Thank you...
Ray
On 3/25/2017 13:52, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 03/22/2017 01:06 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 03/22/2017 12:51 PM, Ray Mansell wrote:
Thank you all for the information. It would appear we are stuck with 32
CPUs for the moment and, since I'm retiring at the end of next
On 03/22/2017 01:06 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 12:51 PM, Ray Mansell wrote:
>> Thank you all for the information. It would appear we are stuck with 32
>> CPUs for the moment and, since I'm retiring at the end of next week, I
>> guess my replacement will have to decide how to
On 03/22/2017 12:51 PM, Ray Mansell wrote:
> Thank you all for the information. It would appear we are stuck with 32
> CPUs for the moment and, since I'm retiring at the end of next week, I
> guess my replacement will have to decide how to proceed :-)
>
> Thanks again,
> Ray
As a last duty, can
Thank you all for the information. It would appear we are stuck with 32
CPUs for the moment and, since I'm retiring at the end of next week, I
guess my replacement will have to decide how to proceed :-)
Thanks again,
Ray
On 3/21/2017 18:46, Mark Post wrote:
On 3/21/2017 at 06:32 PM, Ray
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> I just looked at one of my SLES12 test systems, and we have
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256 specified, so I'm guessing having a lot of headroom
> won't cause any problems.
I agree,
Ubuntu has the same 256 and IIRC RH as well.
I think
>>> On 3/21/2017 at 06:32 PM, Ray Mansell wrote:
> cat /proc/cmdline
> root=/dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.9207-part3 BOOT_IMAGE=0
>
> Can this be modified to allow >32 CPUs?
If Christian is right (and he almost certainly is), then the only thing that
will allow you to have more
On 3/21/2017 17:38, Mark Post wrote:
What does /proc/cmdline show for the kernel parms?
Mark Post
cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.9207-part3 BOOT_IMAGE=0
Can this be modified to allow >32 CPUs?
Many thanks for your help,
Ray
On 03/21/2017 09:05 PM, Ray Mansell wrote:
> We've been running some beefy Debian servers, but of course one of them
> was not beefy enough, and we were asked if we could increase the number
> of CPUs from 32 to 48. Easy, I thought, until I rebooted the beefier
> server only to discover it had
>>> On 3/21/2017 at 04:05 PM, Ray Mansell wrote:
> We've been running some beefy Debian servers, but of course one of them
> was not beefy enough, and we were asked if we could increase the number
> of CPUs from 32 to 48. Easy, I thought, until I rebooted the beefier
> server