à 08:51, David Kastrup a écrit : > > Jacques Menu Muzhic writes: > >> Hello David, >> >>> LilyPond 3 could be a rework of the optimization engine doing away with >>> the hard pure/unpure distinction.