Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-20 Thread Phil Payne
Yes, BDAM can use the key portion, however faster access was achived if the lookup value for finding a record was mapped by some calculation into CCHHR; otherwise BDAM's performance was not much better than ISAM's There was an article in Datamation (back when it was a good magazine) called

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-20 Thread Ward, Garry
For VSE with FBA devices, the VTOC wasn't keyed as it was on a CKD device; it's been years since I used a 3310 or a 3370; so I'm stretching here; but the if I remember correctly, the vtoc was built on a VSAM KSDS model. Yes, BDAM can use the key portion, however faster access was achived if the

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-19 Thread Ward, Garry
The CKD's ability to handle separate keys from the data was born in the days of ISAM, when an indexed file was literally written with the index on the track. If the ISAM file was unblocked, then each record had the key for that record written first, then the data; an index search was data at the

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-19 Thread David Boyes
Has anyone tried iSCSI with S/390 ? Yes. The limiting factor is currently network adapter performance, but it does work for everything except IPL (duh). We're doing a bit more stress testing internally before letting it loose on the world. -- db

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-19 Thread David Boyes
Really? As in talking to existing Fiber Channel[1] disk arrays that speak FC-SCSI? and/or via FC-SCSI bridges to random SCSI devices? Where can I find out more? I used to work on FC-attached storage array systems at Compaq... Yup. They were demonstrating it at LinuxWorld in NYC in January.

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-19 Thread John Summerfield
The only folks that would really be in trouble are those who wrote code to mathmaticaly map some data value into a CCHHRR value, which is what Direct Access Method originally did. These people would have to come up with a way to convert their key value to a relative record number instead of

FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Rick Troth
I said (to John): S/390 does also have FBA (fixed block architecture) DASD devices. Sadly, even in the Linux world these are not widely known or used. I maintain that they should be employed heavily and heartily! The benefits are numerous. On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Jay Maynard wrote:

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Right. And since the actual backing store is fixed-block, I say let that which is presented also be fixed-block and ditch the track, record, count, and key info and the associated work. With CKD, Linux must play the C/H/S game. With emulated CKD, so must the DASD

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Adam Thornton
Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some S/390. Specifically, for P/390 (and presumably for Multiprise) a CD image, a .iso file, can be configured to the S/390 as an FBA. Yup. Works on a Multiprise too, as Dave Jones can attest. Adam

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Jay Maynard
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:44:13PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote: Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some S/390. Specifically, for P/390 (and presumably for Multiprise) a CD image, a .iso file, can be configured to the S/390 as an FBA. Yup. Works on a Multiprise too, as Dave

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Jay Maynard
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:44:39AM -0500, Rick Troth wrote: And what will happen now with SCSI attachment to zSeries? I can only hope that there will NOT be some CKD protocol. It just doesn't seem worth it when FBA is what is really happening. Probably so, at least for VM, VSE, and Linux.

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Ward, Garry
VSE used the FBA devices, 3310 3370s, in the 80s. As of VSE 2.4, 3310s are not listed as supported, and 3370s are listed as data volumes only, not for systems or installation use. There is a 9336 listed under FBA that appearently can still be used as a system or installation device, but I'm

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Florian La Roche
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:04:28PM -0500, Jay Maynard wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:44:13PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote: Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some S/390. Specifically, for P/390 (and presumably for Multiprise) a CD image, a .iso file, can be configured to

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Jay Maynard
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:27:35PM +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: if the author of hercules wants to have this, I'll reconsider this for the next rawhide upload. :-) That would be nice. Thanks! I must point out, though, that I'm not really the author of Hercules; I'm just the guy who gets to

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Ward, Garry
For VSAM it isn't that bad; and Relative Byte Address is a Relative Byte Address, on FBA it's a little easier becasue you just map from the first byte on the pack. VTOC's used the relative record approach instead of an CCHHRR. Garry E. Ward Senior Software Specialist Maritz Research Automotive

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Thornton Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?] Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Jay Maynard
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:17:45PM +0200, Phil Payne wrote: Mainframers - at least MVS types - aren't used to thinking that way. A sile as a stream of bytes is completely alien to them. System types, or application types? We've had RBA since VSAM I - lots of things like DB2 logs are

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Phil Payne
Mainframers - at least MVS types - aren't used to thinking that way. A sile as a stream of bytes is completely alien to them. System types, or application types? We've had RBA since VSAM I - lots of things like DB2 logs are RBA-governed. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 04/18/2002 at 10:44 EST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what will happen now with SCSI attachment to zSeries? I can only hope that there will NOT be some CKD protocol. It just doesn't seem worth it when FBA is what is really happening. As hard as it might be to believe,

Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]

2002-04-18 Thread Alan Cox
Really? As in talking to existing Fiber Channel[1] disk arrays that speak FC-SCSI? and/or via FC-SCSI bridges to random SCSI devices? Where can I find out more? I used to work on FC-attached storage array systems at Compaq... Has anyone tried iSCSI with S/390 ?