-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
snip
Now my question is, does (or can) gpg on zLinux use the crypto hardware?
I guess I would test it.
1) Run a test without a Crypto processor assigned to the LPAR/Guest and
monitor the CPU while runing GPG on a number of
).
Regards,
Jose
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 6:18 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: pgp vs gpg
For PGP check out Patrick Townsend Associates. They had a vendor
spotlight in the last issue of the zJournal.
Tom
Hello!
Brandon Darbro wrote:
...
Now my question is, does (or can) gpg on zLinux use the crypto hardware?
I checked the gpg sources and the answer is no. To utilize crypto hardware
on z (CPACF or crypto cards) you have to call functions provided by libica.
libica is available with the
anyone looked at pkware ??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for the use of the
We are now looking at sending some bank data to Bank of America over the
public Internet.
BOA supports pgp.
We have gpg, after all, it's freeG.
My position is, well, let's try it.
But it is getting bogged down with technical people that are not
technical in this area.
My belief is gpg is,
For PGP check out Patrick Townsend Associates. They had a vendor
spotlight in the last issue of the zJournal.
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
We are now looking at sending some bank data to Bank of America over the
public Internet.
BOA supports pgp.
We have gpg, after all, it's freeG.
My position is,
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
We are now looking at sending some bank data to Bank of America over the
public Internet.
BOA supports pgp.
We have gpg, after all, it's freeG.
My position is, well, let's try it.
But it is getting bogged down with technical people that are not
technical in this area.
My
My belief is gpg is, perhaps a couple years behind pgp as far as
features go. Unless we need the newer/better features, we can stay
with
gpg. Of course, if one of the sites requires xxx bit encription,
and if
gpg doesn't support that, well, we may end up buying a copy of pgp.
It's
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:33:25AM -0500, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
My impression is that gpg is basically the same as pgp with the
exception that gpg is fully in the public domain.
GnuPG is not in the public domain, it is copyrighted by the Free Software
Foundation and licensed under the GPL.
