http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33923.html
Can those working for IBM confirm that IBM believes this? I would
find it much more convicing if I heard that IBM is using it thus,
best if it's the preferred desktop.
Well I don't know what you want us to confirm. Sam's comments as
reported
Michael,
I have been runing 54 for few days and seems to work.
However this release broke OSA connection, it fails to init
osa card in boot
time and hangs, haven't found any solution yet.
Has SuSE updated you past -54? For the fun of it, I downloaded -60 from
X86-64 dist and OSAs seem to
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jim Elliott wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:40:41 EST
From: Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33923.html
Can those
Hi...
The following response:
qeth: Trying to use card with devnos 0x504/0x505/0x503
qeth: received an IDX TERMINATE on irq 0x8/0x9 with cause code 0x04
qeth: IDX_ACTIVATE on read channel irq 0x8: negative reply
qeth: There were problems in hard-setting up the card.
indicates (cause code
Curious if anyone has tried shifting from using bash to zsh.
If someone did switch or tried it and gave up, I would be curious to know
what you encountered.
Dave Froberg
Hi,
I want to implement VIPAs in my linux environment. First of all I defined
an alias on the network interface. Fine. This alias got my VIPA-adress. In
order to propagate this address to the network I used zebra/ospfd... I was
able to ping the address and I could use it. Till here, everything is
is it used in preference to Windows? AIX? etc.
Well, I for one certainly prefer Linux to Windows.
I mean - multiple virtual desktops alone make it far more usable. Seperate
screens for seperate tasks, and all that. The only thing I have to use
Windows for is when I get WordPro or Freelance
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 10:33, you wrote:
is it used in preference to Windows? AIX? etc.
Well, I for one certainly prefer Linux to Windows.
I'll second that. In my 2 years of desktop Linux (SuSE), mainly
administrative tasks and z/OS and z/VM monitoring, I'm happy. The only
thing I
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 08:18, Tim-Chr. Hanschen wrote:
My question now. How can I tell linux that all ip-traffic is bind to my
VIPA-address?
This might not be the best way, but you could use iptables, and in the
OUTPUT chain, rewrite anything with a source of your physical address to
have a
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:45, Joe Poole wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 10:33, you wrote:
is it used in preference to Windows? AIX? etc.
Well, I for one certainly prefer Linux to Windows.
I'll second that. In my 2 years of desktop Linux (SuSE), mainly
administrative tasks and z/OS
My biggest frustration about the Linux ready for the desktop is that
IBM's home/home office page still does not have Linux as an OS
option. (Dell and Getyway, the last time I checked don't either.) Until
IBM takes the plunge and PROVIDES Linux on the desktop it is hard to
convice users that it
I have to add that until I can run the latest Notes client either natively
on linux or under wine the desktop is not ready for prime time.
Notes is an IBM product and if they aren't going to enable the Notes
client for Linux then IBM is implicitly communicating that Linux is not
ready for the
About a year and a half ago, IBM (and I want to say Dell) sold laptops
and desktops with Linux installed. I still have the IBM catalogs
Then Dell pulled their Linux option. Seems Microslop said that
offering another operating system was in violation of the agreement for
Premier Business
IFF what you need is a Unix desktop, then Linux is ready.
When I started with BMC in late Spring of 1995,
the resources available to me were a bit limitted:
I had a 31xx series (IBM, coax) terminal. But while that was fine
for my VM tasks, it didn't facilitate my Unix responsibilities.
Next I
Hello (again) from Gregg C Levine
That's quite true. Dell, always did look at Linux strangely. During
the previous LWE, they were there, if only because Red Hat and,
(ugh!), Oracle was. What I find curious is that there is a company
called, Emperor Penguin, who will for a reasonable price, sell a
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 11:57, Richard Troth wrote:
This is not perfect. (Linux is not ready?) I am looking for a
better e-mail program. I *like* MS Outlook. Would be using Outlook
if I could get the native Win/2K partition (SCSI) attached to a VMware
guest. (SCSI issues with physical
Tried Ximian Evolution?
Yep.
1.2 comes with the KDE 3.1 (SuSE 8.2 or so) that I am running.
It gets a little funky if my evolution directory is on NFS. Bad.
I have tried pulling down sources to 1.4.x. No joy. It's just CVS,
but I haven't gotten the download automated. I know there are
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dennis Musselwhite wrote:
Hi...
The following response:
qeth: Trying to use card with devnos 0x504/0x505/0x503
qeth: received an IDX TERMINATE on irq 0x8/0x9 with cause code 0x04
qeth: IDX_ACTIVATE on read channel irq 0x8: negative reply
qeth: There were problems
from the Release Notes for SLES 8 S/390 zSeries Service Pack 3 (SP3):
1.1.7.1 LAuS was added to the Kernel
the Linux Audit System (LAuS) was added to the kernel. This is necessary
for the CC-EAL3-Certification.
SP3 seems to have lots of changes.
Sal
Hello all,
until the Open Source community come up with something that at
least looks like Lookout or Express Lookout, a lot of people will stay
with the devil they know. Human beings are... human beings, and until they
get such an equivalent from the Linux (Unix) world, they will stay
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 12:16, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich wrote:
Both NIC's came up ok when we run zvm 4.3, the directory entries for the
linux vm are exactly the same on both systems, and the linux configuration
doesnt change, thats indicate that the problem isnt linux configuration,
maybe the
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 12:16, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich wrote:
Both NIC's came up ok when we run zvm 4.3, the directory entries for the
linux vm are exactly the same on both systems, and the linux configuration
doesnt change, thats indicate that
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 12:41, John Cassidy wrote:
Hello all,
until the Open Source community come up with something that at
least looks like Lookout or Express Lookout, a lot of people will stay
with the devil they know. Human beings are... human beings, and until they
get such an
does anyone know if suse will provide sp3 as an iso? or will i have to
download each rpm?
+---
+
| Chris Little[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Ok Dept of Human Services Data Services Division
I've already sent them a note asking about this. IBM couldn't find ISO's either.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Little, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LINUX-390] sles8 sp3 iso's?
*** Reply to note of Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:06:25 -0500 (EST/CDT)
*** by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did it using yast2 online update.
sal
Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've already sent them a note asking about this. IBM couldn't find ISO's
either.
-Original Message-
From:
I am searching for ways to ensure maximum up time of my z/Linux
environment. As such, I am wondering, when adding dasd to the environment
is there a way to go from editing the zipl.conf file to dasdfmt without
rebooting. Currently, I add my device to zipl.conf and then execute zipl
followed by a
Little, Chris wrote:
does anyone know if suse will provide sp3 as an iso? or will i have to
download each rpm?
I'm currently using yast2 to download the lot. My online update
screen shows:
Retrieving patch-8623: Security update for CUPS Ok
Retrieving patch-8634: SLES 8 S/390 zSeries Service Pack
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 13:35, Eric Sammons wrote:
I am searching for ways to ensure maximum up time of my z/Linux
environment. As such, I am wondering, when adding dasd to the environment
is there a way to go from editing the zipl.conf file to dasdfmt without
rebooting. Currently, I add my
Hi,
Why a VM set the OSA portname just in uppercase??? I wrote portname,
in tcpip profile, in lowercase, and when I tried to config a Linux in
this OSA I needed to put the portname, in chandev.conf file, in uppercase.
How can I solve it? I need to put the VM portname in lowercase.
[]' s,
--
John Cassidy wrote:
Hello all,
until the Open Source community come up with something that at
least looks like Lookout or Express Lookout, a lot of people will stay
with the devil they know. Human beings are... human beings, and until they
get such an equivalent from the Linux (Unix)
Using the following, which was provided to me,
# echo add device range=0206 /proc/dasd/devices
I took the liberty of modifing the command to have so that I don't blow
away my devices file.
I then execute the following dasdfmt command:
dasdfmt -y -b 4096 -n 0206
dasdfmt: Unable to open device
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:10, Eric Sammons wrote:
Using the following, which was provided to me,
# echo add device range=0206 /proc/dasd/devices
I took the liberty of modifing the command to have so that I don't blow
away my devices file.
Actually, it won't. It's not really a file, it's
I then execute the following dasdfmt command:
dasdfmt -y -b 4096 -n 0206
dasdfmt: Unable to open device /dev/dasd/0206/device: No such file or
directory
0206(ECKD) at ( 94: 28) is dasdh : active at blocksize: 4096, 594000
blocks, 2320 MB
Anyidea what is happening here? I have
Why go through all the trouble? Just create the zipl.conf file with enough dasd
devices in it to cover future expansion. I use devices 290-2AF so I have 32 devices
created in zipl.conf. I may only use three or four of them, but who cares?
When I want to add another device to a server, just
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:38, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
Why go through all the trouble? Just create the zipl.conf file with enough dasd
devices in it to cover future expansion. I use devices 290-2AF so I have 32 devices
created in zipl.conf. I may only use three or four of them, but who cares?
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 21:10, Eric Sammons wrote:
dasdfmt -y -b 4096 -n 0206
dasdfmt: Unable to open device /dev/dasd/0206/device: No such file or
directory
The dasdfmt utility is assuming DEVFS active. You should use
dasdfmt -f /dev/dasdh -b 4096
Rob
does anyone know if suse will provide sp3 as an iso? or will i have to
download each rpm?
And any idea where the src.rpm's can be found?
~ Daniel
---
This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It
Try:
http://sdb.suse.de/download/s390/update/SuSE-SLES/8/sources/
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Daniel Jarboe
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] sles8 sp3 iso's?
does anyone
I have been running Notes under Wine (albeit Notes 5, 6 seems to have some
problems still) since well before 9/11, and this note was written in
exactly that way.
David
Lionel Dyck
Lionel.B.Dyck@To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, 11/12/2003 at 05:43 ZW2, Antônio Pires de Castro Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Why a VM set the OSA portname just in uppercase??? I wrote portname,
in tcpip profile, in lowercase, and when I tried to config a Linux in
this OSA I needed to put the portname, in chandev.conf
David - true - Notes R5 runs very well under Linux/Wine. It was
Notes 6 (the latest and greatest) that I was referring to. I
complained during the early support program for 6.0 and for 6.5 with
no success as it was not a priority for them.
I have been told that 6.5 works under the current
That is the kind of thing I was hoping someone would say (though I
didn't really expect it!).
Thanks.
Saying, Linux is ready for the desktop, is one thing, but Linux
is ready for the desktop _and we're using it_ are very different
statements.
Note that we do not believe Linux is ready for
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Richard Troth wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:57:52 -0600
From: Richard Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM
IFF what you need is a Unix desktop, then Linux is ready.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jim Elliott wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:31:23 EST
From: Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM
David - true - Notes R5 runs very well under Linux/Wine. It was
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jim Elliott wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:35:26 EST
From: Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM
That is the kind of thing I was hoping someone would say
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, John Summerfield wrote:
I've heard OOo has better compatibility, though I've no tried it yet.
I meant to say, OOo 1.1.
--
Cheers
John.
Join the Linux Support by Small Businesses list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
Copyright John
I've got Notes 6.5 and a SuSE 8.2 system with the latest version of wine
(as far as I know) and I was
unable to install Notes 6.5 under it (and I tried using both the last beta
and then the gold release candidate
and then the posted gold code all with the same lack of success).
perhaps my wine
When I want to add another device to a server, just log on to the server
console and issue
#CP LINK * 297 297 MR (for some reason, I can't use the hcp command to
do this...)
#CP DISC
The reason you can't use the 'hcp' command to process your LINK statement
as shown is the presence of the
I was at an IBM roadshow recently, where IBM talked about Linux
virtual srvers, new IBM storage technology and lots of other stuff.
Not a mention of Linux on the desktop, and as far as I could find
out, none of the IBM folk there new anything about it. I did ask,
and I asked some of the same
I've got Notes 6.5 and a SuSE 8.2 system with the latest version of
wine (as far as I know) and I was unable to install Notes 6.5 under
it (and I tried using both the last beta and then the gold release
candidate and then the posted gold code all with the same lack of
success).
Lionel:
The
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jim Elliott wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:03:50 EST
From: Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM
I was at an IBM roadshow recently, where IBM talked about Linux
52 matches
Mail list logo
