The IBM zEnterprise System has been announced. Check out the
web site at http://ibm.com/systems/zenterprise
Jim
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the
Does he also need:
COMMAND SET VCONFIG MODE LINUX
due to the mixed environment?
Ray Mrohs
U.S. Department of Justice
202-307-6896
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:24 PM
To:
I have been asked several times by our network people if there is a way to
get Linux to stop using IPv6 DNS resolution. With multiple search domains,
Linux will try all of them in IPv6 before it tries IPv4. Especially when
considering the IBM WebSphere is excessive with its use of DNS lookup,
And what's old is new againthere's a water cooled version of the
z196. :-)
DJ
On 07/22/2010 06:38 AM, Jim Elliott wrote:
The IBM zEnterprise System has been announced. Check out the
web site at http://ibm.com/systems/zenterprise
Jim
Anybody recommend current install and use doc. We are running z/VM 5.4 and
Redhat 5.5.
I'm finding a lot of old doc for VM 5.1 and Redhat 4.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
Ed,
I think we need to look at your configuration a little deeper. You say that
Linux can see all 6 of your real processors. By default VM will give just
one virtual processor to a guest. How are you determining that you can get
to all 6 processors with Linux? I think you will need to start by
On Wednesday, 07/21/2010 at 05:20 EDT, Ed Long rdhm...@prodigy.net
wrote:
Thanks for thinking about our problem.
So does your construct
COMMAND DEFINE CPU 00 IFL
effectively tell VM to assign the first real IFL to this VM as CPU 00?
On our
system, the first real IFL is CPU 02 (00 and 01 are
Does that imply then that a TMC backed up sparse file could not be
restored to the same device it came off of? Would TMC attempt to
restore
all 26G?
Yes, and yes. Bitten by that one on Solaris too.
--
For LINUX-390
Thank you for the clarifications.
The VM LPAR in question is also running a z/OS guest hence the need to allocate
the real CP's. From the HMC profile perspective, all the engines are
shared among all the LPAR's.
Re John S.'s question, we used the VM performance toolkit to observe a
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 18:26, Sterling James wrote:
What's compression set to? I know that has other implications, also. Look
at the makesparsefile option for restore.
Tivoli Storage Manager backs up a sparse file as a regular file if client
compression is off. Set the compression option to
So the biggest announcement of the year, i'm on my second pot of coffee,
and there's still only one post about this? Is this a non-event?
Dave Jones wrote:
And what's old is new againthere's a water cooled version of the
z196. :-)
DJ
On 07/22/2010 06:38 AM, Jim Elliott wrote:
The IBM
Maybe everyone is waiting for the webcast.
The name is a little weird.
Sounds speedy - what do *you* think about it?
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not use,
Not the webcast, reading the Redbooks.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
pieter.har...@brabantwater.nl
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] Namens Marcy Cortes
Verzonden: donderdag 22 juli 2010 17:37
Aan:
Where or how is a disk address mapped to /dev/dasdx (where x is a, b,
c)? I ask because at install time I am -certain- that I instructed the
partitioner to make the 200 disk to be /dev/dasda1, the 201 to be
/dev/dasdb1, and 202 to be /dev/dasdc1. (I have a screen-shot of the
VNC windows, but
Ok, i listened to the announcement too. It does solve a lot of problems.
The issue with consolidating windows workloads - this would NOT be
done with emulators on z, the cost of an intel emulator is so high (as
anyone with a EECS degree should know). So the choice is convert to
Linux, but that
I was expecting more in the x86 area (Windoz, specifically servers) as
that is a much needed consolidation area.
Or did I miss something?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Barton Robinson
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:45 PM
To:
On Thursday, 07/22/2010 at 11:34 EDT, Barton Robinson
bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com wrote:
So the biggest announcement of the year, i'm on my second pot of coffee,
and there's still only one post about this? Is this a non-event?
Kind of hard to talk about the enhancements in support of
On Thursday, 07/22/2010 at 02:03 EDT, Gentry, Stephen
stephen.gen...@lafayettelife.com wrote:
I was expecting more in the x86 area (Windoz, specifically servers) as
that is a much needed consolidation area.
Or did I miss something?
From the FAQ:
Q: Will the zEnterprise System support for
On 07/22/2010 06:30 PM, Scully, William P wrote:
Where or how is a disk address mapped to /dev/dasdx (where x is a, b,
c)? I ask because at install time I am -certain- that I instructed the
partitioner to make the 200 disk to be /dev/dasda1, the 201 to be
/dev/dasdb1, and 202 to be
I was expecting more in the x86 area (Windoz, specifically
servers) as that is a much needed consolidation area. Or did I
miss something?
Stephen:
The management functions in zBX and URM depend heavily on
interfaces to the hypervisor and the operating system. With
PowerVM and KVM, and AIX and
Anybody recommend current install and use doc. We are running
z/VM 5.4 and Redhat 5.5. I'm finding a lot of old doc for VM
5.1 and Redhat 4.
Bobby:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247634.html
Jim
--
For LINUX-390
And what's old is new againthere's a water cooled version
of the z196. :-)
Dave:
zEnterprise is just following x86 and RISC here. Water is much
better at cooling that air and this does improve the
environmentals over time. There is a higher up front cost
however.
Jim
Jim,
Try this link. I am running zVM 540 and had no experience with Oracle, now I am
running 10gR2 in a testing mode on our z9.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/database10gR2.html
Ray Waters
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
Alan, are you trying to make this announcement so totally boring on
purpose? Just business as usual? nothing really new and exciting? Is
there anything here you could make exciting and explain why someone
would care? (faster is just expected, no longer exciting, more memory?
no support by z/vm
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:11:03PM -0400, Jim Elliott wrote:
And what's old is new againthere's a water cooled version
of the z196. :-)
Dave:
zEnterprise is just following x86 and RISC here. Water is much
better at cooling that air and this does improve the
environmentals over time.
So true, Barton.nothing to see here...move along :-)
I'd like more technical details on how workloads running on zLinux can
be integrated with supporting processes running on the blade Linux. can
a zLinux process control a blade server Linux process directly and if
so, how?
Nonetheless,
On 07/22/2010 02:11 PM, Jim Elliott wrote:
And what's old is new againthere's a water cooled version of
the z196. :-)
Dave:
zEnterprise is just following x86 and RISC here. Water is much
Which in turn followed the S/370.:-) LOL
better at cooling that air and this does improve the
If the hw+sw combo is cheaper than nehalem intel as the webcast suggested, that
is huge.
Too many people only look at HW/SW and think that that is TCO because the rest
is too difficult to calculate (or they are politically motivated not to count
the other stuff).
I would think the increased
Oh, by we I meant the linux-390 community.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any
information
On 7/22/2010 at 05:29 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
Oh, by we I meant the linux-390 community.
And here I thought you were going all Royal on us. :)
Mark Post
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff
LOL.
I was trying to say that to me it seems like the zBX will (at least initially)
be directed at adding some functionality (or maybe even offload because of that
pesky sw bill issue that ziips and zaaps try to fix) to z/OS only. The Smart
Analytics Optimizer is an example of that. One
On Thursday, 07/22/2010 at 04:58 EDT, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
wrote:
So true, Barton.nothing to see here...move along :-)
I'd like more technical details on how workloads running on zLinux can
be integrated with supporting processes running on the blade Linux. can
a zLinux
Alan wrote: - Politics. A way different definition of turf. When is
Distributed
not Distributed? When it's part of zEnterprise.
What's with the French accent Alan? I thought Altmark was German or Danish or
something?
But zee Enterprise sounds a lot better than zed Enterprise for sure.
Barton yanking Alans chain ...
Where have I seen that before ?.
Shane ...
On Fri, Jul 23rd, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Barton Robinson wrote:
Alan, are you trying to make this announcement so totally boring on
purpose? Just business as usual? nothing really new and exciting? Is
there anything here
On 7/22/2010 at 06:19 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
Sounds like it will be talking over that private IP network rather than some
sort of CP co-processor though, so anything is possible.
I didn't see any mention of an IP network, just that it was private. That
Argh, not SNA I hope!
What else could it be?
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any
it's a marketing thing.. we wouldn't understand ;-)
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Shane G ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Barton yanking Alans chain ...
Where have I seen that before ?.
Shane ...
On Fri, Jul 23rd, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Barton Robinson wrote:
Alan, are you
All the bits are now to be OSA connected.
Shane ...
On Fri, Jul 23rd, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mark Post wrote:
I didn't see any mention of an IP network, just that it was private.
That could mean a lot of things.
--
For LINUX-390
On 7/22/2010 at 08:48 AM, Rick Barlow rrhbar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been asked several times by our network people if there is a way to
get Linux to stop using IPv6 DNS resolution. With multiple search domains,
Linux will try all of them in IPv6 before it tries IPv4. Especially when
The IPv6 module was required for layer 3 NICs.
On 2010-07-22, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 7/22/2010 at 08:48 AM, Rick Barlow rrhbar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been asked several times by our network people if there is a way to
get Linux to stop using IPv6 DNS resolution. With
Thanks, Alan, that's what I wanted to knowwe still treat these
blades as distributed servers, only they're connected to the z via a
secure, fast, internal network. Excellent.
DJ
On 07/22/2010 05:29 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 07/22/2010 at 04:58 EDT, Dave
Nothing new about automated failover/DR? Something GDPS-like running on a
beefed-up HMC or on something smaller than another mainframe? Some of us
don't have z/OS and would be reluctant to put more eggs in the same
basket...
--
On 7/22/2010 at 08:29 PM, Richard Troth vmcow...@gmail.com wrote:
The IPv6 module was required for layer 3 NICs.
I just tried it in SLES10 SP3. Works just fine with either Layer 2 or 3
without IPV6. SLES11 requires it for Layer 3, but that just tells you what you
need to do when installing
Argh, not SNA I hope!
Well, we *were* consulted... 8-)
What else could it be?
They wouldn't let me do MOP or DECnet phase IV, so I went home. Boo hoo.
-- db
PS -- *grin*
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive
44 matches
Mail list logo
