On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:44:58PM -0400, David Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 11:58, Jay Maynard wrote:
Don't feel that dated...SNOBOL/360 is now GPVed
I believe it was always public domain.
You're correct; it's SPITBOL/360 that I'm thinking of.
And of course, GPV is Jay's tiresome
Neale Ferguson wrote:
74283231 2c313029 unrecognised: 29 bad symbol index: 002c3130
This last line doesn't look good. Anyone seen anything like this before?
We have seen problems like this (caused by the linker getting confused
about the sizes of some sections and 'extending' the
Hi,
I'm trying to patch the vanilla 2.4.17 kernel with the
ACL patches from bestbits. I won't go through the gory details,
but twice I've patched, rebuilt, run zipl - but on reboot I get:
---
Parallelizing fsck version 1.19a (13-Jul-2000)
fsck.ext2: No such file
John, I truly do not think you need to worry so much about UUENCODE.
I suggest you remain skeptical, but not about UUE. It is only
one example, and is much less problematic than others.
I think I used CP500 on OS/2.
I think CP500 is an EBCDIC codepage, not an ASCII codepage.
(Loose use
Sorry - forgot a subject
I'm trying to patch the vanilla 2.4.17 kernel with the
ACL patches from bestbits. I won't go through the gory details,
but twice I've patched, rebuilt, run zipl - but on reboot I get:
---
Parallelizing fsck version 1.19a (13-Jul-2000)
The only time I've ever seen this error is when the dasd volume in question
is not listed in the parms file at boot time. Check /etc/zipl.conf.
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
skydive twice. -Motto of the Darwin Society
Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)
We're porting an app. that uses the JNI of the 1.3.1 JDK. It works under
other platforms but we are having problems with Linux/390. We get a SEGV
with the following (abbreviated) backtrace:
#0 0x44e6be5a in xeRunJniMethod ()
from /opt/IBMJava2-s390-131/jre/bin/classic/libjvm.so
#1
Oh boy. Have just built my first s390x kernel, 2.4.7 with gobs o'patches.
There were no other targets obvious in the top-level Makefile, so I did a
make boot.
Now I have this file vmlinux in /usr/src/linux. What do I do next? Did I
choose the wrong make target?
I'd also like to test this
Anyone know if EMU Mail or Squirrel Mail is available for Linux on S390?
Anyone using it?
I'm using Squirrelmail. Works fine as long as you have the latest patches for PHP
with Apache. There was a problem in recent versions that made it lock up.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rothman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyonw want to comment? Did I miss the part of the
code that preloads %ar4?
Well, ar4 is loaded together with the rest of the access
registers right at the end of head.S, immediately before
calling start_kernel:
lam0,15,.Laregs-.LPG2(%r13) # load access regs needed by
There were no other targets obvious in the top-level Makefile,
so I did a make boot.
I always do make image. If make bzImage produces
bzImage, and the s390 image is an uncompressed card deck,
then make image follows. The arch/s390x/boot/image
can be used for IPL.
Have just built my first
Hi,
Anyone using an IBM 9672 R22 running VM/ESA 2.4.0 RSU 0101 and Linux/390
Suse
distribution 2.2.16 as guest system?
I´m getting an error during initial installation steps:
After punched 03 files to linux machine´s rdr and ipled them I got the
following messages:
003 FILES CHANGED
Linux
SNOBOL...great for phone books...
Used it for a couple of years.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
James Melin wrote:
Oh my ghod do I feel dated. I mention SNOBOL here and people look at me
funny (they do that anyway, but even more). Last used SNOBOL on a CDC
machine, I forget what one, 22
We use IMP for web-based email on Linux/390.
You may want to look into that as a possible solution.
(very simular to Squirrel and EMU mail)
http://www.horde.org/imp/
-Joe
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Peter Rothman wrote:
Anyone know if EMU Mail or Squirrel Mail is available for Linux on S390?
LPI certification 102 exam prep, Part 2: Configuring and compiling the
kernel
In this dW-exclusive tutorial, Daniel Robbins prepares you for the Linux
Professional Institute's 102 exam. In this second installment of our LPI
102 series, you'll learn how to compile the Linux kernel from sources.
The only time I've ever seen this error is when the dasd volume in question
is not listed in the parms file at boot time. Check /etc/zipl.conf.
Have a look at the DEVFS options in your kernel config, and see if
you have enabled DEVFS plus mount on init without properly installing
the devfsd for
From: Sergey Korzhevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 31bit 2GB main memory
Sergey:
Do I think right, there is no sense to run 31bit application on 64bit
system? At least, for now?
I can't think of any reason to run 31-bit apps on the 64-bit kernel, and
the vendor products (such as
Jim,
Let's see... perhaps a CDC 6400 or CDC 6600? I remember them well, and
wrote many programs in CDC's assembler language, COMPASS!!! Couldn't help
but reminisce a bit when you mentioned a CDC machine. And that's about
the right timeframe, too!
I thought about them, decided Cyber
John, I truly do not think you need to worry so much about UUENCODE.
I suggest you remain skeptical, but not about UUE. It is only
one example, and is much less problematic than others.
I think I used CP500 on OS/2.
I think CP500 is an EBCDIC codepage, not an ASCII codepage.
(Loose
From: Sergey Korzhevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 31bit 2GB main memory
Sergey:
Do I think right, there is no sense to run 31bit application on 64bit
system? At least, for now?
I can't think of any reason to run 31-bit apps on the 64-bit kernel, and
the vendor products
From: Ulrich Weigand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 23:34:42 +0200 (MET DST)
[...]
Well, ar4 is loaded together with the rest of the access
registers right at the end of head.S, immediately before
calling start_kernel:
lam0,15,.Laregs-.LPG2(%r13) # load access regs
22 matches
Mail list logo
