Re: Why not IBM's Linux

2002-01-22 Thread Florian La Roche
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:49:06PM -0500, David Boyes wrote: Why isn't anyone discussing going with IBM's ThinkBlue version of Linux, especially looking at 64-bit implementations? ThinkBlue's actually a separate company, not at all part of IBM. Wrt to 64 bit, there really aren't that

Re: YaST will abort

2002-01-22 Thread Moloko Monyepao
I am installing Redhat Linux 7.2 downloaded from the ftp siteon an LPAR. The following is the error I get when I bootup: VSF: cannot open root device or 01:00 Please append a correct root= boot option kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root FS on 01:00 Thanx Moloko

Re: OSA FDDI

2002-01-22 Thread Carlos Ordonez
Moloko, we used an OSA FDDI with a customer in PR but they had it in LCS mode. Carlos :-) Great minds think for themselves! Carlos A. Ordonez IBM Corporation Server Consolidation |-+-- | | Moloko Monyepao| | |

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Michael Megson
Mark, Have a look at IBM's offering. They will provide an LPAR with a configured LINUX (SUSE is one of the options) for you to evaluate We have one and it is a good first step. Mick Megson -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Post, Mark K

Re: RedHat 7.2 and LVM

2002-01-22 Thread Coffin Michael C
Hi Phil, I'm planning on implementing LVM and wasn't aware that there were an instabilities. Can you comment on what instabilities exist at this time? Are they platform (S/390) specific? Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer Internal Revenue Service - Room 6030 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Re: OSA FDDI

2002-01-22 Thread Moloko Monyepao
I really want to use it. Can you please if possible tell me how can I get it working, it doesn't matter even if is in LCS mode as long as it is working. Please assist Thanx Moloko -Original Message- From: Carlos Ordonez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 January 2002 14:42 To:

Re: RedHat 7.2 and LVM

2002-01-22 Thread Ferguson, Neale
We have several CVS servers running on Linux/390 that use LVM and I've not heard of any problems. The network traffic I've seen indicates that they're successfully serving GBs of data. -Original Message- Hi Phil, I'm planning on implementing LVM and wasn't aware that there were an

Re: Managing Linux guests under z/VM

2002-01-22 Thread Coffin Michael C
Cool - I'll have to get my hands on a copy and see what it does. :) Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer Internal Revenue Service - Room 6030 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C.  20224 Voice: (202) 927-4188   FAX:  (202) 622-6726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Joachim Schroeder
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, David Boyes wrote: SuSE still offers a $4.500 evaluation version, which comes with the full service of the full product. While that's nice, that's still a far cry from the $150 you charged for the previous release, and I'm quite capable of providing my own support.

OT: Brother, can you spare a compile/test cycle?

2002-01-22 Thread David Boyes
I'm currently working on porting the Globus distributed computing tools, and one of the systems I need to include in a computing grid is a OS/390 box. Unfortunately, this box does not have a C compiler. Do any of you folks have some spare cycles to run a fairly large compile and test run on a

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread John Summerfield
MS Office (and Lotus Smartsuite among others) proved him wrong. I should have added he had the OS/2 market almost to himself. The OS/2 version of SS had an appalling reputation, and Office? What Office? The principal choices were Windows versions of WP, Office and SS, or Describe. -- Cheers

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, David Boyes wrote: Even further -- the $150 media kit for SuSE 7.0 was something that most places could buy without Acts of God or accountants -- even within the reac h of someone's private wallet if push came to shove. That got them a lot of visibility.

Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Coffin Michael C
Hi Mike, I heard that the SuSE 7.2 distribution (which includes a mandatory service contract!) is around $15,000! I don't mind paying $100 for CD's (even though it's WAY too much), but $15,000 for the $10 CD's and $14,990 for service I don't want - that's a pretty hard sell to management who

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Marcel Foortjes
Everyone, thanks a lot for your great response on this topic online and offline. This realy helps me to get prepared. Met vriendelijke groet, Marcel Foortjes Systeem beheerder / Afdeling Mainframe beheer De Amersfoortse. De Inkomensverzekeraar. Stadsring 15, 3811 HM Amersfoort Postbus 42, 3800

Upgrading Linux

2002-01-22 Thread Miller, Ila
I have installed SuSe Linux on a S/390 partition. In November of 2000 I went to ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/s390/suse-us-s390 and got the three files to make a boot of the installation system and the three ISO images. They are SuSe Linux 2.2.16. I would like to put the current Linux on my S/390

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Phil Payne
MS Office (and Lotus Smartsuite among others) proved him wrong. I should have added he had the OS/2 market almost to himself. The OS/2 version of SS had an appalling reputation, and Office? What Office? The principal choices were Windows versions of WP, Office and SS, or Describe. You

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Post, Mark K
Mick, You are referring to the Linux Community Development System, and I do have an instance there. That environment is relatively restrictive, compared to what I can do at my own site, and is intended primarily for people who don't have access to their own S/390 or zSeries hardware. And guess

Re: Why not IBM's Linux

2002-01-22 Thread Steve Guthrie
Hey, I'm a sales guy, not a droid:-). I've installed Unix system around the world. I was the engineer, the programmer, the trainer and the cable guy. I can sell, too. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gregg C Levine Sent: Monday, January

Re: Why not IBM's Linux

2002-01-22 Thread Gregg C Levine
Hello from Gregg C Levine normally with Jedi Knight Computers Did I imply explicitly that anyone on this list, is a member of the list, as a group, is indeed a member of the same crowd that R2D2, and C3P0, belong to? Of course not. I was referring to a specific salesman, and a product, which I

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Dave Myers
In a message dated 1/21/2002 10:26:52 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What you need to understand is that your success so far is based on widespread acceptance of your code and that your current market dominance is based on being the first mover in this space. Take

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Dennis G. Wicks
Greetings; This whole discussion reminds me of an email I got a few days ago. This particular company is working on a new and very interesting product and wanted me to be a beta tester for them. So far so good. The really hilarious part was that they wanted me to *pay* $99 for the privilege! I

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Dave Myers
In a message dated 1/22/2002 9:59:24 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I haven't heard anyone actually suggest a new business model for SuSE based on cheap prices, just whining about the new price. Most of us are not whining about the support costs...just the fact that

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Lionel Dyck
My take on this issue is that sites are still evaluating Linux and they don't have the official approval for funding. Thus they need access to Linux for evaluation purposes and that is the crux of the matter. Lionel B. Dyck,

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Wolfe, Gordon W
without giving us a free or inexpensive way to demo and sell our management on SuSE S/390 Linux. Without that...a lot of us can not convince our management to take a serious look at S/390 Linux. Seems to me, then, the solution is simple. 1. Download one

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Coffin Michael C
Not whining Gordon, but let's see - the kernel upgrades aren't written by SuSE - they're written by open source contributors and are offered free to all who want them, IBM provides the kernel patches to make the kernel run on S/390 architecture and the OCO driver updates. I expect that 85%

Re: AIX to Linux?

2002-01-22 Thread Kittendorf, Craig
I don't see how it could be considered off topic for this list. I really don't know anything about the application, or if an application even exists. I was asked by a supervisor, who was asked by a supervisor, etc, Can we run an AIX application on Linux-S/390? Thanks for those who

Re: Why not IBM's Linux

2002-01-22 Thread David Boyes
- Original Message - From: Steve Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey, I'm a sales guy, not a droid:-). I've installed Unix system around the world. I was the engineer, the programmer, the trainer and the cable guy. I can sell, too. Yep. That's why I said confused salesdroids. You're not

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Dave Myers
In a message dated 1/22/2002 10:47:37 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2. Spend two years getting it to work as a production system with no manuals and no help other than this list and a few presentations at SHARE (like I did), Huh? Based on what we did with SuSE 7.0,

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Post, Mark K
Mike Kershaw and I did just that with the Slackware distribution. I would not recommend it if you want to actually do any revenue-producing work on top of building (and maintaining) your own distribution. Putting a distribution together, even when you already have another architecture to use as

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Phil Payne
The Linux pricing issue works both ways, though. A recent post said that there were about 700 Linux/390 installations world-wide (300 production and 400 in test). If SuSE sells one copy at $100 to each installation, that's only $70,000 to cover research, creation of the kernel, packaging of

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread David Sainty
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:04:59PM -0500, Dave Myers wrote: In a message dated 1/22/2002 9:59:24 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I haven't heard anyone actually suggest a new business model for SuSE based on cheap prices, just whining about the new price. Most of

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Wolfe, Gordon W
Huh? Based on what we did with SuSE 7.0, I think we could demo a POC to management in 1 month or less. Guess it depends on what you want to demo Also depends on your expertise level (none when we started. Didn't even know simple shell commands.) and the demands of

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Wolfe, Gordon W
390 expertise is rare and expensive. PC weenies are dime a case (even if you don't return the empties... That's really good! Can I use it? Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -Piet Hein, Journal of Irreproducible Results March, 1971 Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D VM Technical

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-22 Thread Rick Troth
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Coffin Michael C wrote: EXACTLY! Forcing service contracts down the throats of shops that are evaluating ... SuSE does not seem to get! What is interesting to note is that this S/390 strategy appears to be the opposite of SuSE's INTeL Linux strategy, where they (like

RedHat 7.2 Code Changes Between RC2 and GA

2002-01-22 Thread Coffin Michael C
Hi David, Can you tell me what was changed (if anything) between RedHat 7.2 RC2 and the GA release? Is there a README or page somewhere that I can refer to? I'd like to upgrade my RC2 system to GA levels of code, but if little/nothing has changed it will save me a lot of time. -Thanks in

Slashdot Linux/390 benchmark article

2002-01-22 Thread David Alcock
Pardon my redundancy if this has been posted: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/20/202205 It's a Ask Slashdot from a guy wanting to compare Linux/390 to other platforms.

iuvc, debian, 2.4.16 ... Problem !

2002-01-22 Thread Laurent SIKSOUS
I'm using Debian unstable (sid) and the /etc/network/interfaces mechanism. How can i do the job of managing my iucv connections properly in 2.4.16, i mean without the trouble of getting these messages all the time when I load netiucv at one or at the other guest: kernel: iucv_add_pathid:

Re: Current Linux/390 Distributions Aren't Cheap

2002-01-22 Thread Coffin Michael C
Hi Stefan, BTW, the subject is also incorrect: Debian is free (as in beer and in speech) and will always be. Where can I find some of that free beer? :) Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer Internal Revenue Service - Room 6030 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C.  20224

Re: Why not IBM's Linux

2002-01-22 Thread Ferguson, Neale
People having trouble installing Oracle 9i Developers' on their systems are told that only SuSE SLES7 is what they'll get help with on their Linux Oracle forum. Thus, if you want to evaluate Oracle you can't do it by picking up the freely available 7.0. This may lead to a situation where you need