Crispin Hugo
One of our developers here wants a copy of suse 8 s390 or s390x. We only
have suse 9 installed here. I can't find this on Novell site. Any ideas
please
This email has been scanned for all known viruses
a copy of suse 8 s390 or s390x. We only
have suse 9 installed here. I can't find this on Novell site. Any ideas
please
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security Service and the Macro 4
: Dominic Coulombe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2006 18:41
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 8
Hi Hugo,
SLES8 31 bits :
SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8 for IBM S/390 and IBM zSeries CD images s390
(29-Nov-02)
http://download.novell.com/Download?buildid=pkawhuQ-dHs~http
for informational purposes and should not be construed as a
solicitation, offer or acceptance of any offer.
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Coulombe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2006 18:41
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 8
Hi Hugo,
SLES8 31 bits :
SuSE Linux Enterprise
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 8
Ok, so let's try this :
http://support.novell.com/linux/psdb/Archive_ISO.html
On 7/10/06, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cheers Dominic,
But I get NoSuchBuildException when I try either of these URL's
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro
Message-
From: Dominic Coulombe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2006 19:58
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 8
Ok, so let's try this :
http://support.novell.com/linux/psdb/Archive_ISO.html
On 7/10/06, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cheers Dominic,
But I get
disk is a problem with another sandbox box install.
Regards
Gerard
-Original Message-
From: Ranga Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2005 06:14 PM
To: Ceruti, Gerard G
Cc: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
Gerard:
I dont remember
: 714-442-2840
Ceruti, Gerard G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/20/2005 02:34 AM
To
'Ranga Nathan' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
FW: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
Hi Nathan
I am hoping you are able to remember what you did to resolve the problem
mentioned below , as I am in the same boat.
Many
Hi all ,
This is the first message that I am writing to this list .
So my question is :
How can I use more than 2 GB of RAM to a linuxGuest in a zVM 4.4 . We
are making some teste with Oracle 9i and the system only recognize 2 GB
of memory .
Any one can help ?
--
Saulo Augusto Silva
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Using more than 2GB in a Suse 8 31 bits
Hi all ,
This is the first message that I am writing to this list .
So my question is :
How can I use more than 2 GB of RAM to a linuxGuest in a zVM 4.4 . We are
making some teste with Oracle 9i and the system only recognize 2 GB
SuSE 8 31 bit Linux can only address 2 gigabytes of real memory. So not
only do you more than likely need oracle 10G, you need SuSE 8.x 64 bit
Linux to be able to give oracle 10G more than 2 gigs of real in the first
place.
Little, Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Exactly right. Thanks for clarifying.
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:54 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Using more than 2GB in a SuSE 8 31 bits
SuSE 8 31 bit Linux can only address 2 gigabytes of real memory
then, if you do have the requirement to use large SGAs, then you have to
run directly on LPAR for that z/Linux machine.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/01/05 9:53 AM
SuSE 8 31 bit Linux can only address 2 gigabytes of real memory. So not
only do you more than likely need oracle
: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:54 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Using more than 2GB in a SuSE 8 31 bits
SuSE 8 31 bit Linux can only address 2 gigabytes of real memory. So not
only do you more than likely need oracle 10G, you need SuSE 8.x 64 bit Linux
to be able to give oracle 10G more
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Using more than 2GB in a SuSE 8 31 bits
Also, Oracle 9 has a SGA limit of about 750MBs. There are some tricks to
get it up to around 900 MBs. With that restriction, it is difficult to get
Oracle to actually need the full 2GB that 31 bit addressing can give.
But if you do go
:15 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Using more than 2GB in a SuSE 8 31 bits
Also, Oracle 9 has a SGA limit of about 750MBs. There are some tricks to
get it up to around 900 MBs. With that restriction, it is difficult to get
Oracle to actually need the full 2GB that 31 bit addressing
I had originally installed SuSE 8 on our prodution VM, and just recently
decided to move it to the IFL. I just shut down Linux, DDR'd the volumes
to volumes defined for our IFL, and brought it up there. The only thing to
do now, is to change the Network Configuration. The problem I am having
to
192.168.2.2, and save the original file as ifcfg-eth0.old.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Kaba
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:14 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Reconfiguring Network for SuSE 8 running in IFL
I
ed - a line mode editor.
1,$l - list the file
s/original/new/g - change all occurrences of original to new
w - write the file
q - quit it
-Original Message-
I had originally installed SuSE 8 on our prodution VM, and just recently
decided to move it to the IFL. I just shut down Linux
On Feb 11, 2005, at 10:13 AM, John Kaba wrote:
I had originally installed SuSE 8 on our prodution VM, and just
recently
decided to move it to the IFL. I just shut down Linux, DDR'd the
volumes
to volumes defined for our IFL, and brought it up there. The only
thing to
do now, is to change
:14 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Reconfiguring Network for SuSE 8 running in IFL
I had originally installed SuSE 8 on our prodution VM, and just recently
decided to move it to the IFL. I just shut down Linux, DDR'd the volumes
to volumes defined for our IFL, and brought it up
] On Behalf Of John
Kaba
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:14 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Reconfiguring Network for SuSE 8 running in IFL
I had originally installed SuSE 8 on our prodution VM, and just recently
decided to move it to the IFL. I just shut down Linux, DDR'd the volumes
, February 01, 2005 6:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Suse 8
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it's possible to run SUSE Enterpreise Server 8 under
a
not G5/G6
machine. We are getting some error messages during install from script
LINUXRC.
Suse documentation tells to run only in G5
On Feb 2, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Mckay Ian wrote:
Hi,
if the error message is something like
/linuxrc: line xx: 17 Illegal instructioncp -ax / newroot
then we saw this on some of the older Amdahl Millennium processors that
didn't have IEEE Hardware.
We believe the stock SuSe SLES8 kernel has the
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it's possible to run SUSE Enterpreise Server 8 under a
not G5/G6
machine. We are getting some error messages during install from script
LINUXRC.
Suse documentation tells to run only in G5/G6 or later machines.
Any SUSE 8 running in G4?
Thanks in advance
Carlos
on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
390 Port cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU Subject
Suse 8
02/01/2005 01:50
PM
On Feb 1, 2005, at 1:13 PM, Doug Fairobent wrote:
My recollection is that Linux requires IEEE floating point, a feature
not
available on pre-G5 machines.
It's actually the halfword immediate stuff, which is present on later
G2 machines.
I know that recent Debians won't boot on my P/390 (a G2) but
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 04:55:15PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded to SuSE 8 shortly after installing version 7 and I was told that
I had to do a new install to version 8. I don't care if that was/is true,
but can someone tell me if there is an upgrade migration path from version
8
I upgraded to SuSE 8 shortly after installing version 7 and I was told that
I had to do a new install to version 8. I don't care if that was/is true,
but can someone tell me if there is an upgrade migration path from version
8 to version 9 and how effective is it?
Doug
There is and it worked fine (at least during the beta).
-Original Message-
I upgraded to SuSE 8 shortly after installing version 7 and I was told that
I had to do a new install to version 8. I don't care if that was/is true,
but can someone tell me if there is an upgrade migration path
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Post, Mark K wrote:
I don't know what traditional method you're talking about that did
dependency checking.
Ranga, are you referring simply to autoconf? Sure, the packager of
Product A should be making sure that the configure script ends up checking
for all of the
: Re: SuSE 8 - package installation or build from targz?
-snip-
Give it a go, RPM is not really very scary.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU Subject
Re: SuSE 8 - package installation
or build from targz?
07/19/2004 02:41
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ranga
Nathan
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 - package installation or build from targz?
Figured that much. However the traditional method also checks for
dependencies, in all the cases I have come across. RPMs dont
I have a general question. Has anyone encountered problems installing
software from tar.gz files taking the ./configure, make, make install
route?
I am encountering annoying problems with rpms due to dependencies. I am
not comfortable with it and I am not sure what it is doing under the
covers.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Ranga Nathan
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 8:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE 8 - package installation or build from targz?
I have a general question. Has anyone encountered problems installing
software from tar.gz files taking the ./configure, make, make
05:38 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: SuSE 8 - package installation or build from
targz?
RPM is the tool used for system maintenance on many Linux distributions.
Use it. Those dependencies are there for a reason
Hi,
Omitting of c did the trick. Thank you very much. But when you install
oracle on Sles8, do not forget, that cc is not installed by default.
Josef
a problem. The data
is expanded, and put in the various directories. I tried the same
procedure on Suse 8, but when it try the cpio command, it runs for a few
minutes, and then says cpio: premature end of file
I sent the .gz file to the Suse 7 again, and issued the gunzip on it
there. I then ftpd
Do you think the cpio command has changed, or is the file being
altered in
the ftp process to Suse 8? Is it due to the original .cpio.gz
file
being created on a Suse 7 system, and then being rebuilt under a Suse
8
system?
This should work. Have you run md5sum on the ftp'ed file
try doing it without the c option. i had a problem with this recently and
that did the trick.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Vance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cpio and Suse 8
Hi,
I have yet another question
Thanks to those who gave me pointers about the installation.
After I re-partitioned, mounted (I finally figured out I only have to
highlight and PRESS ENTER on the partition to mount and format!) and
installed a minimal graphics system, everything went fine.
I have a couple of questions:
1.
]
Subject: SuSE 8 on OS/390
Thanks to those who gave me pointers about the installation.
After I re-partitioned, mounted (I finally figured out I only have to
highlight and PRESS ENTER on the partition to mount and format!) and
installed a minimal graphics system, everything went fine.
I have
, or taking any action based on it, is
strictly prohibited.
-Original Message-
From: Ranga Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
We have completed the SuSE 8 installation on an LPAR. But we
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/19/2003 12:11 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
Hard wait code 000F usually means that the volume
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Ranga Nathan
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
We have completed the SuSE 8 installation on an LPAR. But we are not able
to IPL. It goes into wait status. Looks like the bootstrap is missing.
We
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Ranga Nathan
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
-snip-
We thought that was the problem. We checked. Our consultant tells us
--
From: Mark Post
Reply To: Linux on 390 Port
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 Installation problem on z800
I would recommend re-IPLing from your boot tape. Then, once the system is
up
1. insmod dasd_mod dasd=2300
of my
degradations.
Thanks Everyone for Responding,
Al Schilla
State of Minnesota
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: suse 8 guestlan poor response, dropped packets
IPLs are typically only
.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alan Schilla
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] suse 8 guestlan poor response,
dropped packets
Well we cycled VM for the cdt/cst time change and so far
performance?
Thanks For the Info,
Al Schilla
State of Minnesota
-Original Message-
From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: suse 8 guestlan poor response, dropped packets
We're in the middle
Message-
From: Alan Schilla [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: suse 8 guestlan poor response, dropped packets
My problems are huge at this time. I have problems editing a file within
my
Linux SLES8 environment without
17:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: suse 8 guestlan poor response, dropped packets
We usually IPL VM once a month, mostly just to keep the operators in
practice, although we IPLed last weekend during one of our three times a
year maintenance windows, and we will IPL for the time change
, Toronto Transit Commission
Sent: 24 October 2003 17:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: suse 8 guestlan poor response, dropped packets
We usually IPL VM once a month, mostly just to keep the operators in
practice, although we IPLed last weekend during one of our three times a
year maintenance
We are running a number of qdio qeth guest lans that are experencing very
poor response. While accessing these servers via putty SSH I will drop
connection often. Sometimes within 5 minute intervals. I when so far as to
try ping 1000 from an iptables guest lan server that front-ends an apache
experiencing ping times of 600-3000
ms. until the instance is rebooted.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alan Schilla
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LINUX-390] suse 8 guestlan poor response, dropped
Our network problems are not quite as dire as my last message stated. We
are experiencing intermittent network problems in what seems to be a
random sampling of our images . Interactive sessions with affected
images begin to drag and, when pinged, they seem to drop the first few
packets. The
-
From: Richard Hitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 /etc/hosts.deny and CIDR
Hi, Michael
Did you really mean 192.168.0.0/18 and not 192.168.0.0/16? The first would
only deny 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.63.255, if I'm
addressing format supported for /etc/hosts.deny in SuSE 8?
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer
Internal Revenue Service - Room 6030
Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Voice: (202) 927-4188 FAX: (202) 622-6726
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
to
be blocked.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Coffin Michael C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 /etc/hosts.deny and CIDR
Hi Mark,
Hmmm, that's interesting. My definition for sendmail in inetd.conf
192.168. as your addresses to
be blocked.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Coffin Michael C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 /etc/hosts.deny and CIDR
Hi Mark,
Hmmm, that's interesting. My definition
, rather than assume, I would use the second format.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Coffin Michael C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 8 /etc/hosts.deny and CIDR
Hi Mark,
I had read the hosts_access man page
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Coffin Michael C wrote:
Hi Mark,
I had read the hosts_access man page but was/am still unclear. My example
of blocking 192.168. was just an example by the way (which was probably too
simple), I actually want to use CIDR addressing to block PARTS of networks,
not
Hi Folks,
Can you use CIDR addressing in /etc/hosts.deny? This is SuSE 8 by the way.
I've got a statement in hosts.deny which reads:
ALL: 192.168.0.0/18
to reject everything from 192.168. (actual IP's are different) but an IP
address in that range was allowed to connect to my SMTP server
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE 8 /etc/hosts.deny and CIDR
Hi Folks,
Can you use CIDR addressing in /etc/hosts.deny? This is SuSE 8 by the way.
I've got a statement in hosts.deny which reads:
ALL: 192.168.0.0/18
to reject everything from 192.168. (actual IP's are different) but an IP
? This is SuSE 8 by the way.
I've got a statement in hosts.deny which reads:
ALL: 192.168.0.0/18
to reject everything from 192.168. (actual IP's are different) but an IP
address in that range was allowed to connect to my SMTP server. Shouldn't
tcpwrappers have blocked it?
Michael Coffin, VM Systems
I'm not sure where to look to debug this problem.
I've been testing Suse 8. We have been on Suse 7 for about a year.
When I install Suse 8, it connects to VM's TCP/IP machine and runs just
fine. This is z/VM 4.2 btw. However, when I cycle Linux, it doesn't
connect back to IP.
But, if I cycle
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Suse 8 TCP/IP timeouts during boot
I'm not sure where to look to debug this problem.
I've been testing Suse 8. We have been on Suse 7 for about a year.
When I install Suse 8, it connects to VM's TCP/IP
, it should get you going again. After a few attempts, perhaps.
If
you're lucky today.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Tom Duerbusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Suse 8 TCP/IP timeouts during boot
I'm not sure where
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suse 8 TCP/IP timeouts during boot
You are right, in both cases.
Stopping the IP device and starting it again worked, at least the first
time.
I do plan on moving to IUCV. But during the initial testing, I'm
keeping the things I have control over, the same as I had
On Wed, 28 May 2003 13:03:41 -0400 Post, Mark K said:
I have this exact same problem on one of my SuSE systems that I upgraded to
a 2.4.19 kernel. I switched to IUCV instead. If you don't want to go with
Guest LANS (and you _really_ should), IUCV is the better way to go than CTC.
They're both
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Suse 8 TCP/IP timeouts during boot
I'm not sure where to look to debug this problem.
I've been testing Suse 8. We have been on Suse 7 for about a year.
When I install Suse 8, it connects to VM's TCP/IP machine
On Wednesday, 05/28/2003 at 01:19 EDT, Aria Bamdad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you setup guest lans if you want to use IP addresses for the
linux guests that are not private addresses? What I mean is if you
VM host is on 1.2.3.x subnet and you want the linux guests served by
the VM TCPIP
On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:09:59 -0400 Alan Altmark said:
Use NAT in the gateway to handle the translation. Or wait for z/VM 4.4.
I am at 4.3 now. Can the VM stack do NAT? I did see some documents on this
but it involved using a linux guest as the router.
How do you setup guest lans if you want to use IP addresses for the
linux guests that are not private addresses? What I mean is if you
VM host is on 1.2.3.x subnet and you want the linux guests served by
the VM TCPIP to be on the same 1.2.3.x subnet, how is it done? I thought
the guest lans had
On Wednesday, 05/28/2003 at 03:14 EDT, Aria Bamdad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:09:59 -0400 Alan Altmark said:
Use NAT in the gateway to handle the translation. Or wait for z/VM
4.4.
I am at 4.3 now. Can the VM stack do NAT? I did see some documents on
this
but it
Their nopart-stat patch mucks it up. I can get around it, but I was just
wondering if anyone knew the right way to do it.
Thanks much,
Leland
77 matches
Mail list logo
