Shockley, Gerard C wrote:
I'm at the zSeries Oracle Special Interest Group this week and Oracle
says OCSF2 is not supported and non-directional.
They say use ASM and RAC.
That means the file system is not supported to be used with the
database. The file system itself seems pretty solid to me.
Please note that OCFS2 is not supported for production use on Linux
for
System z. This is largely due to a lack of extensive enough
testing/QA
work. It should work for you, but at this time its only recommended
for
testing.
Now, if one needed to have a file system r/w from more than 1
NFSv3 or AFS are reliable for this purpose and work well. GFS
was supported for a while (before RH bought Sistina) -- might
still be available. IBM will sell you GPFS.
David: GPFS is not (yet) available for Linux on z.
Jim
NFSv3 or AFS are reliable for this purpose and work well. GFS
was supported for a while (before RH bought Sistina) -- might
still be available. IBM will sell you GPFS.
David: GPFS is not (yet) available for Linux on z.
Hmm. Guess one of the dev folks pre-announced it to a bunch of IBM
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Boyes
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:09 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: OCFS2 Setup
NFSv3 or AFS are reliable for this purpose and work well. GFS was
supported for a while (before RH bought Sistina) -- might still be
available. IBM
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:14 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Shockley, Gerard
C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm at the zSeries Oracle Special Interest Group this week and Oracle
says OCSF2 is not supported and non-directional.
They say use ASM and RAC.
That would be news to our product
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up a two node ocfs2 cluster and run it on two SLES10
SP1 guests running in two different z/VM 5.3 lpars.
The shared disk is an lvm volume comprised of 3390-3s, and I'm using the
standard disk-based heartbeat and port .
I was able to get this to work when both
on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim Fujimoto
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:49 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] OCFS2 Setup
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up a two node ocfs2 cluster and run it on two SLES10
SP1 guests running in two different z/VM 5.3 lpars
Jim Fujimoto wrote:
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up a two node ocfs2 cluster and run it on two SLES10
SP1 guests running in two different z/VM 5.3 lpars.
The shared disk is an lvm volume comprised of 3390-3s, and I'm using the
standard disk-based heartbeat and port .
I was able to get this
.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim Fujimoto
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 10:49 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] OCFS2 Setup
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up a two node ocfs2 cluster and run it on two SLES10
SP1 guests
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:48 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim Fujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up a two node ocfs2 cluster and run it on two SLES10
SP1 guests running in two different z/VM 5.3 lpars.
Please note that OCFS2 is not supported for production
Mark wrote:
Please note that OCFS2 is not supported for production use on Linux for
System z. This is largely due to a lack of extensive enough testing/QA
work. It should work for you, but at this time its only recommended for
testing.
Now, if one needed to have a file system r/w from more
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:34 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Now, if one needed to have a file system r/w from more than 1 linux
server on z, what would the current supported recommendation be? And is
anyone doing such with MQ Series?
At this
13 matches
Mail list logo
